Why the Rittenhouse Case Has Changed Everything (Page 3): What source did you use to copy all that social justice crap? I doubt that a 17-year old with gun in hand was thinking about...

DASHY

lindajoy wrote:

Dashy, do you agree Social justice is a political ... (show quote)

What source did you use to copy all that social justice crap? I doubt that a 17-year old with gun in hand was thinking about social justice debates when he grabbed a gun and joined the ongoing r**t. More likely, it was an opportunity for an adventure. He is learning an important lesson that actions have consequences.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

DASHY wrote:

The Congressional committee investigating the J****** 6 r**t is trying to connect the dots. We should encourage their efforts, not obstruct them.

No, they’re trying to spin the story to their advantage.

You’ve learned nothing.

Why did Pelosi turn down the help from the national guard that Trump offered?

Why were c*****l p****e opening doors for people to go in?

Why did none of them bring any actual weapons to an alleged planned i**********n?

Why is the committee so partisan?

Why are the videos of the event being suppressed?

Why was the only person actually k**led there an unarmed woman?

On and on the questions go.

But don’t worry, the “investigators” are all “on your side”, so what could go wrong, right?

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

DASHY wrote:

My thought is that if I volunteer to join an ongoing r**t with a gun in my hand, I expect to use it and I am willing to suffer the consequences of my actions.

As opposed to defending the innocent, victimized, attacked, homes and businesses burnt down and as a way to protect them and yourself???

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

DASHY wrote:

What source did you use to copy all that social justice crap? I doubt that a 17-year old with gun in hand was thinking about social justice debates when he grabbed a gun and joined the ongoing r**t. More likely, it was an opportunity for an adventure. He is learning an important lesson that actions have consequences.

You mean consequences like v****g in a demented old man with zero life’s accomplishments for president (except questionable dealings with foreign enemies for the sake of financial gain for him and his family), and a vp who slept her way into power? Those kind of consequences?

DASHY

lindajoy wrote:

As opposed to defending the innocent, victimized, attacked, homes and businesses burnt down and as a way to protect them and yourself???

When I shoot someone I am willing to accept the consequences.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

DASHY wrote:

What source did you use to copy all that social justice crap? I doubt that a 17-year old with gun in hand was thinking about social justice debates when he grabbed a gun and joined the ongoing r**t. More likely, it was an opportunity for an adventure. He is learning an important lesson that actions have consequences.

You are the one that brought up that now defined “Social justice crap”, was it not???

Yes, he is learning an important lesson…
What you surmise was a time for adventure another may view as an extremely unfortunate situation that by the allowing of all these r**ts we have been conditioned to just overlook many are not going to just “ cow-tail” to the Idiosyncrasies of a government gone wild that allows such. All just freedom of speech as so many defending the r**ts said, right???

DASHY

TommyRadd wrote:

You mean consequences like v****g in a demented old man with zero life’s accomplishments for president (except questionable dealings with foreign enemies for the sake of financial gain for him and his family), and a vp who slept her way into power? Those kind of consequences?

No, I mean consequences after I shoot someone.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

DASHY wrote:

No, I mean consequences after I shoot someone.

Apparently you haven’t yet heard or seen the court testimony of one of the surviving “victims” (Gaige Grosskreutz) that Kyle didn’t shoot him until he had his loaded weapon pointed at Kyle.

I don’t see where Kyle hasn’t admitted it. In fact he told the police that himself.

Perhaps you should ask about the “consequences” of r**ting, l**ting and destroying the property of innocent individuals… that those who do so are literally putting themselves in harms way.

Are you seeing the double standards yet? Am I piercing the void, here, Vern?

DASHY

TommyRadd wrote:

No, they’re trying to spin the story to their adva... (show quote)

These questions and more are currently being investigated. These efforts by our Congress should be supported by everyone. The investigators are on the side of all Americans who believe it is important to know the t***h about the attempt to o*******w our government. Maybe we can actually stop any future government takeover attempts.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lindajoy wrote:

As opposed to defending the innocent, victimized, attacked, homes and businesses burnt down and as a way to protect them and yourself???

Yes Linda, going in to help the victims of these stupid r**ts is "joining in on the r**t." Didn't you know??????

I h**e to say it but I hope the jury finds Rittenhouse not guilty, I hope they go r**ting again and this time, I hope the locals pull out their guns and defend their homes and business. If they are threatening violence then I say we practice Newton's third law;; for every action, there is an equal and opposite reactiion. It is time to take a stand to these devils.

I know, it's a bad thought, but enough is enough. We cannot allow this B*M/A****A/WOKE crap to over run us.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

TommyRadd wrote:

Apparently you haven’t yet heard or seen the court... (show quote)

Mope, it is impenetrable!

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

DASHY wrote:

These questions and more are currently being investigated. These efforts by our Congress should be supported by everyone. The investigators are on the side of all Americans who believe it is important to know the t***h about the attempt to o*******w our government. Maybe we can actually stop any future government takeover attempts.

I’m all for an equitable investigation, and complete accountability for all who are PROVEN guilty in an actual court of law.

I’m not at all interested in another kangaroo-court witch hunt like the two propagated by the same individuals who swore up and down they had ample evidence of Trump’s Russian conclusion, when all they had was a dossier bought and paid for by Mrs Clinton and her ilk.

DASHY

TommyRadd wrote:

Apparently you haven’t yet heard or seen the court... (show quote)

I also heard that r****rs were trying to control an active shooter. I am personally against l**ting and destroying the property of innocent individuals. I never do that.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

nwtk2007 wrote:

Mope, it is impenetrable!

What a clever Freudian slip. It deserves another one…

Obliviously!

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

DASHY wrote:

During the r**t ruled by angry mobs who threatened innocent people and burned businesses, Rittenhouse was the only person who k**led someone. I hope the Rittenhouse decision does not tell other vigilante kids that it is OK to k**l people you disagree with.

Yes, it’s much better to tell angry mobs hell bent on destruction to do as you wish without consequence.

Please learn the definition of words before you use them and please read and think about what you’re saying before clicking Send. Vigilante? K**l people you disagree with?

Rittenhouse is not a vigilante. He did not take the law into his own hands.

Regarding those who were k**led or injured during his acts of self defense; play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

That is the lesson to be learned.