A man who is making America great now. The left h**e him for it.
Nov 14, 2022 19:49:23 #
return to updates
I Don't Believe in Elon Musk
by Miles Mathis
First published October 5, 2015
As usual, this is an opinion piece, protected by the US Constitution. It is my personal reading of the published factoids. If you prefer the mainstream reading, you can have it.
Elon Musk is supposed to be worth 13.6 billion. He is supposed to be the CEO of Tesla Motors. He is supposed to be the founder of SpaceX. He is supposed to be the founder of Solar City. He is supposed to be the inventor of Hyperloop. I for one don't believe any of it. Elon Musk looks to me like a person totally manufactured by Intelligence as the f**e human front for all these f**e projects. In this way he is exactly like Mark Zuckerberg, another person I have outed as a probable manufactured entity. When I wrote that paper on Zuckerberg, he was also alleged to be worth 13.6 billion. Coincidence? Nope.
Why do I think that? I think it because Musk's entire Wikipedia page and bio reads like a red f**g. It is nothing but t***sparent BS from top to bottom. We'll start with his family. His mother's maiden name is Haldeman. That is a prominent Jewish name. Elon is also a Jewish name, meaning “oak” in Hebrew. Kimbal, Elon's brother, also has a Jewish name. So why not just admit they are Jewish? I don't know. Maybe they plan on running him for Governor of California or something.
Although we will cover the other red f**gs, I want to skip ahead to the end, to lead with later red f**gs that demand our early attention. I want to lead with them although they come later on the Wikipedia page. Musk has claimed he is a big fan of Margaret Thatcher. What? Only f*****ts and plants are fans of Margaret Thatcher. No real person of any intelligence and scruple is a fan of Margaret Thatcher. Musk is sold as a progressive, but no progressive would claim to be a fan of Thatcher. It doesn't fit his profile at all, and we can only imagine it was worked into his bio as either a clue for people like me or as part of some late promotion of Thatcher and f*****m in general. Actually, I assume it is mainly another plug for privatization. Musk's entire bio is a long plug for privatization. Along with deregulation, privatization is one of the two main planks of neo-f*****m.
Musk has said he is “socially liberal and fiscally conservative”. Was Thatcher socially liberal? Not according to Section 28, which made “promotion” of homosexuality illegal, and which stopped just short of making homosexuality itself illegal again, as in the time of Oscar Wilde. I should think this would be of some concern to Musk, since I don't really buy either one of his marriages. But he doesn't have to be concerned with that, does he, since he lives in the US in 2015, not the UK in 1980. In the US in 2015, homosexuality is being promoted like never before.
So why don't I buy his marriages? Well, in answer to that, I send you to pictures of Musk with his wives and girlfriends. Just Google something like “Musk with Riley”. While any normal heterosexual guy would be getting all the sugar he could from these sweeties, glowing in the perfume, Musk always looks highly uncomfortable.
The girls are often leaning away from him, as there. And look at his hand in his pocket. Discomfort signs all over the place.
Or you can read this 2010 article at Marie Claire written by his alleged first wife Justine. You may find it convincing, but I don't. Just look at the lead photo for the article:
I draw your attention to the three tricycles and two bikes. This is to remind us that Musk is supposed to have five sons by this woman. Not only do we get no photos of the children—which is perhaps understandable—she doesn't mention them once in the article, either by name or in any other way. Mostly she just repeats the story of Musk's rise to fame and fortune, with the occasional plug of her own. Very strange. I would have to say it is the most impersonal article of its kind I have ever read. No, beyond impersonal; it is chilly, almost chilling. It reads like it was put together by a committee, and it may have been. I say that because if we do a people search on Elon Musk, we find no evidence
of these children in the computers. In fact, Intelius doesn't even have an Elon Musk listed in California. Only his father, Errol Musk. InstantCheckMate lists an Elon Musk related to Justine, but the only other relation is a Jennifer. Since Justine's middle initial is J., I assume Jennifer is also her. If these five boys have birth certificates, they should be in the computers. They aren't.
