You are assuming, incorrectly, that is the ONLY reason the 2A was created. Here are some thoughts from the 'creators' of the 2A:

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful s***ery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison

"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria)

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of s***es."
- William Pitt (the Younger)

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention,

It kind of turns my stomach to agree with you, but I do agree that the gun owner should be found and investigated. There is NO excuse for a firearm to be in the hands of a child, and whoever is responsible should be held accountable.
Having said that, Rinaldi is a first class ass for trying to make an issue of the "happening in a church" when it did not. Two boys (illegally? driving? stealing?) a vehicle into a church's parking lot with a stolen weapon can be considered evolution in action.

By the way, just for the record. NO firearm, in the history of America, when properly designed and constructed, legally purchased, legally used, and properly and safely maintained by the legitimate owner, has ever harmed anyone. Not once.

It kind of turns my stomach to agree with you, but I do agree that the gun owner should be found and investigated. There is NO excuse for a firearm to be in the hands of a child, and whoever is responsible should be held accountable.
Having said that, Rinaldi is a first class ass for trying to make an issue of the "happening in a church" when it did not. Two boys (illegally? driving? stealing?) a vehicle into a church's parking lot with a stolen weapon can be considered evolution in action.

By the way, just for the record. NO firearm, in the history of America, when properly designed and constructed, legally purchased, legally used, and properly and safely maintained by the legitimate owner, has ever harmed anyone. Not once.

I'm not talking about changing the second amendment, you conservatives have already done that...and I doubt very much if you would agree to the type of licensing that goes into cars and apply it to guns because just as there are those that are denied a drivers license deny one single conservative the right to own their precious gun and the whole world will come tumbling down.

This isn't an argument, the second amendment was created to provide a m*****a to protect the country in place of a free-standing army. There isn't a conservative out there though who cares about that...you want the largest military you could possibly have and you want a "m*****a" too only you DON'T want to be "Well" regulated by the government.

And hey, if you want to build an argument to do away with cars go right ahead but as horrific crashes, as we might have today they are nothing compared to what we had just 30 years ago. Why you ask???
Regulations...mountains, and mountains of them, and there will be even more as we go along. People like their cars but they also like to be safe in them. If you got T-boned in the 1960's you likely would be dead. If you got T-boned in 2021 you would stand a good chance of surviving all because today's cars are over-engineered for safety wherewith you conservatives we have bump stocks and every effort to circumvent, get around, and disobey all efforts at regulating gun safety. Give a pimply-faced teenager an AR-15 and applaud when he commits murder. Do you think that's what the founders had in mind? Not by a long shot but it fits the narrative that you conservatives want it to so wh**ever the founders intended...well, they can go FK themselves because they sure as hell ain't going to take away our guns...are they.