woodguru

Because someone is charged with a crime and not found guilty in court does not mean they did not do the crime...not at all.

Trump was let off of the hook on impeachment because republicans refused to hold him accountable, not because it was not proved he did the crimes as charged, but because they refused to hold him accountable.

When the DOJ decides not to prosecute a crime, it's not always because there was no crime, but because the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define, that in no way means that someone is innocent, it means they are getting away with crimes.

Up until just recently, when i**********nists were successfully charged with and found guilty of i**********n, there was constant lip service about how there was no i**********n because the DOJ had not charged it...because it's not charged didn't mean there was none.

American Vet

And the DoJ didn’t press charges for ‘i**********n’ because there was no i**********n. They did press charges for many horrible crimes such as ‘trespassing’..

Gatsby

Evidence is all you lack, without that all you have is BS,, with which you are over seriously overloaded,

Samael

You should pay attention to what’s going on now with the country you seem to have your head up trumps ass he’s long gone from power you can relax now

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Now apply that same standard to Hillary, H****r, Joe and numerous other Democrats.

Slapyomomma Loc: Lone Star State

Seek therapy, also quit using your noggin for ax handle testing.

Liberty Tree

Words from one who believes in guilt by accusation and not proof. Words from one who does not believe in the Americs system of innocent until proven guilty. Words from one who h**es the Constitution. In other words you are the real h**e America, t*****rous i**********nist.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Does this apply to you, personally as well?

manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA

Do we have to dwell on every person that has been acquitted, every person whose case has been dropped, every person arrested but not charged, because they may have been guilty anyway? Or do we have to consider your snide attempt to convict these people in the public sphere when they have not been found guilty at all? You are assuming their guilt. I***t!

Smedley_buzkill

I'll just bet you can tell us the names of the people convicted of "i**********n." Tell us, how many people have been convicted of "i**********n?" I have pretty good research sk**ls and I cannot find the name of a single one, and this is public knowledge if it exists. You say that people were "successfully charged with and found guilty of i**********n." Let's have some names, Perry Mason. The names of those convicted, the dates of their conviction and the charges and sentences are all a matter of public record. You seem to lack understanding of "i**********n." You also seem to have a comprehension problem with the concept known as "t***h." Prove it or admit you are a liar.

son of witless

" Because someone is charged with a crime and not found guilty in court does not mean they did not do the crime...not at all. "

Do you mean like when Democrats all v**ed to not throw Bill Clinton out of office when he was impeached ? Do you mean when Comey first laid out Hillary's crimes, then said no prosecutor would prosecute her ?

Smedley_buzkill

I looked up his claim about several people being convicted of "i**********n." You know I'm a good researcher. I cannot find one single person, and this stuff is public knowledge. I told Woodglue to provide names and dates, which are, as I said, public knowledge or admit he is a liar.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

You're ignorance of our Constitution and the law is shameful.

Trump was "let off the hook on impeachment" because the democrats failed miserably to provide sufficient evidence that he committed Treason, Bribery, or Other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Pelosi/Schiff/Nadler clown show had to rewrite Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution to lower the standards for impeachment. The articles those fools submitted to the senate were a freaking joke.

Since when has any court refused to prosecute a crime because "the standard of proving it is too cumbersome or hard to define"? And, regardless of the reasons for any court or prosecutor refusing to prosecute, why in the world would you assume that someone not charged with a crime and therefore not prosecuted is GUILTY? Or, as you put it,
"getting away with crimes"?

FYI, numbnuts, in the American system of justice, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.


Nearly 880 people involved in the J** 6 r**t were arrested, only 11 of them were charged with s*******s conspiracy.
Here is the official DOJ list of those arrested and charged The charges look pretty well defined to me.

Smedley_buzkill

I have one right now needs testing. I'll be happy to donate it for testing, but I would like it back. Hickory makes good kindling if it fails the test.

Smedley_buzkill

There is also a legal difference between s******n and i**********n, and I will leave it to Woodglue, with his impressive research abilities to look it up. I'm tired of doing his work.