One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
(Why) are men better chess players than women?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 18, 2022 18:23:10   #
Gatsby
 
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilalic, Smallbone, McLeod & Gobet (PDF) has been a favourite study for many people, including the media, like "Der Spiegel". Their publication implied that men are rated higher in chess simply and only because more men are playing tournament chess than women do; their approach was consequently named the "participation rate approach". This paper was most prominently criticized by a 2014 publication by Howard — who concluded that the gap in performance was in fact not explicable by the number of players, but rather that there had to be a difference in brain performance. His approach is therefore called the "Natural talent hypothesis". Who is right?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/why-are-men-better-chess-players-than-women

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 18:58:35   #
son of witless
 
Gatsby wrote:
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilalic, Smallbone, McLeod & Gobet (PDF) has been a favourite study for many people, including the media, like "Der Spiegel". Their publication implied that men are rated higher in chess simply and only because more men are playing tournament chess than women do; their approach was consequently named the "participation rate approach". This paper was most prominently criticized by a 2014 publication by Howard — who concluded that the gap in performance was in fact not explicable by the number of players, but rather that there had to be a difference in brain performance. His approach is therefore called the "Natural talent hypothesis". Who is right?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/why-are-men-better-chess-players-than-women
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilal... (show quote)


This could be a litmus test for t***swomen. Let them play in Chess tournaments and if they do poorly they are really women ?

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 19:26:09   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Gatsby wrote:
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilalic, Smallbone, McLeod & Gobet (PDF) has been a favourite study for many people, including the media, like "Der Spiegel". Their publication implied that men are rated higher in chess simply and only because more men are playing tournament chess than women do; their approach was consequently named the "participation rate approach". This paper was most prominently criticized by a 2014 publication by Howard — who concluded that the gap in performance was in fact not explicable by the number of players, but rather that there had to be a difference in brain performance. His approach is therefore called the "Natural talent hypothesis". Who is right?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/why-are-men-better-chess-players-than-women
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilal... (show quote)


There are differences in brain performances between men and women... This has been recognized and studied for decades...

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2022 20:14:46   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Gatsby wrote:
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilalic, Smallbone, McLeod & Gobet (PDF) has been a favourite study for many people, including the media, like "Der Spiegel". Their publication implied that men are rated higher in chess simply and only because more men are playing tournament chess than women do; their approach was consequently named the "participation rate approach". This paper was most prominently criticized by a 2014 publication by Howard — who concluded that the gap in performance was in fact not explicable by the number of players, but rather that there had to be a difference in brain performance. His approach is therefore called the "Natural talent hypothesis". Who is right?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/why-are-men-better-chess-players-than-women
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilal... (show quote)


I'm actually great at checkers!.. I can beat ANY of you guys in a New York second!...😆😁

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 20:32:27   #
guzzimaestro
 
Gatsby wrote:
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilalic, Smallbone, McLeod & Gobet (PDF) has been a favourite study for many people, including the media, like "Der Spiegel". Their publication implied that men are rated higher in chess simply and only because more men are playing tournament chess than women do; their approach was consequently named the "participation rate approach". This paper was most prominently criticized by a 2014 publication by Howard — who concluded that the gap in performance was in fact not explicable by the


number of players, but rather that there had to be a difference in brain performance. His approach is therefore called the "Natural talent hypothesis". Who is right?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/why-are-men-better-chess-players-than-women
A famous and often-cited 2009 publication by Bilal... (show quote)


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Queen%27s_Gambit_(novel)

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 20:38:34   #
son of witless
 
proud republican wrote:
I'm actually great at checkers!.. I can beat ANY of you guys in a New York second!...😆😁


Checkers is a great game to teach a kid. One kid in my relation I can never beat. I have to let him win or he won't play me.

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 20:40:19   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
son of witless wrote:
Checkers is a great game to teach a kid. One kid in my relation I can never beat. I have to let him win or he won't play me.


Have you read Poe's essay on checkers???

It's quite good..

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2022 20:46:09   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
There are differences in brain performances between men and women... This has been recognized and studied for decades...


Exactly, and neither is better, just different (hormones and chemicals do that you know). But most people in the west have been spoonfed with woke l*****t Marxist indoctrination for the past five decades. The worst offenders have been the APA.

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 20:50:03   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
proud republican wrote:
I'm actually great at checkers!.. I can beat ANY of you guys in a New York second!...😆😁


Checkers is much more difficult than most people think.

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 20:59:56   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Checkers is much more difficult than most people think.


You should also check out Poe's essay...

Sorry... I can't find it...Stupid Chinese Bing...

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 21:09:48   #
son of witless
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Have you read Poe's essay on checkers???

It's quite good..


I have never heard of it. I cannot find anything in a search on it. Years ago I was into Poe. It's been years. I remember he did an essay on a mechanical chess player. Maelzel’s chess player, also known as the Turk was a sensation in it's day.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/debunking-mechanical-turk-helped-set-edgar-allan-poe-path-mystery-writing-180964059/

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2022 21:10:41   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
You should also check out Poe's essay...

Sorry... I can't find it...Stupid Chinese Bing...


Wasn't it from the The Murders in the Rue Morgue?

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 21:11:33   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Wasn't it from the The Murders in the Rue Morgue?


No🤬🤬🤬🤬

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 21:13:23   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
No🤬🤬🤬🤬


http://secretplans.org/post/347815652/edgar-allen-poe-on-chess-and-checkers

Here...
My head hurts now...
Stupid search engine...

Reply
Dec 18, 2022 21:19:42   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
No🤬🤬🤬🤬


Yes, I believe so.
But, since I don't care I'm not going to look for it. I have enough other distractions to waste time with.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.