WhatIt'sWorth wrote:
"hospitals, schools, churches, 1,000's of charities"
Yes, this called to mind all the multitudes of
Muslim Soup Kitchens, Food Banks, charity hospitals various Islamic charities and such
which Americans literally STUMBLE OVER in every city, and of course which fill the world with the humanitarian efforts of "the Peaceful religion of Islam"
but why is Rumitoid being hoisted on a petard for pointing out t***hs that the Bible contains contradictions?
What is wrong with EXPERIENCE?
I do not come from a tradition of "Sola Scriptura" or "Inerrancy" --
these are RELATIVELY NEW CONCEPTS in the history of Christianity -- man-made stuff of relatively recent origin comapared to 2000 years of Christian history
rather than worshipping a BOOK -- or a COLLECTION OF BOOKS
(whose scope is not even today agreed upon by main branches of Christianity such as Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodox and Coptic...)
you have alluded to it yerself, Army -- it is a "present in the world Holy Spirit" - and a risen Christ which is the object of our worship --
NOT a "book" who some people claim "inerrancy" concerning - (yet do not seem to know the contents of as well as heretics like myself)
who freely admit "it contains contradictions/discrepancies/inconsistencies - but such things do not undermine Faith in the last analysis
"Scripture - Reason - Experience - Tradition"
this is the 'real deal' rather than "sola scriptura" and a view of the bible which is like a tree standing stiff in a strong wind that will break to it rather than bend in the wind as nature has for LIVING trees...
The "Wesleyan Quadrilateral" of being guided by Scripture-Reason-Experience-Tradition, is, granted - just a DESCRIPTION - albeit a pretty good one
It is not something "declared" by John Wesley himself -- it was in fact coined by a fairly recent theologian, Albert Outler in the 60's; - who reflected on what Wesley thought on things and summarized this 4-way guide
The four "Legs" of the so-called "Wesleyan Quadrilateral" all support each other and mutually reinforce each other.
Do you think your theological views are free from TRADITION?
Bah - I submit that your TRADITION establishes the scope of your SCRIPTURE
(I e, - if you were Catholic or Greek Orthodox, your Bible would be bigger -- if you were jewish like ginnyt yer "bible" would be smaller)
-- that your REASON is involved in even the very process of comprehending "Scripture" - that your EXPERIENCE is a valid human part of your response/comprehension of/to God
Scripture/Reason/Experience/Tradition
Know it.
Live it.
Or else just continue to demonize those such as Rumitoid and myself who admit the Bible contains errors -- yet believe in the broad picture of a Risen Lord and a guiding Holy Spirit --
these things make it come down to a choice between
a DEAD BOOK or a LIVING GOD
ya pays ya money, and ya takes ya choice
"hospitals, schools, churches, 1,000's of cha... (
show quote)
Your concept of not worshiping the book is a valid one. I just happen to believe that the main source of t***h are the scriptures and nature.
The days of new revelation have ceased unless one is to believe some of the T.V. s**mmers that rip folks off by their focusing on a few cherry picked verses about healing and money.
What is between Rumi and myself should stay between him and myself. I do apologize to him and everyone else who may have read my remarks to him. Not because of the remarks but because I usually do not debate spiritual matters on an open forum but rather keep the conservation in PM's. I really do not think it is good for Christians to debate in front of Atheists or non-believers or even those who are new to the faith.
I have a problem with understanding you calling yourself a heretic and yet claiming such high knowledge of scripture and the history of Wesley.
I have no qualms about people disagreeing with the Bible and I really have many questions that I have not come to grips with. Questions yes, doubts no.
What would the world be if the Word of God had been left to word of moth, tradition, experience? There would be more doubt than there is now with the written word.
Are you a student of Process Theology? If so, I understand the stand you are thinking. I would suggest a book by AW Tozer entitled, "The Knowledge of the Holy." He speaks of the many attributes of God.
One whose base attributes are Omnipotence, Omniscience, and Omnipresence need not worry what His created beings says or thinks about the accuracy of His Word.
I believe it was the Atheists Voltaire who made the remark that within 100 years the Bible and Christianity would be a dead and forgotten issue. That is not an exact quote, but close.
The fact is, there is now a Christian book store that is part of his old home.
I h**e confrontation, I really do, I h**e rude behavior in anyone. So I am not trying to be disagreeable just to disagree.
However, many have fallen from great heights by claiming to be serious but have been found to be sincerely wrong. If you ever listen to Jim Baker, Richard Dortch, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Jones and others; these were people who said they were led by the Spirit and in each and every case there has been many many people misled and have lost great amounts of money and had their faith destroyed by following the so-called self experience with God.
I suppose I am not communicating on your much higher level of intelligence than I but I do stand by the Bible the way it is and will take it as a guide to my salvation, my beliefs, faith, and eternal destiny. Please try to understand, I hear what you and Rumi are saying, but it doesn't make a jot or tittle's difference in my belief in Gods Word.