One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why is the Supreme Court using religious belief to alter secular law?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
May 21, 2022 09:48:10   #
currahee506
 
There is no such thing as "secular law." "Law" describes the conditions of your relationship with your Creator. If you have a "negative" one you will be "lawless." If you have a "positive" one you will be "lawfully."

Reply
May 21, 2022 10:02:24   #
Liberty Tree
 
Milosia2 wrote:
No such thing as an unborn baby.


Then why do states refer to them as an unborn child in laws making it a crime to cause their death in an illegal act?

Reply
May 21, 2022 10:06:24   #
kemmer
 
Blade_Runner wrote:

The KJV was the primary Bible in our American public, private and church schools,
until the early 1900s when secular progressivism reared its ugly head in American politics.

The KJV is written in a language not spoken in 500 years except by Shakespearean actors.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2022 10:12:23   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
kemmer wrote:
The KJV is written in a language not spoken in 500 years except by Shakespearean actors.


The old Testament predates by several thousand years and is written in Hebrew. So, what is your point?

Reply
May 21, 2022 10:17:01   #
keepuphope Loc: Idaho
 
Milosia2 wrote:
God was not an integral part of all government.
The founders were not Christians,
They were deists.they had a belief in an all knowing God , but that was it.
As I understand that it is a half step away from Atheists.
Religion was intentionally kept out of government.
For the very reason you are trying to inflict it today.


You slander and demean God as the reason when in t***h it's a medical controversy as the "fetus" is a human and a completely separate entity from the mother. She may nurture and feed the child as in ALL NATURE mammals do,but once fully developed is no more a part of the woman's body than it was in utero. It's biology 101 so don't blame religion.

Reply
May 21, 2022 10:31:12   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Milosia2 wrote:
A wizard , truly a wizard.
There are no un born babies.
Because they are not babies until they are born. And take their first breath.


I get it. Makes you feel better to say I’m ok with slaughtering fetuses instead of unborn babies. Google pictures of aborted “fetuses” sometime and tell me what they look like. You and your ilk are evil. However; you are keeping the minority population in check, which is what you r****ts really want.

Reply
May 21, 2022 11:26:12   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
You are so misinformed. Quit believing everything your ELWNJ sites tell you. Some of the founders were diests, but most were Christian. I bet you do not know these facts for example.
Christian church services were held in the Capitol for years.
The first Congress appropriated money to buy Bibles
The first Speaker of the House was a pastor.
The first readers for children in school were filled with Buble stories.
Diests would not see the need for chaplains in Congress.
Educate yourself for these are just a few examples.
You are so misinformed. Quit believing everything ... (show quote)


I will if you will stop trying to rewrite history.
Speculation and intuition are not facts nor are they relative.
I don’t deny they were here , but , they were intentionally kept at arms distance from government.
Otherwise you would now be part of the Taliban .

Oh, wait …..

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2022 11:31:09   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
I get it. Makes you feel better to say I’m ok with slaughtering fetuses instead of unborn babies. Google pictures of aborted “fetuses” sometime and tell me what they look like. You and your ilk are evil. However; you are keeping the minority population in check, which is what you r****ts really want.


R****ts ????
You haven’t seen evil yet.
Are all of the fetuses important it just the White Ones ?



Reply
May 21, 2022 11:32:32   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/the-religious-roots-of-americas-founding-fathers#:~:text=While%20space%20doesn%27t%20allow%20us%20to%20describe%20the,of%20America%27s%20Founding%20Fathers%20becomes%20obvious.%20John%20Witherspoon

I just gave you the t***h dimwit.


This is why Mike Huckabee has been rewriting the books.

Reply
May 21, 2022 11:35:45   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Buddhism
Is the only true Religion.

Reply
May 21, 2022 11:44:23   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/the-religious-roots-of-americas-founding-fathers#:~:text=While%20space%20doesn%27t%20allow%20us%20to%20describe%20the,of%20America%27s%20Founding%20Fathers%20becomes%20obvious.%20John%20Witherspoon

I just gave you the t***h dimwit.


The United Church of God.
The UCG has this all figured out.
You call this proof , but , according to what ?
It’s what the church said.
My
Church of the Big SpinningWheel in the Sky
Says things too.
Can I also claim these as facts ?
You see , compared to what ?
If you believe it then , It’s True !
It’s what Cults are made of !!!!!!!

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2022 11:48:44   #
Skiladi
 
Being against a******n on demand is not religiously connected. K*****g a full term baby and calling it a******n is MURDER! A******n under certain circumstances is warranted, but not up to and even after birth. This is a moral question. Murder is NEVER ok, no matter what you call it. Roe v. Wade was not intended to k**l a viable baby. Medical science has changed and the law needs to be changed along with it.

Reply
May 21, 2022 12:13:51   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Why is the Supreme Court using religious belief to alter secular law?
Alito's draft opinion is full of specious legal and historical language — but it's just religious doctrine in d**g

By THOM HARTMANN
PUBLISHED MAY 10, 2022 2:16PM (EDT)
An activist with The Center for Popular Democracy Action holds a photo of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito as they block an intersection during a demonstration in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
An activist with The Center for Popular Democracy Action holds a photo of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito as they block an intersection during a demonstration in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
view in app
save
This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Democrats are generally disinclined to discuss religion, much less debate it.

They like to point out that Thomas Paine and Benjamin Franklin were famously atheist, Thomas Jefferson and dozens of other high-profile people in the founding generation were deists (a close cousin to atheists and certainly not Christians), and that in two different places the Constitution explicitly rejects religion interfering with government or vice versa.

But it's time to discuss religion whether we like it or not, because it's no longer knocking on our door: Sam Alito just sent it into the house with a no-knock warrant and stun grenades that threaten to catch the place on fire.

Alito's Dobbs v. Jackson draft opinion rests on two main premises.

The first is that the Supreme Court has no business recognizing a "right" that isn't rooted in the nation's "history and tradition."

This right-wing canard has been around for years, and has been used to argue against pretty much ever form of modernity from integrated public schools to, more recently, same-sex marriage. It's a convenient pole around which you can twist pretty much any argument you want, because American history and tradition have been all over the map during the past roughly 240 years.

There you have it in a nutshell !

*** The first is that the Supreme Court has no business recognizing a "right" that isn't rooted in the nation's "history and tradition."***
There is no such right , presently.
Why is the Supreme Court using religious belief to... (show quote)


America was founded on religious freedom sweetie! Even non Christian’s believe in the sanctity of human life unless you worship molech!

Reply
May 21, 2022 12:14:37   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
One only needs to examine the speeches and letters our founding fathers wrote or spoke to know their intentions and God was an integral part of all government


Amen

Reply
May 21, 2022 12:15:24   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Milosia2 wrote:
That covers i**********ns.


What i**********n? No proof!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.