One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Is Your Mental Health Better Or Worse Since Biden Was Elected?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jul 15, 2022 23:34:30   #
robertv3
 
AmericanEagle wrote:
Hillarious you’re talking about mental health when you’re from the party of the unhinged and it was logical and a vegetable in chief.

Your party has been hijacked every way to Sunday and now you can’t define a woman, believe men can have babies and all the other crazy s**t that goes with it.
How many g****rs are there now? Then you get all the circus freaks t***s,cis or wh**ever. There truly is mental illness in your party and then he should be locked up for the things they do to children. The old days he just called him perverts and would get restraining orders but now they are uploaded and given a platform and we are supposed to just go along with it…..not goona happen
Hillarious you’re talking about mental health when... (show quote)


Define "man".

Reply
Jul 15, 2022 23:43:38   #
robertv3
 
EmilyD wrote:
Someone gave me a copy of Hillary's "What Happened" book. It's in the bathroom next to the toilet in case of toilet paper shortages as a joke. Someone (I don't know who - we had a party) actually used it. I think whoever they were was making a statement. 😀


I gather you're not a Hillary fan, but that the friend who gave you that book might be one.

One time I bought a book by a person I didn't like, just to educate myself in case there was something worthwhile in it. There was! The author was Ann Coulter. I read the first third of a book by her, way back about 15 years ago. The worthwhile thing (for me) was a comparison of the psychologies of Phyllis Schlafly (whom I don't like) and Gloria Steinem (whom I might like). In Coulter's comparison, Shlafly was better because she had a more positive attitude. Shlafly was impressive because she did a lot (a letter writing campaign while raising several children, I think). Steinem was more depressed or less positive-seeming. I still have the same likes and dislikes as before, but Coulter's description of those two women did give me something to think about.

Reply
Dec 11, 2022 14:06:49   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Here’s one.
Two people fall down through a chimney.
At the bottom one comes out with a clean face and the other comes out with a dirty face.
Which one will wash his face first ?


Neither. They were probably women.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2022 14:12:41   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
robertv3 wrote:
Define "man".


Male of the species Human with XY c********es.

Reply
Dec 11, 2022 15:11:44   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
robertv3 wrote:
Define "man".


Seriously? You can’t?

Reply
Dec 12, 2022 00:26:12   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
robertv3 wrote:
I gather you're not a Hillary fan, but the friend who gave you that book might be one.

One time I bought a book by someone; I wouldn't say I liked to educate myself in case there was something worthwhile. There was! The author was Ann Coulter. I read her first third of a book about 15 years ago. The helpful thing (for me) was a comparison of the psychologies of Phyllis Schlafly (whom I don't like) and Gloria Steinem (whom I might like). In Coulter's comparison, Schlafly was better because she had a more positive attitude. Schlafly was impressive because she did a lot (a letter-writing campaign while raising several children, I think). Steinem was more depressed or less positive-seeming. I still have the same likes and dislikes as before, but Coulter's description of those two women did give me something to think about.
I gather you're not a Hillary fan, but the friend ... (show quote)


Gloria Steinem, a threesome with her and Schlafly may be what you need.
Likely with no personal involvement.

Reply
Dec 12, 2022 22:34:04   #
robertv3
 
JFlorio wrote:
Seriously? You can’t?


That's not the point. When people ask for a definition of "woman", they're usually male people who do the asking, and they're usually asking women. Those male people should take on the same kind of task that they are trying to put onto others. They should bind themselves by a definition of what they are supposed to be.

I think you basically understood, but are being deliberately obtuse, just because it's your habit to be recalcitrant.

The people who ask for a definition of "woman", in the political scene, are also being deliberately obtuse. If they're so smart, and want definitions, why don't they say a definition themselves? But they should not insist that other people should be bound by it. It's obviously not just a biological question. It also has to do with factors like roles and expectations. That's _why_ many people (call them group "A") these days are objecting to other people (call them group B) trying to constrain what their (group A's) roles and expectations have to be.

People have a right to self-determination.