Then we have to read this:
Musk is a self-described American exceptionalist and nationalist, describing himself as "nauseatingly pro-American". According to Musk, the United States is "inarguably the greatest country that has ever existed on Earth", describing it as "the greatest force for good of any country that's ever been". Musk believes outright that there "would not be democracy in the world if not for the United States.”
Nauseating, yes. Believable, no. Again, no real person of any intelligence would be caught saying that in the second decade of the 21st century. Even the American N**i Party is more circumspect than that. Musk has obviously been hired to read these lines provided him by the Pentagon or someplace (except that even the Pentagon isn't that jingoistic these days). Now that I think of it, this reads like copy provided Musk by Henry Kissinger or the CFR. But even in that context, it is over the top. When I read quotes like this, I have to imagine that clues have been inserted into Musk's bio on purpose by someone. I begin to think this is all part of some game: a nationwide contest to see if anyone can see through this. If so, send me the prize.
Although I may be the first to propose Musk is an Intel creation, I am not the only one who has noticed that he appears to be reading from neo-con or f*****t cue-cards. PolicyMic and many other sites have criticized Musk harshly for contributing to anti-science Republican candidates and groups like the Longhorn PAC and the NRCC, confirming my analysis above by saying that
these political calculations betray Musk's persona of a socially-conscious entrepreneur.
His many interviews also betray (or disprove) his created persona of a person with very high intelligence and sk**ls. Although he is sold as some sort of Tony Stark, he comes off as Ron Howard with a bit more hair** and a foreign accent. I don't see any spark there, and in my opinion he looks like just another hired actor. Unfortunately, he's not even a good actor, and if he hadn't been born into a rich family he would have had to work as a crisis actor, like Robbie Parker.
**Actually, it's a toupee, as we can tell by the picture under my title. Musk is 24 there and his hair is very thin in front, so we may assume his new look is augmented in some way. In that more recent photo, he obviously has on a rug. It doesn't really matter, of course, and I wouldn't mention it except for the fact that I am showing Musk is a f**e in all ways.
Although Musk's companies have received 5 billion in government subsidies, Musk says he isn't in favor of government subsidies for companies like his. Instead he has come out in favor of a carbon tax. Obviously, he is just reading from the Teleprompter again there, and isn't concerned with appearing to be consistent. F**e people fronting f**e companies don't have to worry about appearing consistent. It is all about stirring your mind into Musk, I mean Mush. The people behind Musk want all the subsidies they can drink, but then they want to pretend they don't lust for them like they do. They also don't want you to apply for any subsidies, because they don't need the competition. They don't want you to be subsidized; they want you to be taxed.
So why do I think these companies are f**e? We'll start with Musk's links to Mike Griffin. Griffin was head of NASA from 2005 to 2009, but on Musk's page we learn that Griffin also worked for In-Q-Tel, the venture capital arm of the CIA! That is probably the biggest red f**g on the entire page. Curiously, that information has been scrubbed off Griffin's own page. What exactly is In-Q-Tel?
In-Q-Tel invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of keeping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, equipped with the latest in information technology in support of United States intelligence capability.
That is the key to unlocking this whole mystery, so I suggest you read it several times, to let it sink in. I suggest that not only did In-Q-Tel “invest” in all of Musk's companies, it actually created them, and him. We know the CIA creates many front companies, since the mainstream admits it. But it is usually assumed they do this to facilitate domestic covert operations of various sorts. But we have tripped over much evidence companies are created for reasons even more fundamental to the American way. That is to say, a significant part of the US infrastructure is an illusion—an illusion created to facilitate a variety of treasury dips by the very wealthy. Actually, the mainstream press has already reported on a small part of these thefts and grafts. See, for example, Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone reports on the big banks, especially this 2013 report entitled “Everything is R****d”. However, even Taibbi has not yet seen that it is not only via rigging that the rich are becoming richer. It is also via manufacturing f**e companies, f**e portfolios, and f**e projects, by which the treasury can be milked and bilked of billions of dollars of subsidies, grants, and other monies.
