Breaking: The Identity Of The Shooter That K**led At Least 7 People At A Walmart In Virginia Is Revealed – He Doesn’t Fit The Mainstream Med (Page 18): Criminals obtain guns illegally.

American Vet

PeterS wrote:

Ah, so you give them guns and we release them to use them...Gotcha!

Criminals obtain guns illegally.

If you were to research it a bit, you would find that criminals (by definition) do not obey the law. So gun control laws disarm the good citizen - not the criminal.

PeterS

Conservative Girl wrote:

Well, there goes the f**e news narrative… This video will be buried by the mainstream media in one day! Gun control is turning all law-abiding citizens into helpless defenseless victims. The criminals still have guns but now they have easier targets. https://defiantamerica.com/breaking-the-identity-of-the-shooter-that-k**led-10-people-at-a-walmart-in-virginia-is-revealed-he-doesnt-fit-the-mainstream-media-narrative-video

So you are jumping for joy because it's not a right-wing moron who is shooting up the country with an AR-15. He still used a semi-automatic so the narrative is the reality the same.

We've gotten rid of automatic weapons so now it's been proven that semi-automatics need to follow the same path, how has the narrative changed?

PeterS

American Vet wrote:

Criminals obtain guns illegally.

If you were to research it a bit, you would find that criminals (by definition) do not obey the law. So gun control laws disarm the good citizen - not the criminal.

So? The fewer the guns the harder it will be for criminals to obtain weapons. Why do you think it's so hard to figure out?

moldyoldy

PeterS wrote:

So? The fewer the guns the harder it will be for criminals to obtain weapons. Why do you think it's so hard to figure out?

Most mass shooters get their guns legally.

American Vet

PeterS wrote:

So? The fewer the guns the harder it will be for criminals to obtain weapons. Why do you think it's so hard to figure out?

Why is it so hard for you to figure out the guns will still be there for criminals. After all, look how well the ‘War on Drugs’ has been.

And keep in mind the 50,000+ defensive gun uses that occur annually. Why are you so opposed to the good citizen being able to protect himself, His family and his property?

BIRDMAN

American Vet wrote:

Why is it so hard for you to figure out the guns will still be there for criminals. After all, look how well the ‘War on Drugs’ has been.

And keep in mind the 50,000+ defensive gun uses that occur annually. Why are you so opposed to the good citizen being able to protect himself, His family and his property?

I think it’s more like 3 million that protect themselves with guns I would have to look it up again

American Vet

Birdmam wrote:

I think it’s more like 3 million that protect themselves with guns I would have to look it up again

IIRC, the CDC report put the number between 50,000 and 2 million.

Interesting note: obama commissioned the CDC to do they study. Obviously it was not at all what they wanted so the report was ‘buried’ - and of course the MSM never reported it.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

PeterS wrote:

We've gotten rid of automatic weapons so now it's been proven that semi-automatics need to follow the same path, how has the narrative changed?

We have neither gotten rid of automatic weapons nor has it been proven that semi-auto weapons should be gotten rid of. That is Hoplophobic bulls**t.

Semi-auto firearms have been used many more times to prevent an attack, stop a crime in progress, and save lives
than they have been used to commit crimes. Those are the stats, peter, from studies conducted by university criminologists and crime prevention institutions. The CDC reviewed these studies and confirmed the stats.

Depending on methods used in these studies, the consensus is that GDU incidents occur between 500,000 and 2 million times per year.

So, let's be clear about the specific firearm you have in mind.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

PeterS wrote:

Ah, so you give them guns and we release them to use them...Gotcha!

No, you re-release them! Knowing they're f**king animals, you put them back on the streets. If not for guns, they use hands, walk up behind d women and push them onto tracks, walk up behind man and hit him with bat, wait till teens get home and stab them with knives. You put the people who use weapons to harm other people back on the streets and say "it's the weapons fault! See how stupid that is?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

PeterS wrote:

So? The fewer the guns the harder it will be for criminals to obtain weapons. Why do you think it's so hard to figure out?

If 4 men rush into your house, but only one has a gun, are you in any less danger then if all four were armed, maybe! maybe not! What I know for a fact, as long as I'm armed, if four men rush my house, armed or not, I at least have a fighting chance if I am armed. You CAN'T have my gun!!!! Oh yeah, don't forget, Joe just released the deadliest "arms dealer" known to man back into society. You a criminal and need a guy, no problem, he's got your back!!!!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

American Vet wrote:

Why is it so hard for you to figure out the guns will still be there for criminals. After all, look how well the ‘War on Drugs’ has been.

And keep in mind the 50,000+ defensive gun uses that occur annually. Why are you so opposed to the good citizen being able to protect himself, His family and his property?

I'm starting to wonder if he has something personal to gain by disarming citizens. Maybe making them an easier target for criminals, puts him in a good spot to take advantage.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

American Vet wrote:

IIRC, the CDC report put the number between 50,000 and 2 million.

Interesting note: obama commissioned the CDC to do they study. Obviously it was not at all what they wanted so the report was ‘buried’ - and of course the MSM never reported it.

Yelp, the Democrat Way. Tell them what you want them to believe, not the t***h!

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

PeterS wrote:

And what's the mainstream narrative? If you look at mass shooters there isn't "one" type but a multiple of types with the only common thread how easy it is to get a semi-automatic weapon...that's the mainstream narrative and one conservatives dare not do anything about!

Fool....... 1000 yrs if mass k*****gs before gunpowder was even invented.

Ban the gun and you will die by the sword, ban the sword and you will die by blunt force trauma from a 2x4 or oak branch.

Your premise is foolish and the common thread is k*****g people, not how easy it is to get the tool used to do it.

Remember when yall were bombing little black kids in church basements? Guns were far more readily available with zero background checks..... registration wasn't required..... yet you tossed a bomb instead, much harder do that than squeeze a trigger.... yeah?

You liberals whine just to hear yourselves whine, moving from one stupid fallacy to another and never solving s**t because you're blind to the self imposed ignorance and refusal to see reality is the byproduct of that.