One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why the Rittenhouse Case Has Changed Everything
Page <<first <prev 4 of 39 next> last>>
Nov 16, 2021 10:01:09   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
TommyRadd wrote:
What a clever Freudian slip. It deserves another one…


Obliviously!


Yes, it is oblivious! I see no saving grace for the left, considering their r****t biases.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 10:01:26   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
quote=DASHY I also heard that r****rs were trying to control an active shooter who was doing so in defending himself against their attempts to neutralize him. I am personally against l**ting and destroying the property of innocent individuals. I never do that./quote

I see you missed a critical piece of data, so I took the liberty to correct it for you in red-text. You’re welcome, no “thank you” on your behalf necessary.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 10:03:17   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Yes, it is oblivious! I see no saving grace for the left, considering their r****t biases.


There’s no redeeming qualities for Marxism or anything akin to it. It is like a scourge that only lowers the standards of anything it influences.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2021 10:04:12   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
TommyRadd wrote:
There’s no redeeming qualities for Marxism or anything akin to it. It is like a scourge that only lowers the standards of anything it influences.


And, it brings death and decay.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 10:07:33   #
DASHY
 
TommyRadd wrote:
I’m all for an equitable investigation, and complete accountability for all who are PROVEN guilty in an actual court of law.

I’m not at all interested in another kangaroo-court witch hunt like the two propagated by the same individuals who swore up and down they had ample evidence of Trump’s Russian conclusion, when all they had was a dossier bought and paid for by Mrs Clinton and her ilk.


The congressional investigation of the J** 6 r**t is ongoing and getting some good results. Steve Bannon was recently indicted by a Grand Jury for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with a subpoena. We will soon see if he rats out his boss.https://www.forbes.com/sites/annakaplan/2021/11/12/steve-bannon-indicted-for-contempt-of-congress-after-refusing-to-comply-with-subpoena/?sh=d324cb27ec75

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 10:21:03   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
DASHY wrote:
The congressional investigation of the J** 6 r**t is ongoing and getting some good results. Steve Bannon was recently indicted by a Grand Jury for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with a subpoena. We will soon see if he rats out his boss.https://www.forbes.com/sites/annakaplan/2021/11/12/steve-bannon-indicted-for-contempt-of-congress-after-refusing-to-comply-with-subpoena/?sh=d324cb27ec75


Results? What results so far? The Bannon indictment is not a "result."

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 10:25:27   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
DASHY wrote:
The congressional investigation of the J** 6 r**t is ongoing and getting some good results. Steve Bannon was recently indicted by a Grand Jury for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with a subpoena. We will soon see if he rats out his boss.https://www.forbes.com/sites/annakaplan/2021/11/12/steve-bannon-indicted-for-contempt-of-congress-after-refusing-to-comply-with-subpoena/?sh=d324cb27ec75


Until there is an open acknowledgment of the double standards on the part of the left, I have extremely little confidence in them producing anything “equitable”. This called “sleeping in the bed you made”.

Some of these same politicians are on record inciting violence against their political adversaries by actually vocally supporting the r**ting and l**ting waged by l*****t antagonizers. Again, double standards.

And you defend them in the same way you are passively defending the r****rs and l**ters- by victimizing people who have been pushed to outrage, as if that wasn’t the intent of the left all along.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2021 10:34:31   #
DASHY
 
TommyRadd wrote:
quote=DASHY I also heard that r****rs were trying to control an active shooter who was doing so in defending himself against their attempts to neutralize him. I am personally against l**ting and destroying the property of innocent individuals. I never do that./quote

I see you missed a critical piece of data, so I took the liberty to correct it for you in red-text. You’re welcome, no “thank you” on your behalf necessary.


Here is another critical part of the data. Kyle's first victim was Mr. Rosenbaum who did not have a gun. Mr. Rosenbaum had a plastic bag which he threw at Kyle. Kyle shot the unarmed man and then he made a cellphone call and said "I just k**led somebody". Following that shooting, Mr. Huber spotted the armed man in the crowded street and attempted to protect his girlfriend and others from being harmed by an active shooter. Mr. Huber failed in his attempt when he was shot and k**led by Kyle Rittenhouse. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/us/kyle-rittenhouse-shooting-victims-trial/index.html

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 11:28:52   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
DASHY wrote:
When I shoot someone I am willing to accept the consequences.