So if you thought my mention of Intelligence in paragraph one was just conspiracy theory, think again. Musk has admitted ties to the CIA through Griffin, if nowhere else. You see, before he was hired to head NASA, Griffin was working with Musk on SpaceX, trying to buy old ICBMs from Russia. Again, could you ask for a bigger red f**g? Griffin and Musk were in Russia in 2002 trying to buy ICBMs! We are told one of the Russian engineers spat on Musk, which is about the only thing that makes sense on the entire page. They could probably see he was a spook-baby.
Musk also has some parallels to Yuri Milner, the Russian billionaire who—we are told—is the money for the Fundamental Physics Prize.* Like Milner, Musk went to the Wharton School of Business. He also went to the University of Pennsylvania, which has come up in my previous papers. Both Ezra Pound and Noam Chomsky were probably recruited from there.
But back to SpaceX. The whole project stinks of a con. We are told,
In 2001, Musk conceptualised "Mars Oasis"; a project to land a miniature experimental greenhouse on Mars, containing food crops growing on Martian regolith, in an attempt to regain public interest in space exploration.
That idea is ridiculous for so many reasons it is hard to know where to start. Food crops on Mars? Wouldn't the t***sport costs back to Earth be a little high? Talk about a carbon footprint! Before we start growing food on Mars, shouldn't we hit a few others things first, like, say, getting people there? Who is going to eat that food? I guess they can feed it to the ground squirrels we have seen in NASA's f**e pictures from Mars. Except that those ground squirrels are already eating pretty well it seems, since we have also seen their candy wrappers on the ground.
Also, who is going to water those plants on Mars? Maybe this lady:
Actually, it wasn't any of the Mars anomaly photos that convinced me the Mars missions were f**ed. It was watching this NASA press conference for the Curiosity lander. I recommend you watch it without any later commentary added, so that you can be completely objective. Just ask yourself if these guys seem like real scientists. Notice that they are unable to answer any substantive questions from the audience. Only after you have watched these NASA guys should you return to the anomaly photos. Once you do, your mind will be in a more receptive state and you will start to see what is there.
[Addendum, October 14, 2015. Another strange coincidence, if coincidence it was: I ran into some friends at a local pub this evening and they asked me if I wanted to go with them to a movie. I asked what they were going to see, and they said The Martian. I immediately got a creeping feeling (as I usually do now when I think of any Hollywood movie) and begged off. When I got home, I looked up the film. Guess what it is about? Top spook-baby actor Matt Damon is stranded on Mars. Being a biologist, he is forced to grow his own food in a greenhouse attached to the stranded lander. Curious how this ties into Musk's plan for Mars Oasis, eh? Hollywood is still selling NASA's fictions, almost
50 years later.]
We are told Musk gave up on the ICBMs, which Russia wanted 8 million apiece for, deciding he could get the materials for only $240,000. OK, let me see if I understand this. We are being told the materials to build a rocket large enough to carry an entire greenhouse to Mars will cost only $240,000. In that case, I think we may have been overcharged for the Apollo missions, for which we were billed about 110 billion. I think we may be overcharged now for fighter/bomber jets, which cost up to 2.4 billion apiece (the B2).
Nevertheless, we are told Musk invested 100 million of his fortune into SpaceX. Which brings us to his fortune. At age 24, right out of college, Musk invested $28,000 of his dad's money in a company called Zip2. We are told this company developed an internet city guide for newspapers then going online in 1995. That story is so full of holes it looks like prairie dog town. You can't start a company with $28,000, at least not one that you then sell four years later for 341 million to Compaq. We are told Zip2 “provided online publishing for media companies” and had a contract with the New York Times, but the NYT had been computerized since 1976 and online since 1981. By 1995 it would have already had all the “customized portals” it needed. Compaq also had no use for internet city guides and online publishing portals in 1999, so this sale looks manufactured. I am not the only one noticing that. Take the last link to quora.com and you will see that a lot of people are asking questions about Elon Musk.
It looks to me like this Zip2 story is being told to explain the genesis of Musk's fortune. The same can be said for Musk's alleged involvement with Paypal. At age 28 Musk founded another company, using 10 million from his 22 million profit from selling Zip2. This company, X.com, immediately merged with Confinity, which contained Paypal. So Musk had absolutely nothing to do with founding Paypal, and even according to the mainstream story was only used for his money. He came in on the merger and was only 28, so why would he have been made CEO? Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
I Don't Believe in Elon Musk
by Miles Mathis
First published October 5, 2015
As usual, this is an opinion piece, protected by the US Constitution. It is my personal reading of the published factoids. If you prefer the mainstream reading, you can have it.
