The second warning may be generic to all firearms. The warning in my owners manual for my AR carbine has WARNING: IF THIS FIREARM IS CARELESSLY OR IMPROPERLY HANDLED, UNINTENTIONAL DISCHARGE COULD RESULT AND COULD CAUSE INJURY, DEATH AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY.

Read this one again. It applies to the Colt SAA revolver.
WARNING: THIS REVOLVER HAS BEEN RECREATED FROM A HISTORIC DESIGN
AND IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO HANDLE WHEN LOADED.

I owned a Colt model 1873 SAA revolver and I owned a number of modern double action revolvers, such as an S&W Model 27, 357 magnum.

A firearm designed 150 years ago is a very different gun than one of modern design. I know this from experience with both.

The myth of "Guns don't k**l, people k**l people" has finally been proven wrong.

Alex Baldwin said he never pulled the trigger. The gun fired on it's own when he was drawing it from his holster.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59499237

Sometimes an automatic can fire if the safety is damaged or a worn holster presses the trigger... I can't find anyway reason for a vintage Colt 45 to fire without pulling the trigger or dropping it.

It has been reported that the gun was in his hand and pointing it at the camera when the weapon fired.

Can anyone explained how this weapon fired without Baldwin pulling the trigger. I have already ruled out it being modified with a "Hair Trigger" and then used as a prop weapon.

So true. However, if you look at my response, I pointed out that "This (insert gun name here) is extremely dangerous to handle when loaded" because every firearm is generically dangerous to handle when loaded.

The warning you printed from the 1873 replica did not say "this firearm is dangerous because it can likely malfunction due to (poor craftsmanship, poor quality or worn parts, user ignorance of how firearms work," etc., or some such other euphemism.

I am of the opinion that this dead horse has been beaten enough already. I am satisfied to let the justice system work out the details.