The "i**********n in J** 6" (Page 9): Am I bias against Trump and his administration, you bet your sweet arse I am, anyone with a thinking, reasonably moral mind would be. For...

Cuda2020

Justice101 wrote:

What are you talking about? I sent you a post previously from Snopes, taken from an Associated Press article talking about Brian Sicknick's death. Everyone here would say that AP is a LEFT-LEANING NEWS SOURCE buddy.

Your confirmation bias is showing.

Am I bias against Trump and his administration, you bet your sweet arse I am, anyone with a thinking, reasonably moral mind would be. For you...Fool me ounce shame on you, fool me thousands of times shame on me.

American Vet

Cuda2020 wrote:

That's right and these are my inalienable rights in action. Anything under the old Trump administration holds no trust, they've proven that to us time and time again, trust is not given it's earned. His death, is how they are choosing to call it, and it is still under investigation, so right now it may be a FACT he died of a stroke, but what CAUSED the stroke is the point here and under investigation.

And the medical examiner ruled it as 'natural causes'. So you don't trust him? Why not?

Again an example of how you refuse to face facts - common amongst progressive/l*****ts......

American Vet

Cuda2020 wrote:

Am I bias against Trump and his administration, you bet your sweet arse I am,

Then you have no business making comments if you cannot be fair - as you just admitted you can't.

Justice101

Cuda2020 wrote:

That's right and these are my inalienable rights in action. Anything under the old Trump administration holds no trust, they've proven that to us time and time again, trust is not given it's earned. His death, is how they are choosing to call it, and it is still under investigation, so right now it may be a FACT he died of a stroke, but what CAUSED the stroke is the point here and under investigation.

It is certainly your right to investigate what you believe is something that caused the unfortunate stroke of the officer which ultimately led to his death. Have you ever heard of underlying medical conditions that are known or unknown to people? His medical records are off-limits to you under HIPAA, so why don't you except the autopsy results as they stand?

You, the Democrats and the Government are too invasive in the privacy rights of the American people.

federally indicted mattoid

Justice101 wrote:

It is certainly your right to investigate what you believe is something that caused the unfortunate stroke of the officer which ultimately led to his death. Have you ever heard of underlying medical conditions that are known or unknown to people? His medical records are off-limits to you under HIPAA, so why don't you except the autopsy results as they stand?

You, the Democrats and the Government are too invasive in the privacy rights of the American people.

Maybe after you huff a few doses of bear spray and don't have a stroke, we'll start believing your version of reality.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Maybe after you huff a few doses of bear spray and don't have a stroke, we'll start believing your version of reality.

Amazing. And you people like to accuse the right wingers of falling for conspiracy theories.
I've yet to see you guys EVER admit that you were wrong, no matter what twisted plot you have to conjure up to make your round narrative fit in the square of reality.

Justice101

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Maybe after you huff a few doses of bear spray and don't have a stroke, we'll start believing your version of reality.

Cuda2020

American Vet wrote:

And the medical examiner ruled it as 'natural causes'. So you don't trust him? Why not?

Again an example of how you refuse to face facts - common amongst progressive/l*****ts......

I accept facts all the time, but not when it come to ANYTHING that can be connected to Trump! After all the heat he took on the i**********n, the last thing he needed was the death on his hands of a police officer and good man. In my mind that mans death is on his hands and on all the hands that were involved in the attack.

Cuda2020

Justice101 wrote:

It is certainly your right to investigate what you believe is something that caused the unfortunate stroke of the officer which ultimately led to his death. Have you ever heard of underlying medical conditions that are known or unknown to people? His medical records are off-limits to you under HIPAA, so why don't you except the autopsy results as they stand?

You, the Democrats and the Government are too invasive in the privacy rights of the American people.

That's laughable, seriously, that coming from a new Trump republican. While Trump was in office, which he still was, he was and could be connected to any Federal government office, including to trickle down to the medical examiner, especially to save his own arse. Anyone medical person would have to consider getting smashed in the head a possible precursor to a stroke. Go and read up about it like I did, then come talk to me.

Cuda2020

RandyBrian wrote:

Amazing. And you people like to accuse the right wingers of falling for conspiracy theories.
I've yet to see you guys EVER admit that you were wrong, no matter what twisted plot you have to conjure up to make your round narrative fit in the square of reality.

Great, show me where you guys have, especially when it comes to your führer.

kemmer

RandyBrian wrote:

And you people like to accuse the right wingers of falling for conspiracy theories.

Ever since Trump's defeat, the right has been just slopping over with all kinds of conspiracy theories, trying to explain why Trump lost.

Cuda2020

American Vet wrote:

Then you have no business making comments if you cannot be fair - as you just admitted you can't.

It's still America buddy, I can make all the opinionated remarks I want, just as you do, or don't you realize that?

Cuda2020

kemmer wrote:

Ever since Trump's defeat, the right has been just slopping over with all kinds of conspiracy theories, trying to explain why Trump lost.

It's getting old, we should stop indulging them and get to some real issues, maybe some even Biden should be focusing on, like reconstructing the tax base and tax loopholes. The wealthy are still enjoying their extra revenue and why they can afford their own rockets while our infrastructure is critically in need. Is anyone seeing the irony here, then they want us to hail to them and throw rose pedals in their path, sorry I'm not likely part of that crowd.

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

It's getting old, we should stop indulging them and get to some real issues, maybe some even Biden should be focusing on, like reconstructing the tax base and tax loopholes. The wealthy are still enjoying their extra revenue and why they can afford their own rockets while our infrastructure is critically in need. Is anyone seeing the irony here, then they want us to hail to them and throw rose pedals in their path, sorry I'm not likely part of that crowd.

=====================
Here are the different taxes that wealthy people pay.
Personal income tax.
State income tax.
State sales tax.
Corporate income tax.
Property tax.
Business and Licenses tax.
Excise tax.
Employees SS and Medicare tax, 7.65% of the total employees gross salaries every payday.
Unemployment tax
Estate tax.
Capital gains tax.

The richest pay 40% of all taxes combined.

This is the most honest compilation of the Heritage Foundation

kemmer

Radiance3 wrote:

=====================
Here are the different taxes that wealthy people pay.
Personal income tax.
Corporate income tax.
Property tax.
Business and Licenses tax.
Excise tax.
Employees SS and Medicare tax, 7.65% of the total employees gross salaries every payday.
Unemployment tax
Estate tax.
Capital gains tax.

The richest pay 40% of all taxes combined.

What’s blatantly missing here is the fact the poorest pay a much higher percentage of their income in taxes than the wealthy and corporations do.