Elon Musk is supposed to be worth 13.6 billion. He is supposed to be the CEO of Tesla Motors. He is supposed to be the founder of SpaceX. He is supposed to be the founder of Solar City. He is supposed to be the inventor of Hyperloop. I for one don't believe any of it. Elon Musk looks to me like a person totally manufactured by Intelligence as the f**e human front for all these f**e projects. In this way he is exactly like Mark Zuckerberg, another person I have outed as a probable manufactured entity. When I wrote that paper on Zuckerberg, he was also alleged to be worth 13.6 billion. Coincidence? Nope.
Why do I think that? I think it because Musk's entire Wikipedia page and bio reads like a red f**g. It is nothing but t***sparent BS from top to bottom. We'll start with his family. His mother's maiden name is Haldeman. That is a prominent Jewish name. Elon is also a Jewish name, meaning “oak” in Hebrew. Kimbal, Elon's brother, also has a Jewish name. So why not just admit they are Jewish? I don't know. Maybe they plan on running him for Governor of California or something.
Although we will cover the other red f**gs, I want to skip ahead to the end, to lead with later red f**gs that demand our early attention. I want to lead with them although they come later on the Wikipedia page. Musk has claimed he is a big fan of Margaret Thatcher. What? Only f*****ts and plants are fans of Margaret Thatcher. No real person of any intelligence and scruple is a fan of Margaret Thatcher. Musk is sold as a progressive, but no progressive would claim to be a fan of Thatcher. It doesn't fit his profile at all, and we can only imagine it was worked into his bio as either a clue for people like me or as part of some late promotion of Thatcher and f*****m in general. Actually, I assume it is mainly another plug for privatization. Musk's entire bio is a long plug for privatization. Along with deregulation, privatization is one of the two main planks of neo-f*****m.
Musk has said he is “socially liberal and fiscally conservative”. Was Thatcher socially liberal? Not according to Section 28, which made “promotion” of homosexuality illegal, and which stopped just short of making homosexuality itself illegal again, as in the time of Oscar Wilde. I should think this would be of some concern to Musk, since I don't really buy either one of his marriages. But he doesn't have to be concerned with that, does he, since he lives in the US in 2015, not the UK in 1980. In the US in 2015, homosexuality is being promoted like never before.
So why don't I buy his marriages? Well, in answer to that, I send you to pictures of Musk with his wives and girlfriends. Just Google something like “Musk with Riley”. While any normal heterosexual guy would be getting all the sugar he could from these sweeties, glowing in the perfume, Musk always looks highly uncomfortable.
The girls are often leaning away from him, as there. And look at his hand in his pocket. Discomfort signs all over the place.
Or you can read this 2010 article at Marie Claire written by his alleged first wife Justine. You may find it convincing, but I don't. Just look at the lead photo for the article:
I draw your attention to the three tricycles and two bikes. This is to remind us that Musk is supposed to have five sons by this woman. Not only do we get no photos of the children—which is perhaps understandable—she doesn't mention them once in the article, either by name or in any other way. Mostly she just repeats the story of Musk's rise to fame and fortune, with the occasional plug of her own. Very strange. I would have to say it is the most impersonal article of its kind I have ever read. No, beyond impersonal; it is chilly, almost chilling. It reads like it was put together by a committee, and it may have been. I say that because if we do a people search on Elon Musk, we find no evidence
of these children in the computers. In fact, Intelius doesn't even have an Elon Musk listed in California. Only his father, Errol Musk. InstantCheckMate lists an Elon Musk related to Justine, but the only other relation is a Jennifer. Since Justine's middle initial is J., I assume Jennifer is also her. If these five boys have birth certificates, they should be in the computers. They aren't.
Then we have to read this:
Musk is a self-described American exceptionalist and nationalist, describing himself as "nauseatingly pro-American". According to Musk, the United States is "inarguably the greatest country that has ever existed on Earth", describing it as "the greatest force for good of any country that's ever been". Musk believes outright that there "would not be democracy in the world if not for the United States.”
