One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Biden Theorizes Homeless Could Have Armed Texas Synagogue Suspect
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 19, 2022 18:16:41   #
son of witless
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Biden Theorizes Homeless Could Have Armed Texas Synagogue Suspect

President Joe Biden on Sunday suggested that the gunman in the Colleyville, Texas, synagogue hostage situation obtained his weapon from the homeless population, then seconds later went on to push for gun control while talking with reporters in Philadelphia.

Although the president admitted that he did not have all the facts of the case, in which a British national identified as Malik Faisal Akram engaged in a lengthy standoff Saturday at the Congregation Beth Israel synagogue that ended in his own death, Biden still felt free to comment on where Akram may have received gotten a weapon.

“I don’t have all the facts, nor does the attorney general. But, allegedly, the assertion was he got the weapons on the street,” Biden said, according to the White House transcript. “He purchased them when he landed. And — and it turns out there apparently were no bombs that we know of.

“But — and, allegedly, he purchased it on the street,” he added seconds later. “Now what that means, I don’t know. Whether he purchased it from an individual in a homeless shelter or a homeless community, or whether — because that’s where he said he was — it’s hard to tell. I just don’t know.”

Directly after those remarks, Biden then decided to turn things overtly political when a reporter asked about the “ramifications” for restricting gun ownership.

“The guns are — we should be — the idea of background checks are critical. But you can’t stop something like this if someone is on the street buying something from somebody else on the street. Except that there’s too — there’s so many guns that have been sold of late; it’s just ridiculous,” Biden said.

“And it’s because of the failure of us to focus as hard as we should and as consistent as we should on gun purchases, gun sales, ghost guns, and a whole range of things that I’m trying to do.”

Now, it’s entirely possible that Akram could purchased a gun “in a homeless shelter” or a “homeless community.” Illegal guns, like illegal drugs, can be purchased anywhere. But the real problems are anti-Semitism and apparently extremist Islamist ideology.

The hostage-taker, identified as 44-year-old Malik Faisal Akram, said he was a supporter of Aafia Sidiqqi, a Pakistani woman linked to al-Qaeda who is serving a lengthy prison term in Fort Worth, Texas, according to Fox News.

Even though Biden still wanted to dish out a progressive talking point, he said that he does not know the motive of the dead suspect who held four people against their will.

“No, I don’t. I — there’s speculation, but I’m not going to get into that. I will — I’m going to have a press conference on Wednesday, and I’ll be happy to go into detail of what I know in detail at that time.”

Hopefully, his news conference will focus on the constant peril of anti-Semitism globally and terrorism as opposed to stumping for a politically d******e cause.

If the president continues to move forward with a gun control narrative on this horrifying event, it will be lost in the partisan noise and lose the actual meaning.

According to The Dallas Morning News, Akram told authorities he wanted to speak to Sidiqqui, whose nickname is “Lady Al-Qaeda.”

The Islamic State Group and the Taliban have offered to trade hostages for Sidiqqi, the newspaper reported.

All four hostages, including Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, were safe after the hours-long incident.

“I am grateful for my family. I am grateful for the CBI Community, the Jewish Community, the Human Community,” the rabbi wrote on Facebook. “I am grateful that we made it out. I am grateful to be alive.”

In another statement, according to The Associated Press, Cytron-Walker said the synagogue’s security training had helped him and the other hostages survive.

“In the last hour of our hostage crisis, the gunman became increasingly belligerent and threatening,” Cytron-Walker’s statement said, according to the AP. “Without the instruction we received, we would not have been prepared to act and flee when the situation presented itself.”

Meanwhile, the FBI is continuing its investigation.

“The FBI’s Evidence Response Team (ERT) will continue processing evidence at the synagogue. At this time, there is no indication that other individuals are involved,” FBI Dallas told Fox News in an email.

It’s truly a blessing that everybody is safe, but these individuals and their families still deserve justice to know what happened.

And a president using the incident to score cheap political points isn’t helping.

https://f**gandcross.com/biden-theorizes-homeless-could-have-armed-texas-synagogue-suspect/

What a complete I***T we have for a President!!!
Biden Theorizes Homeless Could Have Armed Texas Sy... (show quote)


The ignorant rantings of old White Guy Joe. I betcha when Old Joe goes down in flames in 2024, the loony tune Left decides that their mistake was having a Straight White Guy running everything. They will go total Gay T*********red Multi Minority young whipper snapper for their next President.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 18:20:09   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
son of witless wrote:
The ignorant rantings of old White Guy Joe. I betcha when Old Joe goes down in flames in 2024, the loony tune Left decides that their mistake was having a Straight White Guy running everything. They will go total Gay T*********red Multi Minority young whipper snapper for their next President.


