Many of us still think the e******n w*s f********t (Page 3): Our judicial branch that was hijacked by the lib-progs years ago will never hear the thousands of legitimate claims of...

elledee

Mikeyavelli wrote:

Baloney. The courts want nothing to do with exposing the s****n e******n. Their excuse was No Standing, not No Evidence.
No judge wants to be the guy who upsets the rotten apple cart.

Our judicial branch that was hijacked by the lib-progs years ago will never hear the thousands of legitimate claims of v**er and b****t fraud. The proof positive that it happened is obvious when you take a look at what happened in Texas where they threw out 2 and a half million illegal b****ts. Apparently several other states didn't throw out theirs.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

woodguru wrote:

Your point is as backwards as your party...

You don't prove something didn't happen, failing to prove it did is the proof that it didn't...

Not true.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

Lots of evidence! First rule of dictatorship is to own the media!!

That is true and that is scary !!

Wonttakeitanymore

nwtk2007 wrote:

And yet, like Ted Cruz, we are told that they are ... (show quote)

We don’t think it, we absolutely know it!! A bunch of rich fools and c*******ts bought us out!

PeterS

nwtk2007 wrote:

And yet, like Ted Cruz, we are told that they are ... (show quote)

That's what you get for believing a liar. You had your shot in over 60 courts of law including the Supreme Court so stop crying because none of them thought a case built on lies anything but a waste of time...

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

PeterS wrote:

That's what you get for believing a liar. You had your shot in over 60 courts of law including the Supreme Court so stop crying because none of them thought a case built on lies anything but a waste of time...

You've been touting this misrepresentation since the e******n. NO COURT CONSIDERED THE EVIDENCE!!!!!! The cases were dismissed due to technicalities. And Amy Barrett was reported to have said that they didn't want to overturn the results due to fear of r**ting.

You're as predictable as the tide, PeterS.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

RandyBrian wrote:

I absolutely agree! I have never said that the e******n was s****n, or that Biden, or anyone else, committed fraud. What I HAVE said is that a LOT of circumstantial evidence indicates that there was some fraud going on, almost all the indicators show Trump should have won, and I think, require?, demand?, INSIST that it be investigated by impartial objective representatives of our federal government. Until it is, a dark cloud of suspicion will hang over the 2020 e******n.

Along with any more to come because they did not do their duty..

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

PeterS wrote:

That's what you get for believing a liar. You had your shot in over 60 courts of law including the Supreme Court so stop crying because none of them thought a case built on lies anything but a waste of time...

How many times are you going to repeat that lie?? The courts DID NOT TRY THE EVIDENCE. Even the SCOTUS.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

nwtk2007 wrote:

How many times are you going to repeat that lie?? The courts DID NOT TRY THE EVIDENCE. Even the SCOTUS.

You are absolutely there nwtk2007, as I also posted.

I am going to try to not read any of the postings of the various OPP liberals; when you see sewer cover, you don't have to lift it to know what's underneath.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

woodguru wrote:

Dozens of courts did exactly that, courts gave the fraud pushers the chance to prove it and they failed.

As usual, not true.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

lindajoy wrote:

Along with any more to come because they did not do their duty..

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

crazylibertarian wrote:

You are absolutely there nwtk2007, as I also posted.

I am going to try to not read any of the postings of the various OPP liberals; when you see sewer cover, you don't have to lift it to know what's underneath.

True!!

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

crazylibertarian wrote:

You are absolutely there nwtk2007, as I also posted.

I am going to try to not read any of the postings of the various OPP liberals; when you see sewer cover, you don't have to lift it to know what's underneath.

The best metaphors are accurate as well as catchy. That is a GOOD one!

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

RandyBrian wrote:

The best metaphors are accurate as well as catchy. That is a GOOD one!

I can't claim originality though; I read it in a reference to the movie, The Last Temptation of Christ.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

crazylibertarian wrote:

I can't claim originality though; I read it in a reference to the movie, The Last Temptation of Christ.

LOL ! Yeah, that was another sewer lid I declined to open.