One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Richmond restaurant denies pro- life, pro- family group dinner service over Christian values..
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 6, 2022 19:30:58   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
I love the line about intolerance of the left...

These christian fundamentalist groups define intolerance


Not at all. Have you ever heard of cancel culture? Wokism? Protesting and attacking Christian or conservative speakers? THAT is intolerance. THAT is what the left is all about.
There are very few people who claim to be religious who are intolerant of anyone, and those few are in strong doubt about being authentic Christians.
Your view of intolerance is anyone who will not celebrate sin along with you.
That is not intolerance. That is having standards, ethics, morals, and integrity.
I know......it is like I am speaking a foreign language, isn't it? Comprehension will come to you though, either before your death or immediately thereafter.

Reply
Dec 6, 2022 19:40:04   #
kemmer
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Your view of intolerance is anyone who will not celebrate sin along with you.
That is not intolerance. That is having standards, ethics, morals, and integrity.

And only evangelicals have those qualities, right?

Reply
Dec 6, 2022 19:56:32   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
kemmer wrote:
And only evangelicals have those qualities, right?


Not at all. I know many good people who are not evangelicals, and some who are not Christians. I even know a couple of firm athiests who are decent and ethical.
Why, I even know a few Democrats who are very good people, ethical and kind. They just know nothing about politics and are not interested in learning. They are APPALLED by the things the Democrat party says and claims, recognize them as lies, but v**e Democrat anyway because they were raised to believe that Republicans are for big business and Democrats are for the working man, in spite of all the obvious evidence to the contrary. They prefer to believe that such things as t***sexuals in women's sports, open borders, and inflation are all lies by the GOP. Easier to go with that false flow. For the most part, they decline to discuss politics. They are lazy that way.

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2022 20:21:44   #
Lily
 
kemmer wrote:
Turnabout's fair play. The net recently is all about the SCOTUS' upcoming ruling on the right of private businesses to use religious beliefs to refuse service to gays. It goes both ways, sweetheart,


You are a true fu*ckwad. Always using sexist endearments as an insult.

Reply
Dec 6, 2022 22:15:54   #
Digger47
 
RandyBrian wrote:
The restaurant had every right to deny them service. Just a I have every right to support the group financially and any other way I can, and to do my best to dissuade any future clients from going to the Metzger’s Bar and Butchery in Richmond, Virginia. EVER!
So please remember the name: Metzger’s Bar and Butchery in Richmond, Virginia.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I remember right, any business has the right to deny service to anyone period, full stop. Don't you remember signs on stores an restaurants that said "no shoes,no shirt, no service". Freedom of choice is another freedom liberals are taking away because it disagrees with their agenda.

Reply
Dec 6, 2022 22:41:00   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Digger47 wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I remember right, any business has the right to deny service to anyone period, full stop. Don't you remember signs on stores an restaurants that said "no shoes,no shirt, no service". Freedom of choice is another freedom liberals are taking away because it disagrees with their agenda.


They do......as long as no one accuses them of doing it for r****t reasons, or because of g****r, or because of supposed homophobia, or because of anything else the left wants to accuse them of. Proof is not required. In today's world, the accusation is sufficient for condemnation and conviction...at least in the media.

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 00:45:05   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
This restaurant violated law Its against the law to discriminate against religious beliefs.. Garland should do something about this BS!!... This restaurant should be closed down and people should boycott!!...

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2022 01:06:32   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
proud republican wrote:
This restaurant violated law Its against the law to discriminate against religious beliefs.. Garland should do something about this BS!!... This restaurant should be closed down and people should boycott!!...


It is in California, but I do not know about Richmond. Seems to me that the restaurant can be sued, or at least be fined or forced to discipline their employees who are apparently too bloody 'woke' to be in the service business.

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 01:12:46   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
RandyBrian wrote:
It is in California, but I do not know about Richmond. Seems to me that the restaurant can be sued, or at least be fined or forced to discipline their employees who are apparently too bloody 'woke' to be in the service business.


Agree!!... So why nobody's doing anything about it?

