One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Steps to Cancel Biden’s Unlawful Actions
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 12, 2021 19:58:09   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
BOOM: GOP Outsmarts Biden by Finding a Clever Way to “Cancel” His Executive Orders

A good read, if you're so inclined.

https://patriotunitednews.com/boom-gop-outsmarts-biden-by-finding-a-clever-way-to-cancel-his-executive-orders-2/?utm_source=PUN%20Master&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:21042482&utm_campaign=Princess%20Diana%20Bombshell%20Revealed

The Republican led legislature in the State of South Dakota are taking a valiant stand to “Cancel” the unlawful, unconstitutional Executive Orders of the Biden/Harris regime. South Dakota HB1194 calls for the creation of the “Committee on Neutralization of Federal Laws”. Gateway Pundit reported, “which would determine the constitutionality of any given federal law and, if found wanting, would proceed to nullify it within the state.” The goal of this Committee would be to cancel any actions by the Biden/Harris Administration if they were to interfere with the rights of American citizens.

Governor Kristi Noem
@govkristinoem
"The Keystone XL pipeline brought jobs to our state. Those jobs are gone, devastating individual families and small businesses across South Dakota.

Today, I challenged the South Dakota media to cover those stories. If the @dcexaminer can do it, why not our own local press?"

“The Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council may review any executive order issued by the President of the United States, if the order has not been affirmed by a v**e of the Congress of the United States and signed into law, as prescribed by the Constitution of the United States,” the bill’s text reads.

The bill sets up a process for reviewing the president’s executive orders, which would be submitted to the governor and attorney general so that the attorney general could “determine whether the state should seek an exemption” from the order or have it “declared an unconstitutional exercise of legislative authority by the President.” (Our AG is as crooked as the governor! -Ginny)

“The bill takes a broad view, stating that no executive order may be implemented “that restricts a person’s rights.”

The proposed bill would also allow the attorney general to block implementation of any order deemed unconstitutional if the order refers to:

A p******c or other public health emergency
The regulation of natural resources
The regulation of the agricultural industry
The regulation of land use
The regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards
The regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms”

continued
BOOM: GOP Outsmarts Biden by Finding a Clever Way ... (show quote)

Reply
May 12, 2021 20:01:47   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
BOOM: GOP Outsmarts Biden by Finding a Clever Way to “Cancel” His Executive Orders

A good read, if you're so inclined.

https://patriotunitednews.com/boom-gop-outsmarts-biden-by-finding-a-clever-way-to-cancel-his-executive-orders-2/?utm_source=PUN%20Master&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:21042482&utm_campaign=Princess%20Diana%20Bombshell%20Revealed

The Republican led legislature in the State of South Dakota are taking a valiant stand to “Cancel” the unlawful, unconstitutional Executive Orders of the Biden/Harris regime. South Dakota HB1194 calls for the creation of the “Committee on Neutralization of Federal Laws”. Gateway Pundit reported, “which would determine the constitutionality of any given federal law and, if found wanting, would proceed to nullify it within the state.” The goal of this Committee would be to cancel any actions by the Biden/Harris Administration if they were to interfere with the rights of American citizens.

Governor Kristi Noem
@govkristinoem
"The Keystone XL pipeline brought jobs to our state. Those jobs are gone, devastating individual families and small businesses across South Dakota.

Today, I challenged the South Dakota media to cover those stories. If the @dcexaminer can do it, why not our own local press?"

“The Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council may review any executive order issued by the President of the United States, if the order has not been affirmed by a v**e of the Congress of the United States and signed into law, as prescribed by the Constitution of the United States,” the bill’s text reads.

The bill sets up a process for reviewing the president’s executive orders, which would be submitted to the governor and attorney general so that the attorney general could “determine whether the state should seek an exemption” from the order or have it “declared an unconstitutional exercise of legislative authority by the President.” (Our AG is as crooked as the governor! -Ginny)

“The bill takes a broad view, stating that no executive order may be implemented “that restricts a person’s rights.”

The proposed bill would also allow the attorney general to block implementation of any order deemed unconstitutional if the order refers to:

A p******c or other public health emergency
The regulation of natural resources
The regulation of the agricultural industry
The regulation of land use
The regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards
The regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms”

continued
BOOM: GOP Outsmarts Biden by Finding a Clever Way ... (show quote)


The question of who has the right to judge the constitutionality of law was decided by the Supreme Court long, long ago. The states do not have this power. Only the US Supreme Court has this power!

Reply
May 12, 2021 22:02:02   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
The question of who has the right to judge the constitutionality of law was decided by the Supreme Court long, long ago. The states do not have this power. Only the US Supreme Court has this power!


Actually, SCOTUS is supposed to interpret the law, not act as legislators. The federal government is supposed to be comprised of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. The law of the land is the U.S. Constitution - everything else is just codes and statutes. But one big problem developed in the 1950s when Eisenhower signed a bill making the judicial system Admiralty Law. When you see that gold-fringed American f**g in every courtroom today, it means the judge can use international law in his/her findings.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.