Intelligence (Page 2): It would have to depend on the subject matter.

Bassman65

Larai wrote:

Thought of the day!~ Question: Even though We The People have a need/right to know.. Should our intelligence agencies or congress/senate have Live hearings on such matters?

My opinion is NO!..Oddly, I'm sure some would say, coming from me.

However, If WE The People know, so do our enemies, it would be naive to think otherwise!

But Curious as to your answers! :)

It would have to depend on the subject matter.

Larai Loc: Fallon, NV

I agree with all of your replies, I believe we should know some things, like JFK & C***d origins.. I guess what I was referring to is what our gov't says it's gonna do to our enemies!.. But you're right.. they already know.. because the "dems" are trying to destroy us from the inside out.. Hell Who needs external enemies when they are right here already doing their dastardly deeds right under out noses...Yes, our "intelligence agencies" Have gone rogue, under a rogue "president"

So, Knowing this would be a pipe dream.. I think that any money "aka Aid" to countries that h**e us, should be on the b****t for folks to chime in on, because obviously our "elected representatives" aren't really representing us but rather dictating what they WILL do with our tax dollars, Biden selling off our SPR to China, in MY view is treasonous!..

I know we've discussed the concept of whether or not all this crap they are doing TO us.. being A) Incompetence or B) Completely intentional.. My bet goes to B).. Regular Unleaded in my town is back up to $4.50 a gallon.. If Biden Really wanted to "win" in 2024, his best bet would be to tell the wokesters to STFU and turn the spigots back on and bar China from purchasing our farm land while at the same time they are trying to take control of our supply chain, which they are actively doing..

Puds Loc: So Centrl MN

WE have to be involved in the development of intelligence agencies that we can truly trust. Of course We will have to restore our Constitution as the rule of law. WE have allowed bipartisan treason.

True Patriot

Larai wrote:

Thought of the day!~ Question: Even though We The People have a need/right to know.. Should our intelligence agencies or congress/senate have Live hearings on such matters?

My opinion is NO!..Oddly, I'm sure some would say, coming from me.

However, If WE The People know, so do our enemies, it would be naive to think otherwise!

But Curious as to your answers! :)

Agreed

True Patriot

Gatsby wrote:

Our Intelligence Community has gone rogue, it is o... (show quote)

Amen. This is a police state.

True Patriot

okie don wrote:

Would be nice to know, after 60 years, who k**led JFK.

We know it wasn't Oswald.

Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia

True Patriot wrote:

We know it wasn't Oswald.

The democrats will blame Trump soon enough!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Larai wrote:

Thought of the day!~ Question: Even though We The People have a need/right to know.. Should our intelligence agencies or congress/senate have Live hearings on such matters?

My opinion is NO!..Oddly, I'm sure some would say, coming from me.

However, If WE The People know, so do our enemies, it would be naive to think otherwise!

But Curious as to your answers! :)

On what matters? There are certain things like defense of our country that should not be aired beforehand publicly.

Larai Loc: Fallon, NV

microphor wrote:

On what matters? There are certain things like defense of our country that should not be aired beforehand publicly.

That's what I meant to imply, that while we have a right to know about things like say C***d origins, JFK, what the gov't is doing with OUR money!

But right, yes our military maneuvers, what they plan to do with our enemies should be in closed door sessions.. But as stated in a LOT of the replies on this topic.. most likely our enemies already know what the US plans to do to them in the way of sanctions etc...

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Larai wrote:

That's what I meant to imply, that while we have a... (show quote)

I agree 100%. I don't want Gov deciding anything important especially as it relates to my liberties, and that includes taxation. I'm at the point that we need to treat the Gov like kids and give them spending limits of which they could not exceed without the populace v****g on it. In these kind of cases, it could be simple v**e, but a v**e.

Larai Loc: Fallon, NV

microphor wrote:

I agree 100%. I don't want Gov deciding anything important especially as it relates to my liberties, and that includes taxation. I'm at the point that we need to treat the Gov like kids and give them spending limits of which they could not exceed without the populace v****g on it. In these kind of cases, it could be simple v**e, but a v**e.