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 02:47:09   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
When did enjoying a meal at a restaurant become such an ordeal? It funny seems only liberals appear to attack people when they swear they're the group of love and diversity and inclusion. As for women's rights they need to petition their state that's it and to go to the health department and get some preventative there is plenty to choose from

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 04:10:08   #
Mario Moreno
 
[quote=RandyBrian]Not at all. Have you ever heard of cancel culture? Wokism? Protesting and attacking Christian or conservative speakers? THAT is intolerance. THAT is what the left is all about.
There are very few people who claim to be religious who are intolerant of anyone, and those few are in strong doubt about being authentic Christians.
Your view of intolerance is anyone who will not celebrate sin along with you.

At this moment, the SCOTUS is preparing to hear a case concerning two homosexuals who are trying to force a web page designer to create a website for their upcoming wedding.
The business owner has declined due to religious beliefs but the homosexuals are going to the SCOTUS to force the business to do their bidding! There is no thought of going to another similar business with their request. They want to make this particular business owner do their bidding!
I seem to remember this situation happening before with a wedding cake for a homosexual wedding.
The bakery was successfully sued and fined and had to shut down because of the expense and negative publicity coming from the intolerant alphabet people. The bakery eventually countersued and prevailed.
My question is, didn’t this establish a legal precedent concerning these types of frivolous, toxic lawsuits??? Could it be that the difference is the subject matter of the cases??? Wedding cake versus webpage?
It all seems very wasteful and unnecessary to me!!!
If they don’t want to do your request, just go somewhere else that will!!!
Going woke isn’t the way to get things done!
What if the business goes woke back on you, again???

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2022 04:49:51   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
[quote=Mario Moreno]
RandyBrian wrote:
Not at all. Have you ever heard of cancel culture? Wokism? Protesting and attacking Christian or conservative speakers? THAT is intolerance. THAT is what the left is all about.
There are very few people who claim to be religious who are intolerant of anyone, and those few are in strong doubt about being authentic Christians.
Your view of intolerance is anyone who will not celebrate sin along with you.

At this moment, the SCOTUS is preparing to hear a case concerning two homosexuals who are trying to force a web page designer to create a website for their upcoming wedding.
The business owner has declined due to religious beliefs but the homosexuals are going to the SCOTUS to force the business to do their bidding! There is no thought of going to another similar business with their request. They want to make this particular business owner do their bidding!
I seem to remember this situation happening before with a wedding cake for a homosexual wedding.
The bakery was successfully sued and fined and had to shut down because of the expense and negative publicity coming from the intolerant alphabet people. The bakery eventually countersued and prevailed.
My question is, didn’t this establish a legal precedent concerning these types of frivolous, toxic lawsuits??? Could it be that the difference is the subject matter of the cases??? Wedding cake versus webpage?
It all seems very wasteful and unnecessary to me!!!
If they don’t want to do your request, just go somewhere else that will!!!
Going woke isn’t the way to get things done!
What if the business goes woke back on you, again???
Not at all. Have you ever heard of cancel culture... (show quote)


Agreed.

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 09:06:13   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
RandyBrian wrote:
The essence of Christianity is sharing with those who are willing to listen.
The only ones "offended" by it are people of certain specific alternate religions, and left wing loons who get outraged if they see, hear, read, or assume anything that they disagree with.



Woodguru is offended by anything conservative or Christian. Its hard to understand how anyone with any intelligence could back this excuse for a president.

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 09:27:09   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
Woodguru is offended by anything conservative or Christian. Its hard to understand how anyone with any intelligence could back this excuse for a president.


If I was less of a nice guy, I would be tempted to say "I haven't seen anyone with ANY intelligence back Biden."
However, such an intolerant and snarky thought never entered my mind, so of course I never said it.

Reply
Dec 7, 2022 10:28:40   #
Weswill
 
kemmer wrote:
Turnabout's fair play. The net recently is all about the SCOTUS' upcoming ruling on the right of private businesses to use religious beliefs to refuse service to gays. It goes both ways, sweetheart,


I assume you are talking about the gay cake situation. If you are you have got it wrong. The owner did not refuse service to make a cake. He refused to decorate the cake advertising gay marriage. Not exactly what you stated.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.