Nauseating, yes. Believable, no. Again, no real person of any intelligence would be caught saying that in the second decade of the 21st century. Even the American N**i Party is more circumspect than that. Musk has obviously been hired to read these lines provided him by the Pentagon or someplace (except that even the Pentagon isn't that jingoistic these days). Now that I think of it, this reads like copy provided Musk by Henry Kissinger or the CFR. But even in that context, it is over the top. When I read quotes like this, I have to imagine that clues have been inserted into Musk's bio on purpose by someone. I begin to think this is all part of some game: a nationwide contest to see if anyone can see through this. If so, send me the prize.
Although I may be the first to propose Musk is an Intel creation, I am not the only one who has noticed that he appears to be reading from neo-con or f*****t cue-cards. PolicyMic and many other sites have criticized Musk harshly for contributing to anti-science Republican candidates and groups like the Longhorn PAC and the NRCC, confirming my analysis above by saying that
these political calculations betray Musk's persona of a socially-conscious entrepreneur.
His many interviews also betray (or disprove) his created persona of a person with very high intelligence and sk**ls. Although he is sold as some sort of Tony Stark, he comes off as Ron Howard with a bit more hair** and a foreign accent. I don't see any spark there, and in my opinion he looks like just another hired actor. Unfortunately, he's not even a good actor, and if he hadn't been born into a rich family he would have had to work as a crisis actor, like Robbie Parker.
**Actually, it's a toupee, as we can tell by the picture under my title. Musk is 24 there and his hair is very thin in front, so we may assume his new look is augmented in some way. In that more recent photo, he obviously has on a rug. It doesn't really matter, of course, and I wouldn't mention it except for the fact that I am showing Musk is a f**e in all ways.
Although Musk's companies have received 5 billion in government subsidies, Musk says he isn't in favor of government subsidies for companies like his. Instead he has come out in favor of a carbon tax. Obviously, he is just reading from the Teleprompter again there, and isn't concerned with appearing to be consistent. F**e people fronting f**e companies don't have to worry about appearing consistent. It is all about stirring your mind into Musk, I mean Mush. The people behind Musk want all the subsidies they can drink, but then they want to pretend they don't lust for them like they do. They also don't want you to apply for any subsidies, because they don't need the competition. They don't want you to be subsidized; they want you to be taxed.
So why do I think these companies are f**e? We'll start with Musk's links to Mike Griffin. Griffin was head of NASA from 2005 to 2009, but on Musk's page we learn that Griffin also worked for In-Q-Tel, the venture capital arm of the CIA! That is probably the biggest red f**g on the entire page. Curiously, that information has been scrubbed off Griffin's own page. What exactly is In-Q-Tel?
In-Q-Tel invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of keeping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, equipped with the latest in information technology in support of United States intelligence capability.
That is the key to unlocking this whole mystery, so I suggest you read it several times, to let it sink in. I suggest that not only did In-Q-Tel “invest” in all of Musk's companies, it actually created them, and him. We know the CIA creates many front companies, since the mainstream admits it. But it is usually assumed they do this to facilitate domestic covert operations of various sorts. But we have tripped over much evidence companies are created for reasons even more fundamental to the American way. That is to say, a significant part of the US infrastructure is an illusion—an illusion created to facilitate a variety of treasury dips by the very wealthy. Actually, the mainstream press has already reported on a small part of these thefts and grafts. See, for example, Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone reports on the big banks, especially this 2013 report entitled “Everything is R****d”. However, even Taibbi has not yet seen that it is not only via rigging that the rich are becoming richer. It is also via manufacturing f**e companies, f**e portfolios, and f**e projects, by which the treasury can be milked and bilked of billions of dollars of subsidies, grants, and other monies.
So if you thought my mention of Intelligence in paragraph one was just conspiracy theory, think again. Musk has admitted ties to the CIA through Griffin, if nowhere else. You see, before he was hired to head NASA, Griffin was working with Musk on SpaceX, trying to buy old ICBMs from Russia. Again, could you ask for a bigger red f**g? Griffin and Musk were in Russia in 2002 trying to buy ICBMs! We are told one of the Russian engineers spat on Musk, which is about the only thing that makes sense on the entire page. They could probably see he was a spook-baby.
