Snow flake update.
RandyBrian wrote:
Sorry. Can not and will not comply when a baby is concerned. If you see a desperate Mom pushing a baby carriage into traffic, do you mind your own business?
To me apples and oranges.
To you, myob. A******n is not murder. It's a woman's choice. To bad you have such a fixation. Donate $ to your local PP so they can offer free contraceptives, if you really care about the masses of cells.
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
To me apples and oranges.
To you, myob. A******n is not murder. It's a woman's choice. To bad you have such a fixation. Donate $ to your local PP so they can offer free contraceptives, if you really care about the masses of cells.
I differ. A******n is murder, regardless of you being a science denier. It is NOT morally or ethically her choice. It is legally, and should not be. What you call fixation, I call standing my ground and defending it.
As for PP, with the billions of dollars they make, millions of which is offered them by democrats in government, why AREN'T they offering free birth control?
Could it be they want and encourage women, especially minorities, to get pregnant so their gravy train can continue?
RandyBrian wrote:
I differ. A******n is murder, regardless of you being a science denier. It is NOT morally or ethically her choice. It is legally, and should not be. What you call fixation, I call standing my ground and defending it.
As for PP, with the billions of dollars they make, millions of which is offered them by democrats in government, why AREN'T they offering free birth control?
Could it be they want and encourage women, especially minorities, to get pregnant so their gravy train can continue?
I differ. A******n is murder, regardless of you b... (
show quote)
Conspiracy theory much? Lol
If women don't have a right to choose, do you agree that rapists should be sterilized? Even Steven, so to speak.
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Conspiracy theory much? Lol
If women don't have a right to choose, do you agree that rapists should be sterilized? Even Steven, so to speak.
Not a conspiracy theory. Just recognizing selfish, self serving villains who are priming their own pump to keep the cash flowing in.
And yes, I have no problem with sterilizing rapists. Or taking more drastic action. ANYONE to sets out with the intent to harm another human being should be dealt with harshly. The vast majority of our country's social problems is that, for over 50 years, the idea of selfish self gratification has been taught and treated as socially acceptable by modern culture. Courtesy, decency, and doing what is right are not gone, but they are also nor longer commonly practiced as necessary and laudable character traits.
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
To me apples and oranges.
To you, myob. A******n is not murder. It's a woman's choice. To bad you have such a fixation. Donate $ to your local PP so they can offer free contraceptives, if you really care about the masses of cells.
Oh yes it is murder when a heartbeat can be detected at 7 weeks!! Stopping a human`s heartbeat by force is murder!!
RandyBrian wrote:
Not a conspiracy theory. Just recognizing selfish, self serving villains who are priming their own pump to keep the cash flowing in.
And yes, I have no problem with sterilizing rapists. Or taking more drastic action. ANYONE to sets out with the intent to harm another human being should be dealt with harshly. The vast majority of our country's social problems is that, for over 50 years, the idea of selfish self gratification has been taught and treated as socially acceptable by modern culture. Courtesy, decency, and doing what is right are not gone, but they are also nor longer commonly practiced as necessary and laudable character traits.
Not a conspiracy theory. Just recognizing selfish... (
show quote)
You insist on government intervention when it comes to a woman's protected right of privacy, but rail against government gun regulations that you consider infringement on your right to bear arms. Gun manufacturers and gun sellers also consider government safety regulations to be an interference on their right to prime their own pump with billions of dollars of gun sales.
DASHY wrote:
You insist on government intervention when it comes to a woman's protected right of privacy, but rail against government gun regulations that you consider infringement on your right to bear arms. Gun manufacturers and gun sellers also consider government safety regulations to be an interference on their right to prime their own pump with billions of dollars of gun sales.
Apples and oranges again. The rights of a child (to live) take precident over the "privacy" rights of a woman, a man, a couple, a group, or an organization.
Legal firearm makers and sellers encourage firearm safety and use for sport and self defense, and as a means to make money.
PP encourages the murder of children so they can make money committing the murders.
The 2nA is clearly spelled out in the Constitution.
The so called "right to privacy" is not. At the most, it is implied.
The right to an a******n is a legal fallacy that SCOTUS says is implied under the umbrella of the implied right to privacy. A twisted logic path that leaves it with no legitimate comparison to our God given rights under the Constitution.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.