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2022 22:39:39   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
WTF are you babbling about? You’re either a woman or a man. I don’t ask for a definition. When I see a male that says he’s a woman I know he’s mentally ill. Doesn’t matter what someone has added or cut off they are what their DNA says. I would have never hired that wacko. If you couldn’t see that wack job was trouble, you’re an i***t. See Joe Biden.
You don’t have a right to self determination. That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, if you’re talking about g****r. What you are is determined from the moment of conception. You’re goofier than a June bug.
robertv3 wrote:
That's not the point. When people ask for a definition of "woman", they're usually male people who do the asking, and they're usually asking women. Those male people should take on the same kind of task that they are trying to put onto others. They should bind themselves by a definition of what they are supposed to be.

I think you basically understood, but are being deliberately obtuse, just because it's your habit to be recalcitrant.

The people who ask for a definition of "woman", in the political scene, are also being deliberately obtuse. If they're so smart, and want definitions, why don't they say a definition themselves? But they should not insist that other people should be bound by it. It's obviously not just a biological question. It also has to do with factors like roles and expectations. That's _why_ many people (call them group "A") these days are objecting to other people (call them group B) trying to constrain what their (group A's) roles and expectations have to be.

People have a right to self-determination.
That's not the point. When people ask for a defin... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 12, 2022 22:50:39   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
He's definitely a mental case. Raw Story? What a complete joke. Much like woody.


Why can’t you dispel any of rawstory jokes .????

Reply
Dec 12, 2022 22:52:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Why can’t you dispel any of rawstory jokes .????


Don’t need to. Only i***ts site raw story as a legitimate source.

Reply
Dec 12, 2022 23:15:27   #
robertv3
 
JFlorio wrote:
WTF are you babbling about? You’re either a woman or a man. I don’t ask for a definition. When I see a male that says he’s a woman I know he’s mentally ill. Doesn’t matter what someone has added or cut off they are what their DNA says. I would have never hired that wacko. If you couldn’t see that wack job was trouble, you’re an i***t. See Joe Biden.
You don’t have a right to self determination. That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, if you’re talking about g****r. What you are is determined from the moment of conception. You’re goofier than a June bug.
WTF are you babbling about? You’re either a woman ... (show quote)


Some people are not as limited as your thinking. All you have to do is leave them alone. Leave it up to them how they want to define themselves.

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2022 23:27:52   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
robertv3 wrote:
Some people are not as limited as your thinking. All you have to do is leave them alone. Leave it up to them how they want to define themselves.


I don’t bother the fruitcakes. Just don’t tell me I have to except their self-definition. You’re not enlightened like you think. You and those like you are enablers of mental illness and perversion. The problem isn’t us leaving them alone. It’s them trying to normalize their illness and say we have to accept it. The agenda the t***s people and other g****r confused groups now want to g***m our children. My advice, don’t. They’ll get hurt.

Reply
Dec 13, 2022 08:34:08   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
Don’t need to. Only i***ts site raw story as a legitimate source.


When have they ever provided false information ?
I don’t know of any lies being rebutted by the right . If you are correct then they shouldn’t still be in business. But , nothing has ever been rebutted by the trumpanzees, only Poopooed .

Reply
Dec 13, 2022 08:59:18   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Milosia2 wrote:
When have they ever provided false information ?
I don’t know of any lies being rebutted by the right . If you are correct then they shouldn’t still be in business. But , nothing has ever been rebutted by the trumpanzees, only Poopooed .


Speak above a 6th grade level and perhaps I will answer you. You are too dumb to converse with.

Reply
Dec 14, 2022 15:58:52   #
AmericanEagle Loc: Indiana
 
woodguru wrote:
This isn't hard to believe, in fact it follows perfect logic. When people are asked the question is your mental health or outlook better or worse since trump was ousted, a much higher number of dems versus conservatives would say their mental outlook is better. This shows that those who believe in conspiracy theories and that the e******n was s****n would say their mental health is negative.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-supporters-2657672316/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=1&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s
This isn't hard to believe, in fact it follows per... (show quote)


74 million Legitimate v**ers feel negative. Majority of Americans feel negative with a vegetable planted in the White House and America in rapid decline. Old feckless Joe is taking us to warp speed in the race to the bottom.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.