One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The One Question Pro A******nists Refuse To Anwer
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Feb 8, 2023 22:30:04   #
PeterS
 
AuntiE wrote:
Legally or morally?

Legally. Morals are relative...even for you conservatives.

Reply
Feb 8, 2023 22:36:49   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
PeterS wrote:
No, I don't think s***ery is okay but a******n isn't s***ery...it's a woman exercising her right to control her body. Let me ask you this if I need a kidney to survive and yours is a perfect match do I have a right to your kidney irrespective of how you might feel? And if you are going to say that you would be happy to give me a kidney then I would simply point out that is your choice--one that you made freely just as it would be equally your right to say no.

Now the question I am asking here is that since my right to life doesn't usurp your right to control your body why does the right of a fetus usurp all the rights of a woman to control her body?
No, I don't think s***ery is okay but a******n isn... (show quote)

A fetus can feel pain, and is a person. Not born yet, but still a person. If I thought like you, then I could just go down the street to the black drug dealer and stick a rod into his brains and say it’s just a late term a******n.

Reply
Feb 8, 2023 22:37:42   #
PeterS
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
You cannot have it both ways. If it is a life when someone is charged with murder it does not to cease to be a life in a******n. Very few a******ns are done for anything other than convenience.

Why does convenience matter? Does a woman have a right to control her own body...yes or no? I guess a better question to ask is why the rights of a fetus--even before it can viably live on its own--usurp all the rights of a woman?

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2023 22:42:36   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
PeterS wrote:
Why does convenience matter? Does a woman have a right to control her own body...yes or no? I guess a better question to ask is why the rights of a fetus--even before it can viably live on its own--usurp all the rights of a woman?


Because it is a person, that’s why. That woman gave up her right to choose the moment she gave up her right to say no.
If you don’t say NO
You can’t say DIE.

Reply
Feb 8, 2023 22:45:22   #
PeterS
 
Marty 2020 wrote:
A fetus can feel pain, and is a person. Not born yet, but still a person. If I thought like you, then I could just go down the street to the black drug dealer and stick a rod into his brains and say it’s just a late term a******n.

Children shot with an AR-15 feel pain too but it doesn't make you conservatives seek any changes to gun laws so I don't see how "pain" means anything simply because it's an a******n. And the rest of what you wrote isn't worth a response...

Reply
Feb 8, 2023 22:52:20   #
PeterS
 
Marty 2020 wrote:
Because it is a person, that’s why. That woman gave up her right to choose the moment she gave up her right to say no.
If you don’t say NO
You can’t say DIE.

What does saying yes or no have to do with anything? Are you saying you are in favor of an a******n if it's rape or incest? Be careful with our answer cuz a fetus that is the result of rape and incest feels pain too!

And a little side question here--what rights did the guy give up when he promised he would 'pull out' before he came? I promise sweetheart, I promise. Does he lose his right to control his body too?

Reply
Feb 8, 2023 22:54:50   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PeterS wrote:
Why does convenience matter? Does a woman have a right to control her own body...yes or no? I guess a better question to ask is why the rights of a fetus--even before it can viably live on its own--usurp all the rights of a woman?


You walked into it. You bring up viability. Does that mean you would support a restriction on a******n if the fetus has reached viability status (24-25 weeks)?

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2023 23:54:04   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PeterS wrote:
Why does convenience matter? Does a woman have a right to control her own body...yes or no? I guess a better question to ask is why the rights of a fetus--even before it can viably live on its own--usurp all the rights of a woman?


Still no response to my question.

Reply
Feb 9, 2023 00:46:56   #
PeterS
 
AuntiE wrote:
You walked into it. You bring up viability. Does that mean you would support a restriction on a******n if the fetus has reached viability status (24-25 weeks)?

I walked into what? In Texas that's what the old law read...and no, I have no problem with the old law.

