Thanks, President Biden...
Jul 21, 2021 16:11:38 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
nwtk2007 wrote:
Flawed and yet successful. Now we have another f... (show quote)
Successful, huh
Take your pick from the following...(There are some you'll appreciate
)https://www.bing.com/search?q=thefailingsofthetrumppresidency&cvid=ce569e2cd5f44cbc81805a7a9f858bf5&aqs=edge..69i57.8479j0j4&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS
It's just as likely you might never admit to being wrong with your choice of Trump. C'est la vie.
Jul 21, 2021 16:16:03 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
Successful, huh img src="https://static.onepoliti... (show quote)
Just a bunch of opinions.
Look at the border. In your opinion, is it now better?
Look at Cuba, in you opinion, is it hypocrisy to refuse them asylum?
In your opinion, will 5 trillion in spending stop inflation?
I could go on and on.
Jul 21, 2021 18:05:27 #
Jul 21, 2021 19:12:12 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-221566-1.html
I am not talking to Hopkins. Answer the questions if you dare. In fact, I do dare you.
There is no justification for subbing in Biden to literally harm the country.
Jul 21, 2021 19:16:25 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
Successful, huh img src="https://static.onepoliti... (show quote)
Slat, I can provide the same sort of thing regarding Trumps accomplishments. Here: http://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/25-top-accomplishments-of-president-donald-j-trump/
And look as some of the comments, if you will, AND the responses.
Jul 22, 2021 11:24:08 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
nwtk2007 wrote:
Slat, I can provide the same sort of thing regarding Trumps accomplishments. Here: http://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/25-top-accomplishments-of-president-donald-j-trump/
And look as some of the comments, if you will, AND the responses.
And look as some of the comments, if you will, AND the responses.
No surprise there, as links are available for just about any take on today's political atmosphere. BTW, I almost always read the comments/responses.
Jul 22, 2021 11:43:49 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
No surprise there, as links are available for just about any take on today's political atmosphere. BTW, I almost always read the comments/responses.
I thought this source was a bit tones down. Do you disagree with her talking points?
Jul 23, 2021 08:38:13 #
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Because their c***ting was not yet quite up to current standards of c***ting. They took care of that last November. I guess in 2000 they hadn't yet thought of D******n.
They're c***ting? You realize we're talking about the republicans c***ting Al Gore. LOL
Jul 23, 2021 08:44:10 #
slatten49 wrote:
From the Reuter's link in a previous post of mine...
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
...instead of alleging “widespread fraud or e******n-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
...instead of alleging “widespread fraud or e******n-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”
Jul 23, 2021 09:32:46 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
No surprise there, as links are available for just about any take on today's political atmosphere. BTW, I almost always read the comments/responses.
Do you disagree with her talking points?
Crickets.
Jul 23, 2021 13:02:59 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
nwtk2007 wrote:
Do you disagree with her talking points?
Crickets.
Crickets.
Recognizing them as talking points, they merited little recognition.
BTW/FYI, I don't spend the time I used to on OPP...catching it now & then. I respond accordingly when I can.
Jul 23, 2021 13:24:29 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
Recognizing them as talking points, they merited little recognition.
BTW/FYI, I don't spend the time I used to on OPP...catching it now & then. I respond accordingly when I can.
BTW/FYI, I don't spend the time I used to on OPP...catching it now & then. I respond accordingly when I can.
Same here, I just happen to have some extra time this morning. I look at it also between patients.
So, you think the talking points cited as accomplishments don't rate "accomplishment?"
Jul 23, 2021 15:15:21 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
nwtk2007 wrote:
Same here, I just happen to have some extra time this morning. I look at it also between patients.
So, you think the talking points cited as accomplishments don't rate "accomplishment?"
So, you think the talking points cited as accomplishments don't rate "accomplishment?"
Probably about as much as you recognized previously listed Biden's accomplishments and Trump's failures.
Sort'a/kind'a like "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".Jul 23, 2021 16:22:30 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
slatten49 wrote:
Probably about as much as you recognized previously listed Biden's accomplishments and Trump's failures.
Sort'a/kind'a like "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
Sort'a/kind'a like "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".I think I missed that somehow. I was working and prolly got side tracked, cam back to it, and fired back without thinking.
My bad on that one.
Jul 23, 2021 16:33:18 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
nwtk2007 wrote:
I think I missed that somehow. I was working and prolly got side tracked, cam back to it, and fired back without thinking.
My bad on that one.
My bad on that one.
That can and has happened to about all of us.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.