JimB

It wouldn't be necessary, as you state that "...a future President/Congress will be tempted to circumvent the Constitution in order to fix the damage he and his fellow travelers have caused." All that needs be done is to enforce the Constitution we have had for 200+ years before the nation was "... Fundamentally changed" by the Kenyan Marxist.Socialist Muslim.

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

L.E. Liesner Loc: New Mexico

We should stop trashing Obama, he and his administration are doing a good enough job they do not need us. Now if the "useful i***ts" would only listen!

Babsan

Great compilation of The Muslim Plants accomplishments,good job right on.The sad part the no/lo "adorers" don't get it plus a slew of stupids neither

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

The left wing progs do get it; it's just that they agree with it! They want obummer to do exactly what he is doing (advancing their agenda). Until these people start losing money and benefits, they will continue to applaud obummer. That goes for the "rich" progs as well. When they start losing profits and "special rules" to keep them rich, they will throw obummer under the bus. If they ever have to start using their own money to fund these "entitlement" programs, they'll "cease and desist" in a heartbeat.

jackel

My first v**e was for Ike.I am so sorry we have decomposed since then.I gave 8 years of my youth defending the constitution and would have never believed I would see someone sworn to defend it,destroy it in 4 1/2 yrs.

donnieadair

This is so true. We do not have elected government officials with the guts to stand up to Obama and call him out for the lying, thieving, c***ting criminal he is. Something not being talked about is the HHS sending out their Gestapo to the protests at IRS buildings. Surely these people were conservative Americans that have no history whatsoever showing any tendacies of violence or acts to violate public or private property. I would assume that Obama felt that it was quiet possible that some of the protesters were off duty law enforcement officials and would not be up to the task if there was a problem. Rest assured that the HHS were well armed as they are buying billions of dollars of non-military ammunition. Tried to buy even a 22 caliber load lately? On back order in most places.
The tyrinical rule of the federal government is already here and the average Joes that I know simply same "there is nothing I can do about it".
The post about drinking causing more health problems than smokeing and eating are accurate. Here is the deal, many of us are geneticially predisposed to all three. I am one of them. Prohibition didn't work out to good. What do they have planned for people who are overwight and enjoy smokeing? (these same people also probably drink too). If the people do take a stand now, we are going to be saying that Socialism might not have been so bad after all.

zip98053

I wouldn't give the Clipper too many kudos for this list. It is one that has been around political blogs for some time and most of the items on the list have been debunked. Even the ones that are "true" are half t***hs which, I suppose, is better than being a bald faced lie like the rest of them.

Here's the rebuttal from another blog.

http://www.t***horfiction.com/rumors/o/obama-report-card.htm#.UauCZ8Ln_PA

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pardon me, but the useful i***ts are HELPING him destroy the nation. If you cannot see that, you are beneath the useful i***ts, and merely a USELESS i***t. And, I KNOW you don't know this, but when the nation falls, it falls on you as well as the rest of us who are trying to save it. Look at it this way: you would be doing YOURSELF a favor to join those who want to save the nation from sheer folly and greed, those YOU CALL useful i***ts.

zip98053

I took a little time this AM to chase down one of the absurd claims on this list that, so far, has been listed as "under investigation". It is the claim that Bo's handler is paid $102,000 a year at tax-payer expense. I found where someone had chased this one down.

http://wafflesatnoon.com/2013/02/26/does-obama-pay-dog-trainer-102000-at-tax-payer-expense/

What is it that causes conservatives to h**e Obama so much that they have to continually invent things to reinforce their hatred? Why isn't enough to discuss the real issues rather than the imaginary ones? It's as if the right has no answers for how to deal with America's problems other than to point to Obama and say "it's all his fault," which, of course, is nonsense. If things are screwed up, it is a combination of the President, Congress, and the Courts. From where I'm sitting, a majority of the problem is because this is the most dysfunctional Congress EVER. When Congress is this screwed up, it's OUR fault (yours, mine, and everyone else in America who is an eligible v**er). What needs to be done to fix the problem isn't to continually rail about Obama and make s**t up with no purpose other than to reinforce hatred. H**e isn't a cure for anything.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

As the left would yell, "Show me the proof of hatred from the right for the President". I don't know anyone who h**es Obama, but I know millions who DESPISE his policies, his actions, his propensity to appoint street thugs into the Administration. I am one of those in the millions.

Is there something that you find wrong with opponents voicing their honest opinions? What were your comments when the left was h*****g Bush in effigy and burning him in effigy, not to mention the hyperbole pushed that "Bush lied, people died."?

zip98053

I have no issue with opponents voicing their opinions. What I don't understand are these invented "outrages" that simply are not true. They seem to only serve one purpose which is to stoke the fires of hatred that people have for Obama. Making up a story about his dog trainer is not something that addresses Obama's policies.

