One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why is the Supreme Court using religious belief to alter secular law?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
May 25, 2022 06:37:48   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Religious influence.



No science.

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:09:43   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Ok everything I said was a lie.
Washington won
There is no mention of George Washington's surrender, in any speech, it doesn't exist anywhere. I made it up. OK?
Cornwallis did not tell Washington about the foundations of deep state and how the people would be deceived. And that a Holy War would now begin. And Washington told Cornwallis to go pound sand as the victor. OK? Washington the great general won more battles than he lost. OK?
George Washington was not a master Mason giving his allegiances to the Masonic order under the penalty of death. OK? He did not swear an oath to the constitution repeating the words "the Constitution of the United States" as the law required and it wasn't done using a Masonic bible. OK?
1789 the very First Act "Oath" you omitted it but I'll say for your mind, the preamble says "this Constitution for the United States of America" Not to swear to "the Constitution of the United States - feel better, that fits your thinking and excellent reading skills anyway. Article II, Section 1, para 8, has nothing to do with the instructed words an oath taker is to repeat but for you it defines those words of the oath of office, how you read it. OK?
Somewhere but no one can find it but you evidently, there is a conquest doc that Washington wrote claiming all the spoils of war as the victor. Feel better? You will make a lot money when you produce it to the National Archives.
The 1783 Treaty was written by Washington with the help of Paul Revere, Minutemen and supporting colonist. They claimed they had control of the money and the elector votes. They gave congress their new orders, claimed the Americans were sovereign and free not the States. They awarded nothing to the English. They claimed their right to own their own lands with free and clear title from the King. Claimed their own Rule of law that all 13 Colonies agreed to. Got the right to vote and choose their own currency forms, banking and commerce practices in their Treaty to formally end the hostilities of war. OK? The 1783 King's Treaty does not exist it been debunked by you. OK? The Holy Roman Empire had nothing to do with the Treaty, OK?
The Unam Sanctam and the Treaty of Verona have nothing to do the powers and authority claimed, and explain the relationship between England and the Vatican and how far back it goes. OK? and who is in control.
1791 We the People created our own American private side domestic banking system and currency form. OK?
Washington DC is a part of the United States of America, it is not a corporation nor are any of the States listed as corporations for profit either. OK?
Ok everything I said was a lie. br Washington won... (show quote)
Quite a word salad there.
Lots of dressing.
Sounds alien.
Is it supposed to say something?

Reply
May 25, 2022 11:39:54   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Quite a word salad there.
Lots of dressing.
Sounds alien.
Is it supposed to say something?


Alien to me as well

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2022 10:32:23   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ri-chard wrote:
How you responded has nothing to do with the founder foundations they built in 1781 to 1791. Nothing but spin.

Evading the facts again, diverting from 1781 no doctrine of conquest claiming any of the spoils of war the American patriots fought for. Washington abandoned the American patriots for Land ownership with free and clear title, the right to vote during the founding years, their rule of law choice to be free from the Crown rulers, and private side banking. Stop siding with the enemy! 1783 the Victor of the war made his claims and gave nothing but fishing rights and where to fish to the Americans, while protecting his English land owners. and giving congress orders for what they shall do. Stop your BS
1789 the law was written so no one would take an oath to "this Constitution for the United States of America" It's the law. So again, stop your BS
The founders foundations then were set in 1791 with a foreign banking system so they could be built on into the future. This is how we got the Federal Reserve and the IRS the other foreign NGO entities. Follow the money and stop your BS.
No matter how you try to decieve and divert from the truth, their documented history stands to this date and undisputable with their penned signiturers in 1783...
See the truth is always a short story and one of simple words for understanding. How's your phantacy world story book doing for you?
You know nothing of the British and Vatican relationships. On 18 November 1302, Pope Boniface VIII issued the Papal Bull called "Unum Sanctum." read it and tell us what the Vatican doesn't claim to own.
TREATY OF VERONA 1213. Read it and tell us how the British faired.
How you responded has nothing to do with the found... (show quote)


You seem to have a lot right.
The Federal Reserve Corporation is a pivate corporation owned by the banking cabal families.
The private Federal Reserve Corporation needs to be abolished, the "debt" recinded, and United States notes printed and created.

Reply
May 26, 2022 10:47:21   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
eagleye13 wrote:
You seem to have a lot right.
The Federal Reserve Corporation is a pivate corporation owned by the banking cabal families.
The private Federal Reserve Corporation needs to be abolished, the "debt" recinded, and United States notes printed and created.


