One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
The alarming message behind the GOP's embrace of Kyle Rittenhouse
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 24, 2021 21:09:31   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
The punk lived with his mother in Illinois, his father had custody every other weekend..

what sort of job did the 17 year old have that was worth driving to Kenosha for? The kid had no drivers lic, so how did he travel? Walking? this was a very bad event, yet you lie and repeat other lies in order to make it seem worst then it truly was.. what a republican thing to do..


I have not uttered a single lie. If I am incorrect, please provide evidence. Your statement is full of unproven opinions. I thought better of you.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:11:21   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
permafrost wrote:
Gee for dumb.. he is not out.. his bail was set at 5 million $$$..

the deed was bad enough, why the hell lie about it???


He was out on bail at the time he murdered six people and injured a multitude more. That may be the context of that comment.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:17:12   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
That a person is acting legally in intentionally carrying a lethal weapon to a volatile public situation and that's ok regardless of provocation or consequence to others.

That if a person is carrying a gun and feels afraid or threatened, they can legally k**l others who are not carrying a lethal weapon and there will be no consequences.

If you assault a person with a skateboard they can shoot you dead and be just fine.

Apparently fear of each other is now more protected than actual human lives.

Its a much worse crime to buy a gun legally and then give it to your friend than it is to shoot and k**l people you are afraid of, and people who want guns to be legal applaud this.

Um yeah I do find the implications terrifying for our country.

I don't think Kyle was there as part of a well regulated m*****a, and yes there should be consequences when my ill considered action directly results in the death of others, regardless of intention.

If we stick with all this, we will turn our country into a shooting gallery that does not value human life.
That a person is acting legally in intentionally c... (show quote)


Most of that is prejudiced opinion, and most of it is wrong. However, let's concentrate on the last line.
You mean the way it was projected to happen in Texas and the other Constitutional carry states? Right.
No one values life more than I do. Therefore please do not attack me, my friends, or my family. I honestly do not know if I could shoot someone for attacking me. I think I might hesitate. But for my kids or grandkids? The attacker will be dead faster than a p*******e with a skateboard.

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 21:20:57   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Big dog wrote:
He WAS out on $1,000 bond when he used the suv as a weapon.
NOW he’s in jail on 5 million dollars bail!!!
Try reading and stop thinking, you aren’t qualified !!


Good rebuttal. I laughed when I read his post. Perm is usually not that thick headed. I think, like Dashy, this subject is stressing his ability to twist and spin beyond his designed safety limits.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:25:36   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Good rebuttal. I laughed when I read his post. Perm is usually not that thick headed. I think, like Dashy, this subject is stressing his ability to twist and spin beyond his designed safety limits.



Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:32:41   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
do you think some may see this as a green light to shoot down others in the street and walk away free?

to say an unarmed person was a danger when you hold an AR-15 in you hands is a real stretch..


No stretch at all. The first was physically trying to take Kyle's weapon AFTER repeatedly announcing he was going to k**l Kyle.
The second one attacked Kyle with a potentially lethal blunt object (skateboard) after another knocked Kyle down.
The last guy was shot by Kyle ONLY after he aimed a loaded glock handgun at Kyle.
Besides, you just argued that a $1000 bail "sounded right" for Brooks, who was a lifelong offender, and was arrested for multiple crimes, including attempted murder by vehicle. NOW you are arguing that Kyle's NOT GUILTY verdict will be a "green light" to shoot down people in the street????
Your logic train has left the tracks.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 21:35:39   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
permafrost wrote:
Are you nuts? i never defended the $1000 bail... I made the point that after these k*****gs he is not walking the street and bail for this offense is 5 million $$$..

I will add, $1000 sounds about right for those offenses you listed. however much we would like we can not keep the dork off the streets for what he may do in the future. And this time that future offense was very horrible..

A child died today, making his total k**led to be 6.. no one is trying to defend him in anyway..
Are you nuts? i never defended the $1000 bail... I... (show quote)


A $ 1000 dollar bail for running over his girl friend seems right to you? That's more in line with drunk in public. Heck graffiti is $5000 bail for a first offense. But regardless it don't matter now. But he should be on a no bail hold for k*****g 6 people and disrupting the lives many more. But you would probably invite him to dinner and let him date your daughter

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 21:43:41   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Why? You haven't a clue?


THIS coming from the meme master? LOL!

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 22:30:10   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Bad Bob wrote:
I don't read minds.


If you did, it would just be more confusing to you than things already are.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 22:38:21   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
nonalien1 wrote:
A $ 1000 dollar bail for running over his girlfriend seems right to you? That's more in line with drunk in public. Heck graffiti is $5000 bail for a first offense. But regardless it doesn't matter now. But he should be on a no-bail hold for k*****g 6 people and disrupting the lives of many more. But you would probably invite him to dinner and let him date your daughter


Frosty, the criminals champion.
The lowest level of scumbag criminals or politicians the better.

Reply
Nov 24, 2021 23:08:44   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Another devastating rebuttal from an intellectual giant.

You know, of ALL the h**eful, evil, disingenuous, disrespectful, ugly, and just plain nasty things Big Bad Bob says and does, and there are a LOT of them, his use of a great character like Calvin is one of the most vile.


I agree Calvin is cool . Bad Bob is a jerk.

Reply
 
 
Nov 24, 2021 23:12:34   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
RandyBrian wrote:
I AM curious about something. The left media and the left on OPP repeat over and over Kyle took his rifle ACROSS STATE LINES!!
It has been irrefutably established that he did NOT carry the weapon from Illinois into Wisconsin, and carrying the weapon IN Wisconsin was perfectly legal.
But, just for conjectures sake, if he HAD carried the rifle across a state line, would it have been illegal at age 17? Under federal law, or state law?


I don't know but the fact remains, he didn't take it across state lines. They keep repeating that lie over adn over again. I***ts!

Reply
Nov 25, 2021 01:16:44   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
PeterS wrote:
I have to disagree here. Republicans had no choice because had Rittenhouse had been found guilty then everything they stand for would come into question. I mean Rittenhouse did what every one of them has stated they stand for. After all, he bore arms to protect personal property and used those arms when he felt his life in danger. That's the party platform on the second amendment. To lose would cause everything they stand for to come into question and leave themselves open to every criticism they face on the second amendment.

So the message is the same: arm yourselves to protect personal property--it doesn't have to be yours--and to defend yourselves from all the e-vile people in the world--namely liberals...
I have to disagree here. Republicans had no choice... (show quote)


If the liberals wouldn't have started the defund the police crap maybe we wouldn't have to carry guns around every where we go to feel safe
As for every thing the republicans stand for if your talking about the Constitution where do you find fault in that assessment?

Reply
Nov 25, 2021 17:31:35   #
jelun
 
Did you actually read the article?
Do you understand the point?

nwtk2007 wrote:
Another lying article. Kenosha was his hood. His dad lived there and he visited often and, he worked in Kenosha. It's just right up the road form his home.

This article continues the lies and is a worthless piece of trash.

Reply
Nov 25, 2021 17:45:49   #
jelun
 
If you were able to read the article you might understand the problem.



Michael Rich wrote:
The youngster "legally" defended himself.

What's the problem?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.