Reply
Feb 9, 2023 00:59:34   #
EmilyD
 
PeterS wrote:
Children shot with an AR-15 feel pain too but it doesn't make you conservatives seek any changes to gun laws so I don't see how "pain" means anything simply because it's an a******n. And the rest of what you wrote isn't worth a response...

64 MILLION of them??

Reply
Feb 9, 2023 05:03:47   #
PeterS
 
EmilyD wrote:
64 MILLION of them??

Yeah, and how many before we started counting? My problem with this topic is that no one cared before RvW. It was all out of sight out of mind. Those who could afford it went to the hospital and had a "procedure" and those who couldn't take their chances with a back ally a******nist. And people such as yourself went on and didn't even give a s**t. But suddenly RvW comes around and oh boy, now you care. We all have the right to control our own bodies...even you women. Men have always taken the right to control their own bodies while women have been slowet to catch on. Eliminate a******ns and more women will use items such as Plan-B. Are you going to start counting how many Plan-B's are sold? Is that going to be how many a******ns we have now? In many ways, it's better this way. A******ns go back into the closet and people like you can pretend that they no longer exist. So be happy in your ignorance...may it serve you well.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2023 06:10:06   #
PeterS
 
EmilyD wrote:
It used to be. And now that we know that it is a human baby from at the moment of fertilization, the law should be changed back to it being a crime.

Who knows that? You're the one assigning "a human baby" to a clump of cells that you conservatives deem a human baby but don't give a s**t about once they are born. Then, the only thing you fine Christians care about is how to get them off YOUR tax rolls! But put them in a GD womb and you people shed crocodile tears from here to eternity. If you are going to force women to have children then you are going to have to provide services for those children once they are born. That means you are going to have to open your wallets and put your money where your mouth is something no conservative I've ever met is willing to do.

You guys are hypocrites when it comes to life. Don't you think a child shot with an AR-15 feels pain? That never stopped you conservatives from wanting to put them in the hands of every person in this country. Why does an 18-year-old mentally ill person need an AR-15? And still, no laws in a conservative lead state, or any state for that matter, to prevent one from buying one? And hell, suggest that we eliminate the problem altogether and you people want to start a war! Do you think that it makes a bit of difference to those children murdered with an AR-15 that they are "grieved over properly"? Where are you coming up with this crap...are you just throwing sh"t against the wall hoping that something might stick???



Reply
Feb 9, 2023 06:54:48   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Would you be in favor of abolishing laws that allow a person to be charged with murder for causing the death of the unborn through a criminal act?


It is a law in many states that allows just that. It used to be in California although that may have changed under the current i***t.

Reply
Feb 9, 2023 07:32:27   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PeterS wrote:
Is a******n a criminal act?


Not if it's retroactive and applied to you.

Reply
Feb 9, 2023 07:44:24   #
Liberty Tree
 
PeterS wrote:
Who knows that? You're the one assigning "a human baby" to a clump of cells that you conservatives deem a human baby but don't give a s**t about once they are born. Then, the only thing you fine Christians care about is how to get them off YOUR tax rolls! But put them in a GD womb and you people shed crocodile tears from here to eternity. If you are going to force women to have children then you are going to have to provide services for those children once they are born. That means you are going to have to open your wallets and put your money where your mouth is something no conservative I've ever met is willing to do.

You guys are hypocrites when it comes to life. Don't you think a child shot with an AR-15 feels pain? That never stopped you conservatives from wanting to put them in the hands of every person in this country. Why does an 18-year-old mentally ill person need an AR-15? And still, no laws in a conservative lead state, or any state for that matter, to prevent one from buying one? And hell, suggest that we eliminate the problem altogether and you people want to start a war! Do you think that it makes a bit of difference to those children murdered with an AR-15 that they are "grieved over properly"? Where are you coming up with this crap...are you just throwing sh"t against the wall hoping that something might stick???
Who knows that? You're the one assigning "a h... (show quote)


Poor attempt to deny and deflect from your hypocrisy. There many more crisis pregnancy centers who provide services after birth than there are a******n clinics, but you libs want to burn them down.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.