Believer of The Big Lie wakes up, recants
Jun 8, 2021 14:22:45 #
nonalien1 wrote:
People will say anything to get out of doing time.
But the t***h is the very best defense...that said ignorance and stupidity is not a defense.
Jun 8, 2021 14:26:36 #
BigMike wrote:
What happens if the AZ audit finds irregularities? How long will it be a lie if audits spread and they find irregularities? What if they find more than that?
Just for giggles.
Just for giggles.
What happens when the DOJ shuts it down because of e******n security violations? Are the Cyber Ninjas, who have no experience at b****t counts or audits supposed to handle secure b****ts however they want, and do "counts" that have no corroboration and procedures they follow?
The DOJ served formal warning that they were violating e******n laws, which they have ignored, they do not get a free pass and the next step is prosecution and shutting their clown show down.
Jun 8, 2021 14:30:01 #
Weasel wrote:
So you believe that $30Million in damage was done to the Capitol Also.
Hmmmmmmm......
Hmmmmmmm......
Who cares if it was a dime? The amount of damage has no bearing on what they did. They broke the law, they attacked police, they were a threat to law makers doing their jobs. By definition it was an i**********n attempt, not a tourist visit as morons have claimed.
Jun 8, 2021 14:30:59 #
woodguru wrote:
What happens when the DOJ shuts it down because of e******n security violations? Are the Cyber Ninjas, who have no experience at b****t counts or audits supposed to handle secure b****ts however they want, and do "counts" that have no corroboration and procedures they follow?
The DOJ served formal warning that they were violating e******n laws, which they have ignored, they do not get a free pass and the next step is prosecution and shutting their clown show down.
The DOJ served formal warning that they were violating e******n laws, which they have ignored, they do not get a free pass and the next step is prosecution and shutting their clown show down.
The DOJ has no frelling jurisdiction. Have a nice day!
Jun 8, 2021 14:31:51 #
woodguru wrote:
Who cares if it was a dime? The amount of damage has no bearing on what they did. They broke the law, they attacked police, they were a threat to law makers doing their jobs. By definition it was an i**********n attempt, not a tourist visit as morons have claimed.
Who's "they"? There were several groups involved?
Jun 8, 2021 14:32:35 #
woodguru wrote:
But the t***h is the very best defense...that said ignorance and stupidity is not a defense.
Until your a$$ is the one gaffled up. You speak from utter ignorance.
Jun 8, 2021 14:40:19 #
BigMike wrote:
Wh**ever happened on the 6th it wasn't us or we'd have overrun the whole enchilada. There was quite a gang of us in Washington that day. 
You know the main thing that played hell with plans? It was the FBI visiting leaders of the militant groups being told you will not be going to see trump's speech. Any number of the leaders that were not there to coordinate and give instructions could have made a huge difference.
Your "gang" was an unorganized circle jerk with uncoordinated factions. Elements that were on standby did not get employed...such as the "heavy" weapons stashes ready to be deployed.
Your president is an ineffective leader, he pussed out when it came time to make calls to arms to your "gang" that was ready and probably prepared to answer that call. According to plan, trump was supposed to declare marshal law and leave m*****a groups standing as his "helpers".
Try reconciling what was supposed to happen and how the president did some of his part, such as declining to call in backup support against i**********nists, but it was a fail.
Part of the fail was that there were no A****a or B*M counter protesters against which the i**********n could be ratcheted up.
Jun 8, 2021 14:47:54 #
BigMike wrote:
Who's "they"? There were several groups involved?
Which is why I called it a circle jerk. There is evidence of a certain degree of coordination, such as the tours given the day before by republicans.
"They" is every t*****rous i**********nist trying to disrupt democracy that was there, peaceful or not.
Jun 8, 2021 16:08:19 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
BigMike wrote:
What if they c***ted like Biden said they did?
He did say that, Slatt. I'm sure you heard it.
He did say that, Slatt. I'm sure you heard it.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-v**er-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH\\
Excerpt of final paragraph...
"VERDICT: Missing context. This clip of Biden allegedly “admitting” to v***r f***d has been shared out of context. As seen in the full interview, the former vice president was discussing his campaign’s v**er protection program".