Musk also has some parallels to Yuri Milner, the Russian billionaire who—we are told—is the money for the Fundamental Physics Prize.* Like Milner, Musk went to the Wharton School of Business. He also went to the University of Pennsylvania, which has come up in my previous papers. Both Ezra Pound and Noam Chomsky were probably recruited from there.
But back to SpaceX. The whole project stinks of a con. We are told,
In 2001, Musk conceptualised "Mars Oasis"; a project to land a miniature experimental greenhouse on Mars, containing food crops growing on Martian regolith, in an attempt to regain public interest in space exploration.
That idea is ridiculous for so many reasons it is hard to know where to start. Food crops on Mars? Wouldn't the t***sport costs back to Earth be a little high? Talk about a carbon footprint! Before we start growing food on Mars, shouldn't we hit a few others things first, like, say, getting people there? Who is going to eat that food? I guess they can feed it to the ground squirrels we have seen in NASA's f**e pictures from Mars. Except that those ground squirrels are already eating pretty well it seems, since we have also seen their candy wrappers on the ground.
Also, who is going to water those plants on Mars? Maybe this lady:
Actually, it wasn't any of the Mars anomaly photos that convinced me the Mars missions were f**ed. It was watching this NASA press conference for the Curiosity lander. I recommend you watch it without any later commentary added, so that you can be completely objective. Just ask yourself if these guys seem like real scientists. Notice that they are unable to answer any substantive questions from the audience. Only after you have watched these NASA guys should you return to the anomaly photos. Once you do, your mind will be in a more receptive state and you will start to see what is there.
[Addendum, October 14, 2015. Another strange coincidence, if coincidence it was: I ran into some friends at a local pub this evening and they asked me if I wanted to go with them to a movie. I asked what they were going to see, and they said The Martian. I immediately got a creeping feeling (as I usually do now when I think of any Hollywood movie) and begged off. When I got home, I looked up the film. Guess what it is about? Top spook-baby actor Matt Damon is stranded on Mars. Being a biologist, he is forced to grow his own food in a greenhouse attached to the stranded lander. Curious how this ties into Musk's plan for Mars Oasis, eh? Hollywood is still selling NASA's fictions, almost
50 years later.]
We are told Musk gave up on the ICBMs, which Russia wanted 8 million apiece for, deciding he could get the materials for only $240,000. OK, let me see if I understand this. We are being told the materials to build a rocket large enough to carry an entire greenhouse to Mars will cost only $240,000. In that case, I think we may have been overcharged for the Apollo missions, for which we were billed about 110 billion. I think we may be overcharged now for fighter/bomber jets, which cost up to 2.4 billion apiece (the B2).
Nevertheless, we are told Musk invested 100 million of his fortune into SpaceX. Which brings us to his fortune. At age 24, right out of college, Musk invested $28,000 of his dad's money in a company called Zip2. We are told this company developed an internet city guide for newspapers then going online in 1995. That story is so full of holes it looks like prairie dog town. You can't start a company with $28,000, at least not one that you then sell four years later for 341 million to Compaq. We are told Zip2 “provided online publishing for media companies” and had a contract with the New York Times, but the NYT had been computerized since 1976 and online since 1981. By 1995 it would have already had all the “customized portals” it needed. Compaq also had no use for internet city guides and online publishing portals in 1999, so this sale looks manufactured. I am not the only one noticing that. Take the last link to quora.com and you will see that a lot of people are asking questions about Elon Musk.
