One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Guns Do K**l...
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 2, 2021 10:25:41   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Ferrous wrote:
The myth of "Guns don't k**l, people k**l people" has finally been proven wrong.

Alex Baldwin said he never pulled the trigger. The gun fired on it's own when he was drawing it from his holster.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59499237

Sometimes an automatic can fire if the safety is damaged or a worn holster presses the trigger... I can't find anyway reason for a vintage Colt 45 to fire without pulling the trigger or dropping it.

It has been reported that the gun was in his hand and pointing it at the camera when the weapon fired.

Can anyone explained how this weapon fired without Baldwin pulling the trigger. I have already ruled out it being modified with a "Hair Trigger" and then used as a prop weapon.
The myth of "Guns don't k**l, people k**l peo... (show quote)


Easy - it was a β€œmiracle”. You are welcome. 😁😁🀣🀣

(Yes, I recognized the satire.πŸ˜‰)

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 10:37:13   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
SGM B wrote:
Easy - it was a β€œmiracle”. You are welcome. 😁😁🀣🀣

(Yes, I recognized the satire.πŸ˜‰)


Finally... Thanks SGM B... I was beginning to think I twisted the satire a bit too hard and it came back and bit me in the a**.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 11:11:08   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
Update:

Now the assistant director Dave Hall (who handed the gun to Baldwin) believes that Baldwin didn't pull the trigger.

""The entire time Baldwin had his finger outside the trigger guard, parallel to the barrel, and that he told me since day one he thought it was a misfire."

https://nypost.com/2021/12/02/rust-ad-backs-alec-baldwin-says-he-didnt-pull-trigger/

Is this possible with that type of revolver?

To me, it looks like Baldwin and Hall are putting the entire blame on the young (24) Armorer Hannah Gutierrez.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/armorer-rust-film-set-says-producers-overruled-her-safety-requests-2021-10-29/

I imagine a whole "Shiver of Lawyers" are lining up to cash in on this one.



Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2021 11:39:37   #
Justice101
 
Ferrous wrote:
In Baldwin's world, that is exactly what he is saying... The gun k**led the woman.

I'm asking how this vintage Colt 45 fired a round without Baldwin pulling the trigger... unless the trigger had been modified with an extremely Hair Trigger. The Sherriff has the revolver so Baldwin's claim can be proven or not.

What I think is funny is how you are responding to this thread... of course guns don't k**l people, people k**l people. ...The irony (or BS) is Baldwin saying the gun k**led the woman.
In Baldwin's world, that is exactly what he is say... (show quote)


Whew! I'm glad that this is cleared up! Now we have to tell the looney lefties that SUVs don't k**l people without drivers; like the lying DNCCP media has been reporting about the Washeka Christmas parade massacre.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 13:14:19   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Ferrous wrote:
Update:

Now the assistant director Dave Hall (who handed the gun to Baldwin) believes that Baldwin didn't pull the trigger.

""The entire time Baldwin had his finger outside the trigger guard, parallel to the barrel, and that he told me since day one he thought it was a misfire."

https://nypost.com/2021/12/02/rust-ad-backs-alec-baldwin-says-he-didnt-pull-trigger/

Is this possible with that type of revolver?

To me, it looks like Baldwin and Hall are putting the entire blame on the young (24) Armorer Hannah Gutierrez.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/armorer-rust-film-set-says-producers-overruled-her-safety-requests-2021-10-29/

I imagine a whole "Shiver of Lawyers" are lining up to cash in on this one.
Update: br br Now the assistant director Dave Hal... (show quote)





I'm glad someone saw the satire and that we got that cleared up because for a moment there I thought you went off into the deep-end of leftism. Phew! Baldwin is definitely trying to project blame on the Armorer.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 17:02:47   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Ferrous wrote:
Update:

Now the assistant director Dave Hall (who handed the gun to Baldwin) believes that Baldwin didn't pull the trigger.

