This data, which has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a C****-** v*****e have a 70.1% higher chance of being hospitalised with the alleged Delta C***d variant than people who are unv******ted.

As per the above table we can see that of the 53,822 confirmed cases of the Delta C***d variant in people who are unv******ted, 44 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.07% of confirmed cases in the people who are unv******ted.

However, of the 7,235 confirmed cases of the Delta C***d variant in people who had received both doses of a C****-** v*****e and were therefore fully v******ted, 50 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.69% of confirmed cases in people who are fully v******ted.

This data, which again has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a C****-** v*****e have a 885.7% higher chance of dying due to the Delta C***d variant than people who are unv******ted.

Now that definitely isn’t what the C****-** v*****es said they would do on the tin.

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/07/07/fully-v******ted-people-have-a-885-higher-chance-of-death-due-to-c****-**-than-people-who-are-unv******ted-according-to-official-data/

Any "Buyers Remorse" yet?

This topic really is too stupid to address. We are expected to have 200K deaths due to c***d by the end of the year and even more come the following year. I mention that only because it is an e******n year and the vast majority of those who are dying are conservative anti-v**xers who are too stupid to be alive on this planet. Well, C***d is taking care of that for them. So don't get shots and I am sincerely begging you not to. Keep believing every ignorant thing that you are told and let's see if we can't get those C***d deaths to rise even faster okay!

I h**e to say it, but those numbers are bull schitte. I don't mean the actual case numbers. I mean the percentages as you have presented them that give a number of 885% greater chance of death with the v*****es. You are simply not comparing the correct totals and giving a false impression. Like getting numbers from the Government or a democrat. The important facts are that there are less cases reported of getting C***d with the v*****es and part of that is because there are less case days of that condition existing, But they are dying at a higher rate with the v*****e. And the survivability rate is still over 99% in either case.

I haven't taken the v*****e and would like to believe that 885% rate, but it simply isn't so. Meanwhile, there is still no great proof either way for either case. Yet.

Mathematically and
Logically Right