I don't look for Joe to run in 2024. I look for Harris to be forced to resign so the crooked Dems can select "THEIR" VP. Then Joe will be forced to resign and the Dems will be left with the new VP that they selected. Which will be just as bad as Joe or worse.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 18:37:19   #
son of witless
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
I don't look for Joe to run in 2024. I look for Harris to be forced to resign so the crooked Dems can select "THEIR" VP. Then Joe will be forced to resign and the Dems will be left with the new VP that they selected. Which will be just as bad as Joe or worse.
I don't look for Joe to run in 2024. I look for H... (show quote)


It's funny how we all thought Kamala would stab Joe in the back and take his place, but Joe uses her for the one thing that has worked for him. She is so stupid that nobody wants her to replace him. He found the one Democrat who could make him look like a fracking genius and made her his Vice Perpetrator.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 18:56:50   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
son of witless wrote:
It's funny how we all thought Kamala would stab Joe in the back and take his place, but Joe uses her for the one thing that has worked for him. She is so stupid that nobody wants her to replace him. He found the one Democrat who could make him look like a fracking genius and made her his Vice Perpetrator.



Reply
Jan 20, 2022 11:09:04   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
son of witless wrote:
It's funny how we all thought Kamala would stab Joe in the back and take his place, but Joe uses her for the one thing that has worked for him. She is so stupid that nobody wants her to replace him. He found the one Democrat who could make him look like a fracking genius and made her his Vice Perpetrator.


She is his insurance policy. "If you dump me you get her".

Reply
Jan 20, 2022 19:15:41   #
son of witless
 
nonalien1 wrote:
She is his insurance policy. "If you dump me you get her".


Just imagine if Joe had picked a woman of ability. By now Pelosi an Schumer would have pushed Joe to abdicate. Then again, I can't think of any woman in the Democratic Party who fits that description, though most would outshine Kamala.

Reply
Jan 20, 2022 19:43:44   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
son of witless wrote:
Just imagine if Joe had picked a woman of ability. By now Pelosi an Schumer would have pushed Joe to abdicate. Then again, I can't think of any woman in the Democratic Party who fits that description, though most would outshine Kamala.


Tulsi Gabbard would be best choice the Dems have for President ....but the shun her.

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2022 06:59:54   #
American Vet
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Tulsi Gabbard would be best choice the Dems have for President ....but the shun her.



Reply
Jan 21, 2022 19:47:48   #
son of witless
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Tulsi Gabbard would be best choice the Dems have for President ....but the shun her.


She'd make Joe look really bad.

Reply
Jan 21, 2022 20:00:07   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
son of witless wrote:
She'd make Joe look really bad.


Make no mistake. Tulsi is a liberal. She’s just not far left.

Reply
Jan 21, 2022 20:30:51   #
son of witless
 
JFlorio wrote:
Make no mistake. Tulsi is a liberal. She’s just not far left.


I said it before. Bill Clinton tacked right, when his first midterm went bad. Joe Biden is so controlled by the loony Left, that he can't go right. Instead of changing his policies, he will try to convince Americans to not believe their lying eyes and believe him.

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2022 20:35:53   #
American Vet
 
JFlorio wrote:
Make no mistake. Tulsi is a liberal. She’s just not far left.


I do not disagree: But a centrist type liberal would be a real challenge.

Reply
Jan 21, 2022 20:35:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
son of witless wrote:
I said it before. Bill Clinton tacked right, when his first midterm went bad. Joe Biden is so controlled by the loony Left, that he can't go right. Instead of changing his policies, he will try to convince Americans to not believe their lying eyes and believe him.


As long as Americans pay more for Gas and goods they will not be swayed by i***t Joe and the Democrats.

Reply
Jan 21, 2022 20:38:01   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
American Vet wrote:
I do not disagree: But a centrist type liberal would be a real challenge.


Politically she’s in a tough spot. She’s too far left for people like me, and to far right for the progressive base of the Democrat party. She’s also way to attractive to remain a liberal.

Reply
Jan 21, 2022 20:42:41   #
American Vet
 
JFlorio wrote:
Politically she’s in a tough spot. She’s too far left for people like me, and to far right for the progressive base of the Democrat party. She’s also way to attractive to remain a liberal.


Yes, but I suspect the 'progressive' leftoids are about to become a minority......

And she would certainly appeal to the independents - which is where most e******ns are determined.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.