We need to go back to Certificates of a known value opposed to a Bill of Debt

Reply
May 26, 2022 11:37:00   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ri-chard wrote:
We need to go back to Certificates of a known value opposed to a Bill of Debt


I am not sure that is possibble with the world awash in phony debt, and very few who understand what is going on.

Who ever goes against the banking scam, will have all the scam forces and there power of the press to defeat any attempt.
Not to mention the government representatives/toadies to ally and protect them.
Ron Paul was the only one to try.

Reply
May 26, 2022 12:08:48   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I am not sure that is possibble with the world awash in phony debt, and very few who understand what is going on.

Whoever goes against the banking scam, will have all the scam forces and there power of the press to defeat any attempt.
Not to mention the government representatives/toadies to ally and protect them.
Ron Paul was the only one to try.


Remember, it's the foreign Federal Reserve's debt notes, and they can keep them, it's their notes of debt. America could easily go back to certificate of value using a basket of natural resources to back the new currency we have in this land of plenty. Say goodbye to their foreign note collector the IRS as well. That responsibility belongs to each State Treasury to contribute to the Federl Governments limited role per the Constitution.

Physical currency exchange centers could be set up at all Treasury locations across the nation.
The largest exchanges would be digital/electronic. The banks have no real cash to match their ledgers, most are just key strokes. Even the retailers don't deposit cash like the use to, their sales are also mostly digital.
transactions.

Strong monetary penalties could be applied to overseas tax shelters for the big whores.
Banks don't truly lend physical money even for a mortage or home equity loan. They give you credit not a loan of real cash, only in the form of a check book to draw against an agreed digital input number.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2022 13:43:54   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Remember, it's the foreign Federal Reserve's debt notes, and they can keep them, it's their notes of debt. America could easily go back to certificate of value using a basket of natural resources to back the new currency we have in this land of plenty. Say goodbye to their foreign note collector the IRS as well. That responsibility belongs to each State Treasury to contribute to the Federl Governments limited role per the Constitution.

Physical currency exchange centers could be set up at all Treasury locations across the nation.
The largest exchanges would be digital/electronic. The banks have no real cash to match their ledgers, most are just key strokes. Even the retailers don't deposit cash like the use to, their sales are also mostly digital.
transactions.

Strong monetary penalties could be applied to overseas tax shelters for the big whores.
Banks don't truly lend physical money even for a mortage or home equity loan. They give you credit not a loan of real cash, only in the form of a check book to draw against an agreed digital input number.
Remember, it's the foreign Federal Reserve's debt ... (show quote)



The only way to stop the Banker's theft is for Congress to create and issue Constitutional Notes as provided in the Constitution.
Article1 Section 8 or 10 as I recall.
A $28 Trillion "debt" for use of "money" from the Fed Rederve banks; all created out of thin air.

Anyone know what the yearly interest on the "debt" is?

The interest many years ago was the 3'rd largest figure on the yearly Federal budget.

Reply
May 26, 2022 14:16:22   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
eagleye13 wrote:
The only way to stop the Banker's theft is for Congress to create and issue Constitutional Notes as provided in the Constitution.
Article1 Section 8 or 10 as I recall.
A $28 Trillion "debt" for use of "money" from the Fed Rederve banks; all created out of thin air.

Anyone know what the yearly interest on the "debt" is?

The interest many years ago was the 3'rd largest figure on the yearly Federal budget.


Imho it's us that are responsible. We are the employers of congress not the employees. We could even perform a Recall vote for their lack of performance in enforcing our wishes/demands.
However, We the People are just too complacent with being recognized as their citizen subjects instead of acting as sovereign men and women.

Reply
May 26, 2022 14:37:35   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ri-chard wrote:
Imho it's us that are responsible. We are the employers of congress not the employees. We could even perform a Recall vote for their lack of performance in enforcing our wishes/demands.
However, .


"We the People are just too complacent with being recognized as their citizen subjects instead of acting as sovereign men and women." - Ri-chard
Yep.
That is the way it is.
The people have been well trained to act as cattle.
Looks like it may not be long for God/Yahwey to bring this mess to a close.

Reply
May 26, 2022 14:47:03   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"We the People are just too complacent with being recognized as their citizen subjects instead of acting as sovereign men and women." - Ri-chard
Yep.
That is the way it is.
The people have been well trained to act as cattle.
Looks like it may not be long for God/Yahwey to bring this mess to a close.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.