Because someone is charged with a crime and not found guilty in court does not mean they did not do the crime...not at all.

Trump was let off of the hook on impeachment because republicans refused to hold him accountable, not because it was not proved he did the crimes as charged, but because they refused to hold him accountable.

When the DOJ decides not to prosecute a crime, it's not always because there was no crime, but because the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define, that in no way means that someone is innocent, it means they are getting away with crimes.

Up until just recently, when i**********nists were successfully charged with and found guilty of i**********n, there was constant lip service about how there was no i**********n because the DOJ had not charged it...because it's not charged didn't mean there was none.

You're ignorance of our Constitution and the law is shameful.

Trump was "let off the hook on impeachment" because the democrats failed miserably to provide sufficient evidence that he committed Treason, Bribery, or Other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Pelosi/Schiff/Nadler clown show had to rewrite Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution to lower the standards for impeachment. The articles those fools submitted to the senate were a freaking joke.

Since when has any court refused to prosecute a crime because "the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define"? And, regardless of the reasons for any court or prosecutor refusing to prosecute, why in the world would you assume that someone not charged with a crime and therefore not prosecuted is GUILTY? Or, as you put it,
"getting away with crimes"?

FYI, numbnuts, in the American system of justice, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.


Nearly 880 people involved in the J** 6 r**t were arrested, only 11 of them were charged with s*******s conspiracy.
Here is the official DOJ list of those arrested and charged The charges look pretty well defined to me.

Because someone is charged with a crime and not found guilty in court does not mean they did not do the crime...not at all.

Trump was let off of the hook on impeachment because republicans refused to hold him accountable, not because it was not proved he did the crimes as charged, but because they refused to hold him accountable.

When the DOJ decides not to prosecute a crime, it's not always because there was no crime, but because the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define, that in no way means that someone is innocent, it means they are getting away with crimes.

Up until just recently, when i**********nists were successfully charged with and found guilty of i**********n, there was constant lip service about how there was no i**********n because the DOJ had not charged it...because it's not charged didn't mean there was none.

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/29/1095538077/a-second-oath-keeper-pleaded-guilty-to-s*******s-conspiracy-in-the-j***6-r**t

A member of the far-right O**h K****rs extremist group has pleaded guilty to s*******s conspiracy and obstruction in connection with the J*** 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and agreed to cooperate with the government.

Brian Ulrich entered his guilty plea at a virtual hearing Friday in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The 44-year-old from Guyton, Ga., is the second O**h K****r to plead guilty to s******n charges in the highest-profile case to emerge from the federal investigation into the Capitol r**t.

Ulrich is one of 11 O**h K****rs, including the group's founder Stewart Rhodes, to be charged with s*******s conspiracy and other crimes for allegedly plotting to use force to prevent Congress' J*** 6 certification of President Biden's e******n win.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/oath-keepers-verdict-s*******s-conspiracy-trial-rcna58415


Two O**h K****rs, including founder, convicted of s*******s conspiracy in J*** 6 case
Jurors found all five O**h K****rs on trial guilty of obstruction of an official proceeding in the most serious J*** 6 case brought by the Justice Department so far.

Nov. 29, 2022, 3:47 PM CST / Updated Nov. 29, 2022, 8:52 PM CST
By Ryan J. Reilly and Daniel Barnes

WASHINGTON — A federal jury in Washington on Tuesday found O**h K****rs founder Stewart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs, another member of the far-right organization, guilty of s*******s conspiracy in connection with the J*** 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, a victory for the government in a case that involved a rarely used Civil War era statute.

Because someone is charged with a crime and not found guilty in court does not mean they did not do the crime...not at all.

Trump was let off of the hook on impeachment because republicans refused to hold him accountable, not because it was not proved he did the crimes as charged, but because they refused to hold him accountable.

When the DOJ decides not to prosecute a crime, it's not always because there was no crime, but because the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define, that in no way means that someone is innocent, it means they are getting away with crimes.

Up until just recently, when i**********nists were successfully charged with and found guilty of i**********n, there was constant lip service about how there was no i**********n because the DOJ had not charged it...because it's not charged didn't mean there was none.