One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Put the false stories down
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 17, 2023 17:52:39   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
permafrost wrote:
I would like to see a much stronger response in both cases, but for NK Biden once more made the joint military games with SK a regular event, with China he did the fleet reposition nearer the artificial islands built in the South China sea and a show of force on behalf of Taiwan.. I believe sanctions were also placed on both but not sure how severe or how effective..


Yes... Those are all good examples...
More if a return to the post Trump era, with a few Trumpian sanctions thrown in...

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 19:08:13   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
permafrost wrote:
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concerned. No deals at all. None of the Bidens got 3 million from China

Now we know China invested in a Trump project when they ran out of money, millions and millions . Trump admitted owing the Chinese government owned bank of China over 500 million dollars.

We know H****r B***n served a 5 year term on the board of a Cypr**t company that did oil and gas exploration in the Ukraine and got paid slightly under the going rate for a corporate board member. The service that was provided was sitting on a corporate board and making decisions for the company. H****r B***n was also tapped because he had a record of being a successful venture capitalist, raising money for companies.

Biden has no ties to Russia or China and the only ties to the Ukraine is encouraging Americans to support the Ukrainians in defending themselves. Biden unlike Trump has stood up to both Russia and China as well as North Korea. He isn’t going to grovel to North Korea, or Russia or China as Trump did.
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concer... (show quote)

Pray for wisdom and discernment you have none

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 19:08:57   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
permafrost wrote:
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concerned. No deals at all. None of the Bidens got 3 million from China

Now we know China invested in a Trump project when they ran out of money, millions and millions . Trump admitted owing the Chinese government owned bank of China over 500 million dollars.

We know H****r B***n served a 5 year term on the board of a Cypr**t company that did oil and gas exploration in the Ukraine and got paid slightly under the going rate for a corporate board member. The service that was provided was sitting on a corporate board and making decisions for the company. H****r B***n was also tapped because he had a record of being a successful venture capitalist, raising money for companies.

Biden has no ties to Russia or China and the only ties to the Ukraine is encouraging Americans to support the Ukrainians in defending themselves. Biden unlike Trump has stood up to both Russia and China as well as North Korea. He isn’t going to grovel to North Korea, or Russia or China as Trump did.
There is no known deal where the Bidens are concer... (show quote)


Wake up to t***h!! See the difference

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2023 20:01:26   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
Justice101 wrote:
No sources listed- just l*****t fantasies and bull dung. Sounds like something the braindead Left get from their fave: Raw Story.


I never use RAW STORY...I have a brain that thinks and reasons.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 20:02:30   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Wake up to t***h!! See the difference


What t***h and Difference.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 20:04:03   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Yes... Those are all good examples...
More if a return to the post Trump era, with a few Trumpian sanctions thrown in...


Even more good ideas.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 20:32:39   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
LostAggie66 wrote:
I never use RAW STORY...I have a brain that thinks and reasons.

You are missing a take on reality. It is necessity to separate the factual reporting from the opinion.

Most, all actually, are from a left wing’s perspective. Half the country.

It is wise to know the enemy.

Some fact you would not know about if you do not at least read the RawStory burbs.

PS. Most will piss you off just as much as most of The Federalist blurbs rankle me.

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2023 20:46:14   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
You are missing a take on reality. It is necessity to separate the factual reporting from the opinion.

Most, all actually, are from a left wing’s perspective. Half the country.

It is wise to know the enemy.

Some fact you would not know about if you do not at least read the RawStory burbs.

PS. Most will piss you off just as much as most of The Federalist blurbs rankle me.


Correction: there is nothing factual to glean from the yellow stained pages of Raw Story, a lesson in how NOT to conduct journalism. It is a cacophony of opinions intermingled with nonsense disguised in their activist sensationalism. The rag is in existence to get clicks aka: clickbait journalism.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 21:34:11   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Justice101 wrote:
Correction: there is nothing factual to glean from the yellow stained pages of Raw Story, a lesson in how NOT to conduct journalism. It is a cacophony of opinions intermingled with nonsense disguised in their activist sensationalism. The rag is in existence to get clicks aka: clickbait journalism.

Ignore at your peril. It is wise to know your enemy.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 22:12:11   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Ignore at your peril. It is wise to know your enemy.


I've read their bullcrap Rascal. If you are an adherent of that activist nonsense junk, then you obviously need your head examined. I read and compare well known left-leaning news sites that have actual journalists working and writing for them as well as right-leaning and international sites. You really limit yourself when you read "tabloid sensationalism" that is almost entirely l*****t opinion based and meant to evoke some type of emotion from the reader. Similar to reading the gossip rags.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 22:19:05   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
I would like to see a much stronger response in both cases, but for NK Biden once more made the joint military games with SK a regular event, with China he did the fleet reposition nearer the artificial islands built in the South China sea and a show of force on behalf of Taiwan.. I believe sanctions were also placed on both but not sure how severe or how effective..


If Brandon wanted to show force he should’ve told China not to build islands in international water

Reply
 
 
Mar 17, 2023 22:59:31   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Birdmam wrote:
If Brandon wanted to show force he should’ve told China not to build islands in international water


Biden is more than a little late to that.. China started building in 2013 and never stopped.. Good point, China claims that area of the south China sea belongs to China but international law says otherwise.. where would we go to get a judgment on such an issue? never heard of challenge to international water anywhere else.

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 23:01:13   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
Biden is more than a little late to that.. China started building in 2013 and never stopped.. Good point, China claims that area of the south China sea belongs to China but international law says otherwise.. where would we go to get a judgment on such an issue? never heard of challenge to international water anywhere else.


UN

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 23:08:56   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Birdmam wrote:
UN


MMMM, yes, I think it would be good to see the issue brought up to the UN... but would like to understand jurisdiction on the issue.. at least on paper.. How about the world court.. In netherland????

Reply
Mar 17, 2023 23:25:12   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
permafrost wrote:
Biden is more than a little late to that.. China started building in 2013 and never stopped.. Good point, China claims that area of the south China sea belongs to China but international law says otherwise.. where would we go to get a judgment on such an issue? never heard of challenge to international water anywhere else.


The Philippines went to the international court if law... UN... But China doesn't recognize the ruling...

Personally, I think building those islands was brilliant...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.