Kevyn wrote:
There were widows pensions for the soldiers and pensions for the veterans and wounded veterans the same as today. R********ns are not just for s***ery they are for discrimination in housing employment and education after the Second World War. Programs b****s were excluded from that pushed working class w****s into the middle class. They are for black farmers who were excluded from federal programs through the nineties effectively wiping out black farmers. They are for Jim Crow laws that made b****s second class citizens. They are for the continued denial of equal protection under the law to poor black citizens. They are for the exclusion of people of color from schools, public accommodations and clubs and organizations. And this list barely scratched the service.
There were widows pensions for the soldiers and pe... (
show quote)
So you think b****s - who have been given ample opportunities to improve themselves and their financial situations - because they are black and their ancestors were s***es - should be paid
more money now?
Since the passage of the Civil Rights Acts and the advent of the "Great Society" in 1965, trillions of dollars in t***sfer payments have been made to b****s in the form of welfare benefits and racial preferences (in contracts, job placements - called "Affirmative Action" and educational admissions - i.e., black scholarships)—all under the rationale of redressing historic racial grievances. B****s have advantages through programs such as UMBC Mentor Tech and Texas Tech, and many others are available to only b****s for college education. Banks have special low-rate programs to assist b****s in things like farming, housing, and other financial assistance programs meant only for b****s. Some b****s (in fact, I would guess the majority of them) have taken advantage of these programs. (Those that have not taken advantage of them
chose not to, that is not a problem that today's Americans should have to pay for.)
No evidence-based attempt has been made to prove that living b****s have been adversely affected by a s***e system that was ended over 150 years ago. But there is plenty of evidence the hardships that occurred were hardships that individuals could and did overcome. The black middle-class in America is a financially successful community that is now larger in established terms than black, poverty-stricken communities. Its existence suggests that economic adversity with b****s is the result of
failures of individual character rather than the lingering after-effects of racial discrimination and a s***e system that ceased to exist 150+ years ago. West Indian b****s in America are also descended from s***es, but their average incomes are equivalent to the average incomes of w****s (and nearly 25% higher than the average incomes of American-born b****s). How is it that s***ery adversely affected one large group of descendants but not the other?
There is no single group that is clearly responsible for the crime of s***ery. Black Africans and Arabs were responsible for enslaving the ancestors of b****s.
There were 3,000 black s***e-owners in the pre-Civil War United States. Are r********ns to be paid by their descendants too?
If s***e labor created wealth for Americans, then obviously it has created wealth for b***k A******ns as well,
including the descendants of s***es. The GNP of b****s in America is so large that it makes the black community the 10th most prosperous group in the world. American b****s on average enjoy per capita incomes in the range of twenty to fifty times that of b****s living in any of the African nations from which they were kidnapped.
Only a tiny minority of Americans ever owned s***es. For those who lived in the Pre-Civil War South, only one white in five was a s***e owner. Yes, those 360,222 solder's widows and veterans were paid a pension...that's true, but why should their descendants owe the debt that today's b****s claim? Do you claim we should "cancel" out those pensions they were paid for sacrificing their lives to help free b****s by paying for their r********ns now?
And what about the two huge waves of American immigration that occurred after 1880 and then again after 1960 and even now? What rationale would require Vietnamese boat people, Russian and Iranian refugees, and Armenian victims of the Turkish persecution, Jews,
Mexicans, Greeks, or Polish, Irish, Hungarian, Cambodian and Korean victims of C*******m, to pay r********ns to American
b****s?
And finally, if b****s insist on doing this, they will continue racial separatism. As long as they continue to demand special treatment and call themselves victims - because of what their ancestors were - they will keep themselves separate from other Americans. Establishing groups like B*M and Black Panthers does not help b****s....it hurts them.