dwp66

No, he didn't say "all of them" In fact he said this, and I quote:

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

And you link, of all people, an opinion piece by KAYLEIGH MCENANY? Seriously? Yes, good ol' Kayleigh, the most dispassionate and un-biased Trump employee on the planet, to back up your argument? Most all she does here is whataboutism of Hillary, read it again and tell me I am mistaken here. And IMO, whether he had Lafayette Square cleared or not, it was still a shameless photo op for his purely f**e Christianity. Fact is, no one can lie about Trump more than Trump himself can lie about, well, anything at all.

dwp66

Btw, still waiting on your evidence are "still being r****d in favor of the democrats". What's the problem? Can't find supporting evidence because there isn't any?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Short of repeating over and over, the main c***ting involved b****t harvesting and states changing their e******n laws illegally.

But I'm tired of having to present to Newbys what have been thoroughly discussed on this forum already. States changing e******n laws illegally is indisputed.

nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert

And who burned the historic church behind President Trump? Dem damned Dems dammit

dwp66

𝑰𝒏 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒔, 𝒘𝒆'𝒗𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒚 𝒔𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒆 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆.

So explain to us "newbies" how "b****t harvesting", and "changing e******n laws" to make it easier to v**e during a p******c, cost Republicans the e******n and is "c***ting". And, because some guy makes the trip to the library and put's five family member's b****ts into a drop box doesn't mean those are "illegal v**es". At all.

Republicans have zero interest in making v****g easy for even 90 year old grandmas to cast a b****t, in fact they want v****g to be difficult. If every Democrat went out and v**ed every time, you guys would never win another e******n. Simply put, if you guys don't figure out why you >really< lost, you are destined to lose again.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Accepting illegal v**es cast after deadlines is not, ina and of itself specifically inhibitory to republicans, but it went hand in hand with b****t harvesting, the casting of a mail in b****t by someone other than the v**er of close family member. These guys went into nursing homes and poor neighborhoods, getting signatures for money or by sheer fraudulent appeal, then filled them out and mailed them in "in bulk." It was filmed and tracked in thousands of instances. When the judges refused to hear the evidence, they made a movie about it; 2000 mules, a mere tip of the iceberg of what is being done by FB paid "harvesters." Mules.

And it wasn't massive fraud, it was just enough to turn the tide to the democrats in just enough places to take a battle ground state where the winning margin is very small. Just enough to avoid being covertly noticed.

dwp66

Basically everything you stated above is the basis for Dinesh Dsouza's ludicrous movie. I watched it with a rightie friend and argued with him for days about it. 2000 Mules is probably the most debunked documentary I've ever seen, mainly because it makes a ton of assumptions that can't possibly be proven. How do we know these "harvesters" were paid? Because a "whistleblower" said so. He never shown or heard in the movie & no one knows who he is, but you just gotta' take True the V**e's word on this! And although this was supposedly done on a huge scale in multiple states - but not a single person has come forward publicly to say the Dems paid them for any b****ts. Not one. And it WAS NOT "filmed and tracked in thousands of instances" - that is pure BS backed up by nothing at all. The movie shows the bike guy & a few others but doesn't show a single instance of the same person at another drop box. Throw in crap like "GPS can geolocate you to within 18 inches" when the reality is more like 30 feet. Figuring the average "drop" was, like, 5 b****ts when actually they haven't a clue. Saying there were "2000" people doing this using purely speculative math (that number was simply pulled from somebody's butt).

Even D’Souza admits his movie does not show evidence to prove his claims about b****ts being collected and submitted. Read his one & only interview he ever gave on the movie, don't take my word for it.

Finally, ask yourself why all those other Republicans on the ticket in 2020 won. If Dems are so crafty they can pull off conspiracies like this, why didn't they, get rid of Mitch McConnell, MJT, Ron Johnson, or any of the others they'd like to see v**ed out? Hmm? Trump lost the popular v**e by 7 Million v**es, simply because millions of us despise the man. Simple as can be.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/17/discussing-gaps-2000-mules-with-dinesh-dsouza/

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

What they were doing was illegal so no, they won't come forward. As for a whistleblower, yall impeached a president based on one.

Maybe you can explain how nursing homes had 100 % of their residents v**e Democrat, even the ones in dementia lock down.

