One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
V**er Picture I. D. Yes or no? Why? #1
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 18, 2022 12:37:41   #
Ricktloml
 
4430 wrote:
V**er ID's are a MUST period !

No one can do much of anything now a days without one and the lie about poor people can't get one is that just a bald face lie


It is worse than a bald face lie...it is an excuse to be able to c***t!

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 14:21:04   #
TruePatriot49 Loc: The Democratic People's Republic Rhode Island
 
Ricktloml wrote:
It is worse than a bald face lie...it is an excuse to be able to c***t!


Democrats can't win without c***ting and that includes importing millions of wet backs to be replacement v**ers. These wet backs are being sent to red states to replace those who died from c***d19 which was started by Dr. Fauchi in a level 4 CDC lab in the USA. He sent it to Canada and they forwarded it to W***n China.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 01:01:50   #
JW
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Here are two.
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) and the Freedom to V**e Act (S.2747),


John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) Basically, this act is an attempt to reverse two rulings by the Supreme court of unconstitutional v****g laws. It further destroys what is left of the Federal Republic by making all state e******n acts subject to Congressional review.

Freedom to V**e Act (S.2747) Puts state acts addressing political redistricting into Congressional control. Makes state laws for v****g subject to Congressional oversight. The bill expands v***r r**********n (e.g., automatic and same-day registration) and v****g access (e.g., v**e-by-mail and early v****g). It also limits removing v**ers from v**er rolls. In other words, like the previously cited bill, it destroys what is left of the Federal Republic we have had for 238 years.

Both acts make c***ting easier and place state control of v****g into the hands of the majority party in Washington DC.

For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1) This was the original attempt to wrest control of e******n law from the states and cede it to Washington DC. It is the precursor to the Freedom to V**e Act and contains the same features.

They do contain additional specifications but what I have noted here is the most worrisome/dangerous.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 07:09:49   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
JW wrote:
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) Basically, this act is an attempt to reverse two rulings by the Supreme court of unconstitutional v****g laws. It further destroys what is left of the Federal Republic by making all state e******n acts subject to Congressional review.

Freedom to V**e Act (S.2747) Puts state acts addressing political redistricting into Congressional control. Makes state laws for v****g subject to Congressional oversight. The bill expands v***r r**********n (e.g., automatic and same-day registration) and v****g access (e.g., v**e-by-mail and early v****g). It also limits removing v**ers from v**er rolls. In other words, like the previously cited bill, it destroys what is left of the Federal Republic we have had for 238 years.

Both acts make c***ting easier and place state control of v****g into the hands of the majority party in Washington DC.

For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1) This was the original attempt to wrest control of e******n law from the states and cede it to Washington DC. It is the precursor to the Freedom to V**e Act and contains the same features.

They do contain additional specifications but what I have noted here is the most worrisome/dangerous.
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) ... (show quote)



Reply
Jan 19, 2022 07:37:56   #
TruePatriot49 Loc: The Democratic People's Republic Rhode Island
 
JW wrote:
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) Basically, this act is an attempt to reverse two rulings by the Supreme court of unconstitutional v****g laws. It further destroys what is left of the Federal Republic by making all state e******n acts subject to Congressional review.

Freedom to V**e Act (S.2747) Puts state acts addressing political redistricting into Congressional control. Makes state laws for v****g subject to Congressional oversight. The bill expands v***r r**********n (e.g., automatic and same-day registration) and v****g access (e.g., v**e-by-mail and early v****g). It also limits removing v**ers from v**er rolls. In other words, like the previously cited bill, it destroys what is left of the Federal Republic we have had for 238 years.

Both acts make c***ting easier and place state control of v****g into the hands of the majority party in Washington DC.

For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1) This was the original attempt to wrest control of e******n law from the states and cede it to Washington DC. It is the precursor to the Freedom to V**e Act and contains the same features.

They do contain additional specifications but what I have noted here is the most worrisome/dangerous.
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) ... (show quote)



JW, ALL of these "v****g rights " bills are totally Unconstitutional. The Constitution states that State legislatures are to decide all laws pertaining to v****g. You can't just make a law to change the Constitution. You need an ammendment. Democrats need to actually read the Constitution or have someone read it to them.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 09:59:39   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
TruePatriot49 wrote:
JW, ALL of these "v****g rights " bills are totally Unconstitutional. The Constitution states that State legislatures are to decide all laws pertaining to v****g. You can't just make a law to change the Constitution. You need an ammendment. Democrats need to actually read the Constitution or have someone read it to them.


I'm not sure if the Democrats can read nor understand it if they could read !