""The entire time Baldwin had his finger outside the trigger guard, parallel to the barrel, and that he told me since day one he thought it was a misfire."

https://nypost.com/2021/12/02/rust-ad-backs-alec-baldwin-says-he-didnt-pull-trigger/

Is this possible with that type of revolver?

To me, it looks like Baldwin and Hall are putting the entire blame on the young (24) Armorer Hannah Gutierrez.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/armorer-rust-film-set-says-producers-overruled-her-safety-requests-2021-10-29/

I imagine a whole "Shiver of Lawyers" are lining up to cash in on this one.
Update: br br Now the assistant director Dave Hal... (show quote)

Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made (Pietta) 1873 Colt 45 SAA replica.

I owned a Colt model 1873 SAA in 357 magnum, which also fired the .38 Special cartridge. Made by Colt, it was a mighty fine pistol. However, if not properly maintained, this particular pistol can be a very dangerous gun.

The hammer has three notches that engage the trigger sear. When you cock a Colt SAA, you will hear and feel three distinct clicks as the hammer is pulled back.

The first notch is the safety position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back about a quarter of an inch, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the first notch. This prevents the firing pin from resting against the primer in the cartridge in the firing chamber, and is the preferred position for safely holstering and carrying a fully loaded pistol of this type. In this position, the trigger cannot be pulled.

(Note: if this particular pistol is carried with the hammer down, it is advisable to have no cartridge loaded in the firing chamber.)

The second notch is the half-cock position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back just past half way, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the second notch. This position frees the cylinder to rotate for loading. In this position also the trigger cannot be pulled.

The third notch is the firing position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer all the way back until the trigger sear engages the third notch and the pistol is ready to fire.

If a pistol of this type has seen extensive use, as is probably the case with movie prop guns, and the pistol has not been properly checked and maintained, it is possible, even probable, that the hammer notches and/or the trigger sear are worn, damaged or even broken. If so, the Colt SAA is a very dangerous gun. It can fire without touching the trigger.

Accidents don't just happen, they are caused, most often through a series of mistakes, errors in judgement, negligence, violations of safety protocols, and so on.

In the event on the Rust movie set, the Colt replica in question was used by production crews for live target practice, they experienced at least two accidental discharges (they were not clear on this), and this should have been a red f**g indicating the pistol was not safe and that it should have been thoroughly checked by a qualified armorer or gun smith.

The big problem with the Rust movie production was the extremely limited budget - $7 million - so they were not able to hire top dollar professional production crews. Some members of the production staff walked off the set due to safety violations, the assistant director had a history of unsafe practices on a movie set, and the armorer they hired was inexperienced - her second movie - and she was reluctant to take the job.

Things added up, from all I have read on the event, poor planning, lack of organization, incomplete story boards, discontent among crew members, hiring inexperienced crews, carelessness along the chain of custody for firearm maintenance and handling, and, of course, C***d restrictions.

The movie armorer, more than anyone else, is responsible for the mechanical condition of all firearms used in movie productions. The armorer, Hanna Gutierrez-Reed, was hired to fill two positions on production staff which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer, she claims she was understaffed, undertrained and overruled by her bosses when she tried to improve safety on the set.

In any case, if the Colt pistol was, in fact, defective, particularly if the trigger sear was worn or broken, it is entirely possible for the gun to fire without pulling the trigger.

We may never know all the details on what actually happened, but so far, lawsuits have been filed, but no criminal charges. The big question investigators are pursuing is how live rounds were loaded into the pistol.

So, until and if we know for certain the chain of events leading up to the accident. I am giving Baldwin the benefit of the doubt.

It may be proper for the actor to determine if the gun is loaded, but the mechanical condition of the firearm is the armorer's responsibility.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 17:44:41   #
Elwood Loc: Florida
 
Ferrous wrote:
The myth of "Guns don't k**l, people k**l people" has finally been proven wrong.

