Yes, Kansas v**es to keep a******n rights, but... (Page 3): Yep that right back in January of 1973 the SCOTUS decided that the American people were too stupid to decided on a******n in...

dcmdm85

Yep that right back in January of 1973 the SCOTUS decided that the American people were too stupid to decided on a******n in their individual state so they decided the issue for the American people.... a******n nationwide, on demand without any restrictions right to the moment of birth or even after birth. That is not how is works in a republican form of democracy.... IT " WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES " who decides this issue and other issues well. Remember this when you and I v**e in November midterm e******ns.

dcmdm85

Please remember that Planned Parenthood start out as a way to control the black population, the mental and physical disabled in up state New York by a woman named Margaret Sanger who believes in eugenics so much that a national leaders in 2 countries adopted her policies , one was N**i Germany under Hitler and the other one is China under Mao and his successor. She was one of Hillary Clinton heros

kemmer

dcmdm85 wrote:

She was one of Hillary Clinton heros

Uh-huh. Together with Attila the Hun and Ivan the Terrible. 😂😂😂

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

CarryOn wrote:

I totally agree. I do not think the original inte... (show quote)

what about rape ? CarryOn

CarryOn

jimpack123 wrote:

what about rape ? CarryOn

Rape, incest, medical emergencies ... those are legitimate and those were the arguments used to fight for legalization of a******n. It was never intended to be used as a regular method of birth control, but unfortunately that is what it has evolved into over the decades. Even as newer, safer and more effective methods of birth control have become available ... in many cases for free ... a******n has become too commonplace and too well accepted and, in fact, encouraged ... because it's just easier than prevention and, hey, everybody's doing it so it must be okay. For that, I believe, there is no excuse. Sure, there are exceptions, but that's what it should be--exceptions--and not the rule. A little personal responsibility is all it takes.

Wonttakeitanymore

kemmer wrote:

Hahaha…. You really think Kansas pro lifers and GOP legislators are done with this?
I’m just waiting for the howls of v***r f***d; that’s now what’s going to happen every time Republicans lose.

Would be a good idea to check! Not in Kansas anymore toto

maryla

proud republican wrote:

...Did you see any r**ting from people who are pro life?? Did you see any buildings being set on fire?? Did you see any violence at all??...So people of Kansas have spoken, thanks in part to Conservative Justices who sent Roe back to States.. This how Democracy works!!🙄

yep!!!

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

CarryOn wrote:

Rape, incest, medical emergencies ... those are le... (show quote)

How many women do you know that have actually had an a******n?

Turtle keeper

Tiptop789 wrote:

How many women do you know that have actually had an a******n?

That’s not a fair Question because that information is private. Also women can and do get a******ns without their husbands or boyfriends ever knowing about it. Now if anyone that get an a******n (even the men that get pregnant) should have to register and that would be public information. Then your question would be justifiable.
But sense you ask. Yes I know one.

dcmdm85

Remember what the SCOTUS said on Dobbs, it said the decision on a******n should be return to the states legislature.ie the v**ers of that state , so when the people v**ed to keep a******n in Kansas constitution this what exactly the Dobbs did return it the people v**e for up or down.

CarryOn

Turtle keeper wrote:

That’s not a fair Question because that information is private. Also women can and do get a******ns without their husbands or boyfriends ever knowing about it. Now if anyone that get an a******n (even the men that get pregnant) should have to register and that would be public information. Then your question would be justifiable.
But sense you ask. Yes I know one.

Yes, given the ability of baby k**lers to hide behind confidentiality, we all probably know at least a few. I know a couple .. and one who seriously considered it but chose not to .. happily. And what does that matter? The number of a******ns reported (horrifying), the outrage of pro-a******nists, and the lengths to which they will go to fight ... so loudly and so publicly, including tv ads ... for the ability to legally k**l their babies speaks volumes about how commonplace and accepted it has become.

Ricktloml

CarryOn wrote:

Rape, incest, medical emergencies ... those are le... (show quote)

The part about the rape/incest/health of the mother/health of the baby argument is, all these COMBINED comprise less than 1% of the current a******ns. And were rarely denied an a******n even before Roe V Wade. It is another manufactured issue, promoted by liars

kemmer

Turtle keeper wrote:

That’s not a fair Question because that information is private. Also women can and do get a******ns without their husbands or boyfriends ever knowing about it. Now if anyone that get an a******n (even the men that get pregnant) should have to register and that would be public information. Then your question would be justifiable.
But sense you ask. Yes I know one.

If men could get pregnant, a******n would be a sacrament.

CarryOn

Ricktloml wrote:

The part about the rape/incest/health of the mother/health of the baby argument is, all these COMBINED comprise less than 1% of the current a******ns. And were rarely denied an a******n even before Roe V Wade. It is another manufactured issue, promoted by liars

Yes, I totally agree it is a manufactured issue promoted by liars. The original intent was for a******n to be legalized for the reasons you list, and it was intended to be rare, which fits with the 1% you quote. Unfortunately, that is not the way it turned out. Also, unfortunately, it is still legal in most states, although some will now be able to put reasonable limitations on it--such as a 15-week limit, which should be acceptable to the baby k**lers. But no, the pro-a******nists cannot accept that. They want NO limitations--or else! They mounted a huge campaign in KS, ads filled with lies, as Turtle keeper mentioned, in order to get their way. Look for that to continue from state to state.

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

Turtle keeper wrote:

That’s not a fair Question because that information is private. Also women can and do get a******ns without their husbands or boyfriends ever knowing about it. Now if anyone that get an a******n (even the men that get pregnant) should have to register and that would be public information. Then your question would be justifiable.
But sense you ask. Yes I know one.

It's fair because not everyone gets an ablution for convenience. There are probably many reasons women choose this route and none of them are easy. I would agree you have the right to choose for you, not for someone else. We'll never ever agree on this issue, but that just the way it is.