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 17:22:22   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Ricktloml wrote:
I registered to v**e over 50 years ago. I carry my v***r r**********n card, (but have never been asked to produce it, neither in a moderately large city, where I lived when I was younger, nor in the small/rural community I now live outside of.) It does not have my picture on it, but I do have a photo on my driver's license, which no one asks to see either. V**e integrity is a must. Producing an official photo ID of some/any kind should be a requirement/showing up in person to v**e, (with exceptions for the obvious reasons,) should also be required. In some counties people risk their lives to v**e...standing/waiting in line should not be considered an obstacle. I'm not sure I am comfortable with fingerprinting, but it seems at one time years ago it was required to renew my driver's license, still don't feel right about it being on the v**er's registration card, photo...no problem.
I registered to v**e over 50 years ago. I carry my... (show quote)


Thanks for a good on topic post. As most on this thread are. I agree with you, especially about never having to show any proof of who you are. Anyone could walk into my precinct and claim they are anyone on the old outdated v****g lists and get to v**e. Just have some scribble that looks somewhat similar to what is next to the name. And they don't really look at that and are not in any way, experts. I am waiting for the day I go to v**e and find someone v**ed in my name, without proof of being me. Now, we could go round and round and eventually let me v**e with a provisional b****t. But who is to know if my b****t would be counted. And if it is counted, it is still diminished by the v**er that falsely used my name, and like everyone else at that precinct, and in the total e******n, our v**e is worth less then a full honest v**e. Thanks for your input.
Logically Right

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 17:23:25   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
TruePatriot49 wrote:
Democrats can't win without c***ting and that includes importing millions of wet backs to be replacement v**ers. These wet backs are being sent to red states to replace those who died from c***d19 which was started by Dr. Fauchi in a level 4 CDC lab in the USA. He sent it to Canada and they forwarded it to W***n China.


Please, stay on topic. V**er I. D.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 17:25:44   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
JW wrote:
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) Basically, this act is an attempt to reverse two rulings by the Supreme court of unconstitutional v****g laws. It further destroys what is left of the Federal Republic by making all state e******n acts subject to Congressional review.

Freedom to V**e Act (S.2747) Puts state acts addressing political redistricting into Congressional control. Makes state laws for v****g subject to Congressional oversight. The bill expands v***r r**********n (e.g., automatic and same-day registration) and v****g access (e.g., v**e-by-mail and early v****g). It also limits removing v**ers from v**er rolls. In other words, like the previously cited bill, it destroys what is left of the Federal Republic we have had for 238 years.

Both acts make c***ting easier and place state control of v****g into the hands of the majority party in Washington DC.

For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1) This was the original attempt to wrest control of e******n law from the states and cede it to Washington DC. It is the precursor to the Freedom to V**e Act and contains the same features.

They do contain additional specifications but what I have noted here is the most worrisome/dangerous.
John R. Lewis V****g Rights Advancement Act (S.4) ... (show quote)


Thanks for that clarification. Yes, they are bad bills meant to strip us, especially Republicans of their v****g rights. And v**er I. D. is one of the points in those bill and why I am looking for an intelligent conversation on just that topic alone.

Logically Right

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 17:26:17   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
TruePatriot49 wrote:
JW, ALL of these "v****g rights " bills are totally Unconstitutional. The Constitution states that State legislatures are to decide all laws pertaining to v****g. You can't just make a law to change the Constitution. You need an ammendment. Democrats need to actually read the Constitution or have someone read it to them.


Totally agree.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 17:37:07   #
JW
 
TruePatriot49 wrote:
JW, ALL of these "v****g rights " bills are totally Unconstitutional. The Constitution states that State legislatures are to decide all laws pertaining to v****g. You can't just make a law to change the Constitution. You need an ammendment. Democrats need to actually read the Constitution or have someone read it to them.


True, but the Dems have been acting as if we have no Constitution for a long time now. The Left has h**ed the Constitution since it was adopted. Their "living document" argument is their basis for acting unconstitutionally since Justice John Marshall.

The Founders gave us a means to keep the Constitution relevant to the times. We inherited a Supreme Court that thinks it don't need no stinkin' amendments.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 17:49:04   #
Ricktloml
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Thanks for a good on topic post. As most on this thread are. I agree with you, especially about never having to show any proof of who you are. Anyone could walk into my precinct and claim they are anyone on the old outdated v****g lists and get to v**e. Just have some scribble that looks somewhat similar to what is next to the name. And they don't really look at that and are not in any way, experts. I am waiting for the day I go to v**e and find someone v**ed in my name, without proof of being me. Now, we could go round and round and eventually let me v**e with a provisional b****t. But who is to know if my b****t would be counted. And if it is counted, it is still diminished by the v**er that falsely used my name, and like everyone else at that precinct, and in the total e******n, our v**e is worth less then a full honest v**e. Thanks for your input.
Logically Right
Thanks for a good on topic post. As most on this t... (show quote)


There is a difference in the small, rural community...most people know you, (especially the poll workers where you go to v**e,) so it would be hard for someone to claim they are you. But that s no excuse for not having picture ID to v**e. So what if you have to prove who you are

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.