Alex Baldwin said he never pulled the trigger. The gun fired on it's own when he was drawing it from his holster.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59499237

Sometimes an automatic can fire if the safety is damaged or a worn holster presses the trigger... I can't find anyway reason for a vintage Colt 45 to fire without pulling the trigger or dropping it.

It has been reported that the gun was in his hand and pointing it at the camera when the weapon fired.

Can anyone explained how this weapon fired without Baldwin pulling the trigger. I have already ruled out it being modified with a "Hair Trigger" and then used as a prop weapon.
The myth of "Guns don't k**l, people k**l peo... (show quote)


The local cops don't buy his story!

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2021 18:28:38   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made (Pietta) 1873 Colt 45 SAA replica.

I owned a Colt model 1873 SAA in 357 magnum, which also fired the .38 Special cartridge. Made by Colt, it was a mighty fine pistol. However, if not properly maintained, this particular pistol can be a very dangerous gun.

The hammer has three notches that engage the trigger sear. When you cock a Colt SAA, you will hear and feel three distinct clicks as the hammer is pulled back.

The first notch is the safety position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back about a quarter of an inch, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the first notch. This prevents the firing pin from resting against the primer in the cartridge in the firing chamber, and is the preferred position for safely holstering and carrying a fully loaded pistol of this type. In this position, the trigger cannot be pulled.

(Note: if this particular pistol is carried with the hammer down, it is advisable to have no cartridge loaded in the firing chamber.)

The second notch is the half-cock position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back just past half way, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the second notch. This position frees the cylinder to rotate for loading. In this position also the trigger cannot be pulled.

The third notch is the firing position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer all the way back until the trigger sear engages the third notch and the pistol is ready to fire.

If a pistol of this type has seen extensive use, as is probably the case with movie prop guns, and the pistol has not been properly checked and maintained, it is possible, even probable, that the hammer notches and/or the trigger sear are worn, damaged or even broken. If so, the Colt SAA is a very dangerous gun. It can fire without touching the trigger.

Accidents don't just happen, they are caused, most often through a series of mistakes, errors in judgement, negligence, violations of safety protocols, and so on.

In the event on the Rust movie set, the Colt replica in question was used by production crews for live target practice, they experienced at least two accidental discharges (they were not clear on this), and this should have been a red f**g indicating the pistol was not safe and that it should have been thoroughly checked by a qualified armorer or gun smith.

The big problem with the Rust movie production was the extremely limited budget - $7 million - so they were not able to hire top dollar professional production crews. Some members of the production staff walked off the set due to safety violations, the assistant director had a history of unsafe practices on a movie set, and the armorer they hired was inexperienced - her second movie - and she was reluctant to take the job.

Things added up, from all I have read on the event, poor planning, lack of organization, incomplete story boards, discontent among crew members, hiring inexperienced crews, carelessness along the chain of custody for firearm maintenance and handling, and, of course, C***d restrictions.

The movie armorer, more than anyone else, is responsible for the mechanical condition of all firearms used in movie productions. The armorer, Hanna Gutierrez-Reed, was hired to fill two positions on production staff which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer, she claims she was understaffed, undertrained and overruled by her bosses when she tried to improve safety on the set.

In any case, if the Colt pistol was, in fact, defective, particularly if the trigger sear was worn or broken, it is entirely possible for the gun to fire without pulling the trigger.

We may never know all the details on what actually happened, but so far, lawsuits have been filed, but no criminal charges. The big question investigators are pursuing is how live rounds were loaded into the pistol.

So, until and if we know for certain the chain of events leading up to the accident. I am giving Baldwin the benefit of the doubt.

It may be proper for the actor to determine if the gun is loaded, but the mechanical condition of the firearm is the armorer's responsibility.
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made... (show quote)


For anyone who might not understand, a single action revolver can NOT be fired unless the hammer is cocked - unless the pistol is dropped with hammer on loaded cylinder.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 19:08:29   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
SGM B wrote:
For anyone who might not understand, a single action revolver can NOT be fired unless the hammer is cocked - unless the pistol is dropped with hammer on loaded cylinder.
If the trigger sear is broken or sufficiently worn, it will not engage any of the hammer notches when the hammer is pulled to cock the gun. Without touching the trigger, releasing the hammer will fire the gun.