It looks to me like this Zip2 story is being told to explain the genesis of Musk's fortune. The same can be said for Musk's alleged involvement with Paypal. At age 28 Musk founded another company, using 10 million from his 22 million profit from selling Zip2. This company, X.com, immediately merged with Confinity, which contained Paypal. So Musk had absolutely nothing to do with founding Paypal, and even according to the mainstream story was only used for his money. He came in on the merger and was only 28, so why would he have been made CEO? Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Nov 14, 2022 19:52:13 #
It all not fit above here the whole 11 pages on Musk Boy for all you believers NOT …….. keep reading
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Nov 15, 2022 13:37:09 #
Army wrote:
It all not fit above here the whole 11 pages on Musk Boy for all you believers NOT …….. keep reading
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Nov 15, 2022 13:57:44 #
Army wrote:
Jackie Boy there you go again Musk already got you shutting down free Speach ( get it ) Musk got his ….. stuck so far up you believe anything even ridicule others . You need put your toy hero’s up . Your FUBR
I guess you're muttering about Twitter the c****e site that banns anyone who speaks the t***h!
So, you can not understand the true facts! That is why you are in such turmoil all the time.
You can bet your ass Musk will fix it pronto.
Tell me, you call yourself army...is that short for the Russian army?
Nov 15, 2022 14:03:45 #
Army wrote:
It all not fit above here the whole 11 pages on Musk Boy for all you believers NOT …….. keep reading
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
Time has told! Here's a refresher from 2015: http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
LOL, Miles Mathis, is a dyed-in-the-wool, conspiracy theorist. He was an agent for Jack Ruby, the k**ler of Oswald before he had a chance to prove anything.
We can see who you are now!
Nov 15, 2022 15:46:17 #
Capt-jack wrote:
LOL, Miles Mathis, is a dyed-in-the-wool, conspiracy theorist. He was an agent for Jack Ruby, the k**ler of Oswald before he had a chance to prove anything.
We can see who you are now!
We can see who you are now!
Nov 16, 2022 13:32:16 #
Army
You are a false prophet.
You are a master of deceit.
Lucifer is your master.
You are a false prophet.
You are a master of deceit.
Lucifer is your master.
Nov 16, 2022 14:59:57 #
Capt-jack wrote:
Army
You are a false prophet.
You are a master of deceit.
Lucifer is your master.
You are a false prophet.
You are a master of deceit.
Lucifer is your master.
Wow Jackie boy you really showing your true colors of Hell ! Showing your the f**e ! Are you saved an repented of your sins an a true believer You have attacked me insulted me called me names an made false accusations about me even personal . You have tried get me kicked off here ( don’t lie ) . That’s how you play .
When I stand up you get mad an cry like a baby your very immature especially when someone don’t share your view an kiss your As. . To say something so immature out prospect or or sense you are the evil one .
Wrong Color You bleed blue Jackie boy …………I bleed 🩸 Red . Life is in the blood Jesus shed His Blood for me Amen.
You like throwing words & game around making jokes you should be about Discussing matters of t***h . Everyone can’t be right but can’t be wrong ether if trying find t***h . You need look at stuff more as a debate & interesting points we all have them I understand there are some Plane don’t care or refuse see an try reach but lot people like read see points on interest even so all articles aren’t always right all points.
As far as your C*******t and liberal remarks that you want to make to me I have told you iam not any that an people here that know me . All but you seems so you like to play games all because of Musk boy an some kinda Animosity that you like to start . An you started it long ago . If you don’t like what I say stop answering my post . I really don’t care .
Nov 20, 2022 08:34:01 #
Army wrote:
Wow Jackie boy you really showing your true colors... (show quote)
Yes, I have little doubt you are an agent of Lucifer!
Nov 20, 2022 08:41:26 #
Nov 20, 2022 13:08:27 #
Capt-jack wrote:
Yes, I have little doubt you are an agent of Lucifer!
Jackie boy you are the Deceiver of Satan . Let’s hear your testimony of God .
Nov 20, 2022 13:40:27 #
Capt-jack wrote:
Elon Musk is checking all the right boxes to make the left h**e him. Will, that's a plus for me.
That right there defines mental r****dation, piss the left off and it's all good
Nov 21, 2022 13:09:59 #
woodguru wrote:
That right there defines mental r****dation, piss the left off and it's all good
Are you, army's father?
Nov 21, 2022 15:05:04 #
Capt-jack wrote:
Are you, army's father?
You need go back your Musk boy cave Jackie boy ! Your get hurt
Nov 23, 2022 09:49:47 #
Army wrote:
You need go back your Musk boy cave Jackie boy ! Your get hurt
suck it
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.