Who’s arguing that point? If you have a weapon and it’s needed and you use it you are responsible for the consequences of your actions. Self defense is an affirmative defense under the law in case you have forgotten that.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 12:08:56   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
DASHY wrote:
Here is another critical part of the data. Kyle's first victim was Mr. Rosenbaum who did not have a gun. Mr. Rosenbaum had a plastic bag which he threw at Kyle. Kyle shot the unarmed man and then he made a cellphone call and said "I just k**led somebody". Following that shooting, Mr. Huber spotted the armed man in the crowded street and attempted to protect his girlfriend and others from being harmed by an active shooter. Mr. Huber failed in his attempt when he was shot and k**led by Kyle Rittenhouse. https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/us/kyle-rittenhouse-shooting-victims-trial/index.html
Here is another critical part of the data. Kyle's... (show quote)


Let’s hear the other side as well…

“On the night of the shooting, Rittenhouse said Joseph Rosenbaum threatened him two times prior to the shooting. As Rittenhouse explained, during the first encounter, Rosenbaum said he was going to k**l him while he was armed with a chain. During the second encounter, Rosenbaum said the N-word while saying he was going to rip Rittenhouse's heart out.
“Rittenhouse said he got a call from his friend to go to the car lot down the street because r****rs were setting fires and smashing cars. Rittenhouse asked for a fire extinguisher and someone at the gas station to go with him, but the individual didn't accompany him. Rittenhouse said he went to the lot but was ambushed by Rosenbaum, who came out from between two cars. 
“… Rittenhouse testified at first that he thought Rosenbaum threw the chain he had seen earlier because it looked silver in reflecting light. Rittenhouse said Rosenbaum kept running towards him and lunged when Rittenhouse turned and pointed his AR-15.
“Rittenhouse said he had to shoot Rosenbaum to defend himself because Rosenbaum was grabbing the AR-15 and he couldn't run any further away due to cars blocking his path. Rittenhouse explained that he then started to run toward police officers because he didn't do anything wrong and he felt it was no longer safe by the car lot since a crowd was yelling to "get him!" https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2021/11/10/kyle-rittenhouse-testimony-n2598879

Rosenbaum was out their r**ting and l**ting, Kyle was there hoping to help defend the lives and property of innocent victims.

Your double standards are still getting in the way of objectivity if you ask me.

I’ve said my piece. You’re not convinced by me neither am I by you. So be it.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 13:35:27   #
rdthom22
 
Kyle didn't instigate anything you need to do your research fools

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2021 13:35:36   #
rdthom22
 
Kyle didn't instigate anything you need to do your research fools

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 13:55:40   #
MajG
 
DASHY wrote:
During the r**t ruled by angry mobs who threatened innocent people and burned businesses, Rittenhouse was the only person who k**led someone. I hope the Rittenhouse decision does not tell other vigilante kids that it is OK to k**l people you disagree with.


FFFFFFOOOOLLLIN" I tell my kids it's perfectly alright to shoot someone who threatens your life in a physical way. Be sure to two tap. That's two shots, second one between the eyes. You don't want to deal with a wounded assailant.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 14:07:29   #
MajG
 
DASHY wrote:
Honesty and integrity MUST be the rock bottom of all social interaction. We all watched a pro-Trump mob attack our Capitol building and all our Government officials on J****** 6 in an attempt to o*******w their own government. Now the U.S. House Committee investigating the J****** 6 crimes MUST be encouraged to finish their work. Republican interference MUST stop.


Get it yet? Our government is so weak a group with f**gs, danger death twigs, and funny hats were trying to o*******w our government. This is the theory of girlie men, frightened children, and ignorant politicians. If this was an o*******w attempt it had to be the worst one in history. Anyone who served under arms would understand this. Do you really think the American or Russian revolution was stopped by a lurking coward cop murdering an unarmed veteran?
Are you a six year old?
Maybe when you start school you'll learn that the United States is the most powerful country in the world. A mob of ticked off patriots aren't going to take over with f**gs and twigs.

Reply
Nov 16, 2021 17:00:38   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Milosia2 wrote:
It’s my understanding one cannot claim self defense in a situation whereby was created by the defendant. If your mommy drops you off at a flaming full blown r**t, you immediately become a participant in the r**t.
This now prevents you from claiming self defense . And mommy knew too and should also be charged .

Psych evaluation before sentencing.


Mommy did not drop him off. I know it's a lot to ask but do try and get your facts straight every now and again.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 39 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.