If any of the hammer notches are sufficiently worn, damaged or broken, it is possible to have an accidental discharge.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 19:22:45   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
So the matter can be resolved by a forensic investigation of the weapon. They have the gun in question so all of this will come out in court

Thanks Blade_Runner and SGM B for the info

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 19:29:03   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made (Pietta) 1873 Colt 45 SAA replica.

I owned a Colt model 1873 SAA in 357 magnum, which also fired the .38 Special cartridge. Made by Colt, it was a mighty fine pistol. However, if not properly maintained, this particular pistol can be a very dangerous gun.

The hammer has three notches that engage the trigger sear. When you cock a Colt SAA, you will hear and feel three distinct clicks as the hammer is pulled back.

The first notch is the safety position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back about a quarter of an inch, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the first notch. This prevents the firing pin from resting against the primer in the cartridge in the firing chamber, and is the preferred position for safely holstering and carrying a fully loaded pistol of this type. In this position, the trigger cannot be pulled.

(Note: if this particular pistol is carried with the hammer down, it is advisable to have no cartridge loaded in the firing chamber.)

The second notch is the half-cock position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back just past half way, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the second notch. This position frees the cylinder to rotate for loading. In this position also the trigger cannot be pulled.

The third notch is the firing position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer all the way back until the trigger sear engages the third notch and the pistol is ready to fire.

If a pistol of this type has seen extensive use, as is probably the case with movie prop guns, and the pistol has not been properly checked and maintained, it is possible, even probable, that the hammer notches and/or the trigger sear are worn, damaged or even broken. If so, the Colt SAA is a very dangerous gun. It can fire without touching the trigger.

Accidents don't just happen, they are caused, most often through a series of mistakes, errors in judgement, negligence, violations of safety protocols, and so on.

In the event on the Rust movie set, the Colt replica in question was used by production crews for live target practice, they experienced at least two accidental discharges (they were not clear on this), and this should have been a red f**g indicating the pistol was not safe and that it should have been thoroughly checked by a qualified armorer or gun smith.

The big problem with the Rust movie production was the extremely limited budget - $7 million - so they were not able to hire top dollar professional production crews. Some members of the production staff walked off the set due to safety violations, the assistant director had a history of unsafe practices on a movie set, and the armorer they hired was inexperienced - her second movie - and she was reluctant to take the job.

Things added up, from all I have read on the event, poor planning, lack of organization, incomplete story boards, discontent among crew members, hiring inexperienced crews, carelessness along the chain of custody for firearm maintenance and handling, and, of course, C***d restrictions.

The movie armorer, more than anyone else, is responsible for the mechanical condition of all firearms used in movie productions. The armorer, Hanna Gutierrez-Reed, was hired to fill two positions on production staff which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer, she claims she was understaffed, undertrained and overruled by her bosses when she tried to improve safety on the set.

In any case, if the Colt pistol was, in fact, defective, particularly if the trigger sear was worn or broken, it is entirely possible for the gun to fire without pulling the trigger.

We may never know all the details on what actually happened, but so far, lawsuits have been filed, but no criminal charges. The big question investigators are pursuing is how live rounds were loaded into the pistol.

So, until and if we know for certain the chain of events leading up to the accident. I am giving Baldwin the benefit of the doubt.

It may be proper for the actor to determine if the gun is loaded, but the mechanical condition of the firearm is the armorer's responsibility.
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made... (show quote)


A perfect storm of screw-ups.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2021 20:12:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
dtucker300 wrote:
A perfect storm of screw-ups.
You could put it that way, I suppose. But how is it possible to hold one man responsible for a perfect storm of screw-ups? That political tactic is very familiar.



