RandyBrian wrote:
Good! I hope you enjoyed reading it as much as I did writing it!
Cuda, you are entitled to believe wh**ever you want. Self deception seems to be a prerequisite for being a progressive, so I encourage you to saturate yourself with it.
But for your health's sake, just don't take it all so personally when the rest of us continue in our fact based beliefs.
Yes, indeed, slight correction, in your delusional alternative fact based belief. Self deception is your party's sign, and I see why you do it, because of the stress of accepting the t***h may create an unhealthy event. Keep up the good work at your self preservation and survival.
Cuda2020 wrote:
Yes, indeed, slight correction, in your delusional alternative fact based belief. Self deception is your party's sign, and I see why you do it, because of the stress of accepting the t***h may create an unhealthy event. Keep up the good work at your self preservation and survival.
The second sign of a modern progressive is compulsive projection.
But keep 'em coming! I'm enjoying the laughs!
Cuda2020 wrote:
Yes, indeed, slight correction, in your delusional alternative fact based belief. Self deception is your party's sign, and I see why you do it, because of the stress of accepting the t***h may create an unhealthy event. Keep up the good work at your self preservation and survival.
The problem with making assumptions is that you believe they are the t***h. Lies can be found and corrected.
"There are no right or wrong answers when it comes to opinions. Some are just more logical and reasonable than others" Alistair Abram-Akrofti-Mantey
RandyBrian wrote:
The second sign of a modern progressive is compulsive projection.
But keep 'em coming! I'm enjoying the laughs!
Yes it's a damn shame we can back up what we say with facts, versus the rights simple insults in rebuttal along with a right leaning opinion piece.
Justice101 wrote:
The problem with making assumptions is that you believe they are the t***h. Lies can be found and corrected.
"There are no right or wrong answers when it comes to opinions. Some are just more logical and reasonable than others" Alistair Abram-Akrofti-Mantey
Sorry wrong, right and wrong answers do exist, just as facts do, the problem today is people twisting the facts to a subjective alternative t***h in order to fit their own narrative.
Today the facts are hidden so they can become ambiguous alternative t***hs. Take the impeachments, take the recent autopsy of Sicknick.
Cuda2020 wrote:
Sorry wrong, right and wrong answers do exist, just as facts do, the problem today is people twisting the facts to a subjective alternative t***h in order to fit their own narrative.
Today the facts are hidden so they can become ambiguous alternative t***hs. Take the impeachments, take the recent autopsy of Sicknick.
So what difference does it make, Cuda? I provide a FACT that the medical examiner says that Officer Sicknick died of natural causes. YOU say NO WAY! Too convenient. YOU are deciding that a fact produced by a government medical expert is a lie, when he can be prosecuted, lose his license, and sent to the pen over it.
So WHO is living in an alternate fantasy world, hmmmm?
YOU provide a opinion, calling it a fact, and get antagonistic and angry because I don't take it seriously, so you now claim I are ignoring t***h, and living in a fantasy world.
Apply your own standards to yourself.
Cuda2020 wrote:
Yes it's a damn shame we can back up what we say with facts, versus the rights simple insults in rebuttal along with a right leaning opinion piece.
What are you talking about? I sent you a post previously from Snopes, taken from an Associated Press article talking about Brian Sicknick's death. Everyone here would say that AP is a LEFT-LEANING NEWS SOURCE buddy.
Your confirmation bias is showing.
RandyBrian wrote:
So what difference does it make, Cuda? I provide a FACT that the medical examiner says that Officer Sicknick died of natural causes. YOU say NO WAY! Too convenient. YOU are deciding that a fact produced by a government medical expert is a lie, when he can be prosecuted, lose his license, and sent to the pen over it.
So WHO is living in an alternate fantasy world, hmmmm?
YOU provide a opinion, calling it a fact, and get antagonistic and angry because I don't take it seriously, so you now claim I are ignoring t***h, and living in a fantasy world.
Apply your own standards to yourself.
So what difference does it make, Cuda? I provide ... (
show quote)
When someone consistently lies to themselves, they have no standards.
It's postmodern philosophy on steroids at work.
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
Fact of the matter was Pelosi is the i**********nist. She planned all the mayhem last J** 6th. Her purpose was to justify her impeachment against president Trump.
This Republican lie just wonβt die, and it becomes more ridiculous every time you post it.
Quote:
the 2 most knowledgeable/smartest members of the GOP party Jim Jordan and Jim Banks
πππππππ
kemmer wrote:
πππππππ
Seems funny they don't want to investigate and catch Nancy in her ploy, lol
Yea. Curious, isn't it, that the lightening bolt just randomly happened to zero in on and destroy that mural of Floyd's likeness? Or could it just possibly have been the hand of the Lord? I'll go with the Lord showing His distain for those i***ts who worship such lost souls as false idols.
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Seems funny they don't want to investigate and catch Nancy in her ploy, lol
McCarthy wants no part of any investigation because Trump told him he doesnβt. Besides Jim Jordan, Iβm surprised Kevin didnβt try to put Louie βThe Lonestar Loonβ Gohmert on the J****** 6th Commission.
RandyBrian wrote:
So what difference does it make, Cuda? I provide a FACT that the medical examiner says that Officer Sicknick died of natural causes. YOU say NO WAY! Too convenient. YOU are deciding that a fact produced by a government medical expert is a lie, when he can be prosecuted, lose his license, and sent to the pen over it.
So WHO is living in an alternate fantasy world, hmmmm?
YOU provide a opinion, calling it a fact, and get antagonistic and angry because I don't take it seriously, so you now claim I are ignoring t***h, and living in a fantasy world.
Apply your own standards to yourself.
So what difference does it make, Cuda? I provide ... (
show quote)
That's right and these are my inalienable rights in action. Anything under the old Trump administration holds no trust, they've proven that to us time and time again, trust is not given it's earned. His death, is how they are choosing to call it, and it is still under investigation, so right now it may be a FACT he died of a stroke, but what CAUSED the stroke is the point here and under investigation.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.