When Bush was President, I didn't encourage people to make up lies about him. The fact is that the American people were told time and time again by the Bush Administration, and Bush himself, that there were WMDs in Iraq. Regardless of Bush's motives for going into Iraq, he never would have gotten the support of Congress or the American people without convincing us that there were WMDs. I think that he should have been held accountable when it turned out that there were no WMDs and I think that Bush's opponents were right in attacking him on this. He justified his actions to us on the basis of a falsehood. However, I don't think that the left then went on a splurge of making s**t up about Bush (e.g., Bush's new tractor is serviced by a mechanic that is paid $250,000 at tax payer expense.") Maybe that kind of thing happened but I don't remember it.

So, you say that you h**e Obama's policies: which ones and why? You say that you h**e his actions: which ones and why? You say that you h**e that he hires street thugs into the Administration: who would that be? I sure hope that you are not relying on the stuff in the list that Clipper plagiarized because that stuff mostly isn't true so your hatred of his policies, actions, and hiring decisions just might be based on inaccurate information. Does that matter to you?

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

"The fact is that the American people were told time and time again by the Bush Administration, and Bush himself, that there were WMDs in Iraq."
Are you telling me that you believe the lies about the WMDs?! They WERE there, and while Congress diddled with discussion after discussion and finally, after having seen all the information Bush had, APPROVED going to Iraq, THEN denigrating him for doing what THEY had APPROVED, and claiming he had lied - while all this was going on, I personally watched truck after truck after truck, covered of course, cross over from Iraq into Syria, hauling what even the MEDIA was referring to as WMD. Now I think I know where you get your information - it isn't information. It is propaganda of the DNC variety, and it makes all Democrats look unbelievably stupid.

" However, I don't think that the left then went on a splurge of making s**t up about Bush (e.g.,"
Are you telling me that Obama, with no class whatsoever, has made many accusations about his problems being the result of President Bush - and Obama's followers, like robots repeat the same lies? You've never heard or read this? Do you follow politics much? You obviously listen to the DNC, Chrissy Matthews (with that thrill running up his leg) and that i***t reporter that thinks Obama is a GOD - all of them would prefer President Bush be dead. All the right wants is for ONCE, President Obama do the right thing, the legal thing, the Constitutional thing as he swore to do. If he did those things, the right would revere him, but he has a h**e America streak that is a mile wide and only the blind cannot see it.

PS. I don't really care if you believe me or not. I speak the t***h from knowledge, from experience, and from paying attention, not just now but for over half a century. I don't try to dictate to you or to anyone. I merely offer the t***h that can set all of us free. If you disagree, you are merely turning down an offer than many people such as the German Jews, never received. Think about it.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

The majority of American people were opposed to Obamacare, but it was bulled through, primarily by Harry Reid disallowing Republican input. The American people knew the expenses would be astronomical - and they already ARE, though most of Obamacare doesn't kick in until January, 2014, at which time many NEW taxes will be foisted off onto the American public. And the added expenses aren't half the problem with Obamacare. Loss of freedom is the worst ot the program. The IRS will be the Obamacare policemen. BAD PROGRAM

The Fast and Furious fiasco by the Obama Administration got people k**led, and one of them was a US Border Patrolman. The program was amateurishly handled, recklessly handled, guns were lost and this is all but unforgiveable. BAD PROGRAM

B******ie - Americans denied help that was available, but told by the Administration to "stand down". Several Americans died, but according to Hillary, "What does it matter now WHY they got k**led?" I***t or covering her a**? With her record, and her history, I'll v**e COVERUP. Dems will v**e "irrelevant". HORRIBLY BAD POLICY. HORRIBLE ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO IT AS WELL.

These are merely the issues for which several officials in this administration can and SHOULD be impeached or indicted. They probably never will be because it would be considered to be "non-politic", proper attention be damned. I guess I could fill the afternoon with lesser crimes and misdemeanors, but I don't want to waste my time. You have as much availability to news as I do - in this day and age, "news" is a matter of with whom do you agree? Most is propaganda, NOT news. One must use his wits and his intelligence to know what is and is not news.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

There were[green] WMDs in Iraq. What do you think Saddam used to gas the Kurds at Halabja? The fact that they couldn't be found after all the time Saddam had to move them doesn't negate the fact that he used poison gas (WMD) on the Kurds. Not only did President Bush believe it, but so did Congress, Britain, and several other countries. I'm sure the Kurds believed it in 1988. "The attack k**led between 3,200 and 5,000 people, and injured around 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians;[thousands more died of complications, diseases, and birth defects in the years after the attack. The incident, which has been officially defined as an act of genocide against the Kurdish people in Iraq, was and still remains the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history." Ref. Wikipedia.
So anyone that says Bush is the only one that believed Iraq had WMDs is full of crap! There was at least 2 years for Saddam to get rid of or hide anything else he had for WMDs while stalling the rest of the world with false indignation.