Reply
Dec 2, 2021 20:23:58   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
You could put it that way, I suppose. But how is it possible to hold one man responsible for a perfect storm of screw-ups? That political tactic is very familiar.


A perfect storm of several people screwing up things, but ultimately one person held and fired the gun and he is now trying to place the blame elsewhere, on everyone, except himself.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 20:33:16   #
Justice101
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made (Pietta) 1873 Colt 45 SAA replica.

I owned a Colt model 1873 SAA in 357 magnum, which also fired the .38 Special cartridge. Made by Colt, it was a mighty fine pistol. However, if not properly maintained, this particular pistol can be a very dangerous gun.

The hammer has three notches that engage the trigger sear. When you cock a Colt SAA, you will hear and feel three distinct clicks as the hammer is pulled back.

The first notch is the safety position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back about a quarter of an inch, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the first notch. This prevents the firing pin from resting against the primer in the cartridge in the firing chamber, and is the preferred position for safely holstering and carrying a fully loaded pistol of this type. In this position, the trigger cannot be pulled.

(Note: if this particular pistol is carried with the hammer down, it is advisable to have no cartridge loaded in the firing chamber.)

The second notch is the half-cock position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer back just past half way, then ease it forward until the trigger sear engages the second notch. This position frees the cylinder to rotate for loading. In this position also the trigger cannot be pulled.

The third notch is the firing position. With finger off the trigger, pull the hammer all the way back until the trigger sear engages the third notch and the pistol is ready to fire.

If a pistol of this type has seen extensive use, as is probably the case with movie prop guns, and the pistol has not been properly checked and maintained, it is possible, even probable, that the hammer notches and/or the trigger sear are worn, damaged or even broken. If so, the Colt SAA is a very dangerous gun. It can fire without touching the trigger.

Accidents don't just happen, they are caused, most often through a series of mistakes, errors in judgement, negligence, violations of safety protocols, and so on.

In the event on the Rust movie set, the Colt replica in question was used by production crews for live target practice, they experienced at least two accidental discharges (they were not clear on this), and this should have been a red f**g indicating the pistol was not safe and that it should have been thoroughly checked by a qualified armorer or gun smith.

The big problem with the Rust movie production was the extremely limited budget - $7 million - so they were not able to hire top dollar professional production crews. Some members of the production staff walked off the set due to safety violations, the assistant director had a history of unsafe practices on a movie set, and the armorer they hired was inexperienced - her second movie - and she was reluctant to take the job.

Things added up, from all I have read on the event, poor planning, lack of organization, incomplete story boards, discontent among crew members, hiring inexperienced crews, carelessness along the chain of custody for firearm maintenance and handling, and, of course, C***d restrictions.

The movie armorer, more than anyone else, is responsible for the mechanical condition of all firearms used in movie productions. The armorer, Hanna Gutierrez-Reed, was hired to fill two positions on production staff which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer, she claims she was understaffed, undertrained and overruled by her bosses when she tried to improve safety on the set.

In any case, if the Colt pistol was, in fact, defective, particularly if the trigger sear was worn or broken, it is entirely possible for the gun to fire without pulling the trigger.

We may never know all the details on what actually happened, but so far, lawsuits have been filed, but no criminal charges. The big question investigators are pursuing is how live rounds were loaded into the pistol.

So, until and if we know for certain the chain of events leading up to the accident. I am giving Baldwin the benefit of the doubt.

It may be proper for the actor to determine if the gun is loaded, but the mechanical condition of the firearm is the armorer's responsibility.
Best info I have is the pistol was an Italian made... (show quote)


Not only did the gun fire by itself, but it also pointed at two people by itself according to Baldwin.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 21:14:29   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
If the trigger sear is broken or sufficiently worn, it will not engage any of the hammer notches when the hammer is pulled to cock the gun. Without touching the trigger, releasing the hammer will fire the gun.

If any of the hammer notches are sufficiently worn, damaged or broken, it is possible to have an accidental discharge.


Not without the hammer pulled back. Right?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.