It doesn't matter, you'd never believe anything about it. You think inflation is good and we have a strong economy, no recession at all!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

dwp66

Nothing wrong with being a whistleblower. But Col. Alexander Vindman, the whistleblower you mentioned, also came forward and gave testimony under oath to what he heard. We all know who he is. True the V**e refused to release his/her name, even to the Georgia FBI, and D’Souza never even spoke with him/her either. If you have that many people involved in a conspiracy, somebody somewhere is going to spill the beans whether they were paid or not, and I have no doubt such a whistleblower could get immunity to testify on such a serious issue. Wouldn't you agree? 2000 Mules is, IMO, bulls**t.

As far as nursing homes, please share a link regarding your assertion that “100%” of nursing home residents v**ed for Democrats. I can't seem to find one anywhere.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

They denied that Vindman was the whistleblower and claimed the Whistleblower had spoken to Vindman and was compelled to tattle. And nothing of Vindman's testimony was corroborated as we all read the transcript and know what was said on the phone call.

Vindman was unreliable and had questionable judgment, according to his own outgoing superior, Tim Morrison, the National Security Council’s senior director for European affairs. In fact, Morrison viewed Vindman as so untrustworthy that he opted to exclude him from his conversations with William Taylor, the senior US diplomat in Ukraine.

In addition to that, Vindman is Ukrainian and frequently ignored the chain of command.

Add to that, if you are correct, Vindman lied under oath to Congress when he claimed he was NOT the whistleblower. Of course in his "memoirs" he flat out claimed to be the whistleblower, so which is it??

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/2/wisconsin-probe-finds-2020-e******n-riddled-nursin/

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2020-11-13-e******n-observer-explains-how-nursing-home-v**e-fraud-works/


Whether or not you think the 2000mules movie is credible or not, it sits as evidence yet to be overturned or even heard in a court. It was compiled based upon evidence presented in court after court where the courts refused to hear it for "administrational" reasons.

The cases for e******n f***d on multiple levels are strong and at least should be heard in courts of law. And the SCOTUS should have heard the Texas case. The claims made about other states changing their e******n laws illegally are facts, not even denied by the states who did it.

dwp66

Yep, you would have to go to a source like World Tribune find a good review of 2000 Mules, because you won't find one at Reuters, AP News, Newsweek, The Atlantic, the NYT, or anywhere else that's a legitimate website. Even Fox won't show the film, because they know it's crap. Even William Barr said: “The premise, if you go by five boxes or wh**ever it was, that that’s a mule is just indefensible. The photographic evidence was lacking. It didn’t establish widespread harvesting. If you take two million cell phones and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition, you’re going to find many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes. The premise that’s a ‘mule’ is just indefensible,” Barr added.

World Tribune is infamous for headlines like this one from 2003: “U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction have finally been located.” 

And here's their rating, from Mediabiascheck:

𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈: 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒂, 𝑷𝒐𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒈, 𝑹𝒆𝒋𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆, 𝑳𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒚, 𝑺𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝑭𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝑵𝒆𝒘𝒔.
𝑩𝒊𝒂𝒔 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈: 𝑭𝑨𝑹 𝑹𝑰𝑮𝑯𝑻
𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈: 𝑳𝑶𝑾
𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒚: 𝑼𝑺𝑨
𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝑭𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒐𝒎 𝑹𝒂𝒏𝒌: 𝑴𝑶𝑺𝑻𝑳𝒀 𝑭𝑹𝑬𝑬
𝑴𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒂 𝑻𝒚𝒑𝒆: 𝑾𝒆𝒃𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒆
𝑻𝒓𝒂𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄/𝑷𝒐𝒑𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒚: 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑻𝒓𝒂𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒄
𝑴𝑩𝑭𝑪 𝑪𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈: 𝑳𝑶𝑾 𝑪𝑹𝑬𝑫𝑰𝑩𝑰𝑳𝑰𝑻𝒀

dwp66

"It was compiled based upon evidence presented in court after court where the courts refused to hear it for "administrational" reasons." Nope. 𝑻𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒚 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆. Go read his interview with Philip Bump. From the horse's mouth, mwtk2007. It's obvious you did not read it...

Moreover, it's not up to me, you, or anyone else to prove the movie's assertions are false - it's up to DeSouza to prove they ARE TRUE and he has not done so. And oh, I know about Wisconsin. Now, show me any link to the assertions that "nursing homes v**ed 100% Democrat".

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Bump doesn't know schitt. Deny deny. There is no substance in your denial.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I like how you ignore the links to b****t harvesting in nursing homes.

Given that this is suppressed by the MSM and Google, the fact that this story is found, indicates that there are hundreds more being suppressed.