Gatsby

This data, which has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a C****-** v*****e have a 70.1% higher chance of being hospitalised with the alleged Delta C***d variant than people who are unv******ted.

As per the above table we can see that of the 53,822 confirmed cases of the Delta C***d variant in people who are unv******ted, 44 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.07% of confirmed cases in the people who are unv******ted.

However, of the 7,235 confirmed cases of the Delta C***d variant in people who had received both doses of a C****-** v*****e and were therefore fully v******ted, 50 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.69% of confirmed cases in people who are fully v******ted.

This data, which again has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a C****-** v*****e have a 885.7% higher chance of dying due to the Delta C***d variant than people who are unv******ted.

Now that definitely isn’t what the C****-** v*****es said they would do on the tin.

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/07/07/fully-v******ted-people-have-a-885-higher-chance-of-death-due-to-c****-**-than-people-who-are-unv******ted-according-to-official-data/

Any "Buyers Remorse" yet?

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

To many knuckle heads here for this to sink in. Easier to stick their heads in the sand or up their butts.

Michael10

Yea, So that's why 85% of people dying from the v***s are unv******ted....

Gatsby

Agreed. I posted the info for those who remain uncommitted, not for those who should be committed.

Gatsby

Your unsupported numbers are not only out of date, they are not Delta specific,

and therefore not relevant to the topic.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

Micheal10 Is not relevant

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

I h**e to say it, but those numbers are bull schitte. I don't mean the actual case numbers. I mean the percentages as you have presented them that give a number of 885% greater chance of death with the v*****es. You are simply not comparing the correct totals and giving a false impression. Like getting numbers from the Government or a democrat. The important facts are that there are less cases reported of getting C***d with the v*****es and part of that is because there are less case days of that condition existing, But they are dying at a higher rate with the v*****e. And the survivability rate is still over 99% in either case.

I haven't taken the v*****e and would like to believe that 885% rate, but it simply isn't so. Meanwhile, there is still no great proof either way for either case. Yet.

Mathematically and
Logically Right

Gatsby

BINGO

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

I liked the way you ended your comment, "mathematically & logically right".

Gatsby

The numbers are matter of fact.. The math is correct. The fully v******ted do appear to be less likely to contract

C***d Delta, but the outcomes, for those who do contract Delta, are clear.

To live, or die, in denial is certainly your right, however, you have been warned.

To each, his own.

PeterS

If this goober were still alive he might have some buyer's remorse. But hey, one less conservative v**er for the midterms...

PeterS

This topic really is too stupid to address. We are expected to have 200K deaths due to c***d by the end of the year and even more come the following year. I mention that only because it is an e******n year and the vast majority of those who are dying are conservative anti-v**xers who are too stupid to be alive on this planet. Well, C***d is taking care of that for them. So don't get shots and I am sincerely begging you not to. Keep believing every ignorant thing that you are told and let's see if we can't get those C***d deaths to rise even faster okay!

Rose42

Why is it you people who have claimed you care about others wish others to die? Sick

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

Petey bird is a sick, vile, d********g anti-American.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Chinese propaganda.