Also: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
Jun 8, 2021 16:18:00 #
BigMike wrote:
What if they c***ted like Biden said they did?
He did say that, Slatt. I'm sure you heard it.
He did say that, Slatt. I'm sure you heard it.
Are you capable of reading the full story and seeing that the statement was taken out of context?
I grew up in a better world where people were smart enough to figure out when they were being played for a fool, and figuring that out not only pissed them off when they figured it out, but made them wiser.
The days when americans were smarter and less gullible would sure be nice.
Jun 8, 2021 16:27:52 #
woodguru wrote:
You know the main thing that played hell with plans? It was the FBI visiting leaders of the militant groups being told you will not be going to see trump's speech. Any number of the leaders that were not there to coordinate and give instructions could have made a huge difference.
Right.
Quote:
Your "gang" was an unorganized circle jerk with uncoordinated factions. Elements that were on standby did not get employed...such as the "heavy" weapons stashes ready to be deployed.
Really?
Quote:
Your president is an ineffective leader, he pussed out when it came time to make calls to arms to your "gang" that was ready and probably prepared to answer that call. According to plan, trump was supposed to declare marshal law and leave m*****a groups standing as his "helpers".
Indeed?
Quote:
Try reconciling what was supposed to happen and how the president did some of his part, such as declining to call in backup support against i**********nists, but it was a fail.
Wow.
Quote:
Part of the fail was that there were no A****a or B*M counter protesters against which the i**********n could be ratcheted up.
Do tell.
Sooner or later you'll run out of propaganda. It's very shiny but it doesn't hold out over t***h...which is why Mewler failed...which is why impeachments 1 & 2 failed...which is why the corrupt and last ditch SDNY has failed and will fail.
It's why D******n won't press their own lawsuits. It's why when the Russian company(s) showed up for discovery after being indicted by f**e-a$$ Mewler, HE DIDN'T! It was BS from the start. It was ALL to find something to GET Trump on
Wait until it becomes LAW that all politicians, their families and foundations get audited every two years because of this.
Jun 8, 2021 16:28:39 #
woodguru wrote:
Are you capable of reading the full story and seeing that the statement was taken out of context?
I grew up in a better world where people were smart enough to figure out when they were being played for a fool, and figuring that out not only pissed them off when they figured it out, but made them wiser.
The days when americans were smarter and less gullible would sure be nice.
I grew up in a better world where people were smart enough to figure out when they were being played for a fool, and figuring that out not only pissed them off when they figured it out, but made them wiser.
The days when americans were smarter and less gullible would sure be nice.
I listened to his entire speech. You're in denial.
Jun 8, 2021 16:30:03 #
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-v**er-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH\\
Excerpt of final paragraph...
"VERDICT: Missing context. This clip of Biden allegedly “admitting” to v***r f***d has been shared out of context. As seen in the full interview, the former vice president was discussing his campaign’s v**er protection program".
Excerpt of final paragraph...
"VERDICT: Missing context. This clip of Biden allegedly “admitting” to v***r f***d has been shared out of context. As seen in the full interview, the former vice president was discussing his campaign’s v**er protection program".
I watched the whole thing when it first came out.
Why did the counting stop at the same time in 5 critical areas?
And then why did counting continue in secret?
Jun 8, 2021 21:19:23 #
woodguru wrote:
Are you capable of reading the full story and seeing that the statement was taken out of context?
I grew up in a better world where people were smart enough to figure out when they were being played for a fool, and figuring that out not only pissed them off when they figured it out, but made them wiser.
The days when americans were smarter and less gullible would sure be nice.
I grew up in a better world where people were smart enough to figure out when they were being played for a fool, and figuring that out not only pissed them off when they figured it out, but made them wiser.
The days when americans were smarter and less gullible would sure be nice.
I heard biden in a speech say. "I don't need your v**e". A politician not needing a v**e? Come on man.
Jun 9, 2021 02:28:00 #
woodguru wrote:
Which is why I called it a circle jerk. There is evidence of a certain degree of coordination, such as the tours given the day before by republicans.
"They" is every t*****rous i**********nist trying to disrupt democracy that was there, peaceful or not.
"They" is every t*****rous i**********nist trying to disrupt democracy that was there, peaceful or not.
There is evidence of a degree of coordination alright.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.