Once they register all your guns the end is near (Page 12): All of you Leftwingers say we on the right will not debate you on facts. Well I bent over backwards to give you that chance.

son of witless

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Riiiight, LOL

All of you Leftwingers say we on the right will not debate you on facts. Well I bent over backwards to give you that chance. You failed.

If you ever become willing and ready, I am always here to give you a thorough and honest debate.

Right leaning Centrist

Sonny Magoo wrote:

"Trump’s merry band of t*****rs"
You lost me there.
I didn't see anything resembling an attempted takeover ..
A r**tous freak show 🤪..yes.
Assault rifle armed white m*****a?
Not!
I left Long Island 50 years ago because of thinking like yours

More likely, being a White Nationalist, you left Long Island because of People like him. (Jews)

Right leaning Centrist

saltwind 78 wrote:

As a former special ed teacher, I don't believe th... (show quote)

When it comes to gun control, there is no middle ground. I have been called a "gun nut" because I carry a 380 semi auto pistol for which I have a concealed carry permit. I have also been called a "gun grabber", because like you, I see no need for a private citizen to own an arsenal of military grade hardware

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Right leaning Centrist wrote:

When it comes to gun control, there is no middle ground. I have been called a "gun nut" because I carry a 380 semi auto pistol for which I have a concealed carry permit. I have also been called a "gun grabber", because like you, I see no need for a private citizen to own an arsenal of military grade hardware

Just what is military grade hardware in your opinion? I also carry a 380 semi auto. Sometimes I carry a double barrel.38 derringer. I have a gun collection, so why should I be looked at as a possible criminal because I own a couple AR-15’s?

Right leaning Centrist

JFlorio wrote:

Just what is military grade hardware in your opinion? I also carry a 380 semi auto. Sometimes I carry a double barrel.38 derringer. I have a gun collection, so why should I be looked at as a possible criminal because I own a couple AR-15’s?

If the law allows such ownership, then you are not a criminal. I do feel the line should be drawn somewhere as to what private citizens may own. Just not sure where to draw it

Right leaning Centrist

billy a wrote:

There is a man that has a collection of working Ci... (show quote)

No problem with this collector. Imagine doing a drive by shooting with a Maynard Carbine

Rose42

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Who says it doesn't work? It's never been tried to be able to say that.

Where was it ever said it was acceptable and not stop it, never said that either.

According to that comment I can say the same of the right, which is what you're always saying, correct...

Its not sacred to either.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Right leaning Centrist wrote:

If the law allows such ownership, then you are not a criminal. I do feel the line should be drawn somewhere as to what private citizens may own. Just not sure where to draw it

Just my humble opinion but if one can afford to own an aircraft carrier, one's second amendment rights should allow him to have one. And I've never owned a gun and probably never will.

Rose42

Right leaning Centrist wrote:

If the law allows such ownership, then you are not a criminal. I do feel the line should be drawn somewhere as to what private citizens may own. Just not sure where to draw it

And once drawn its pretty much guaranteed that line will move.

Right leaning Centrist

Parky60 wrote:

Just my humble opinion but if one can afford to own an aircraft carrier, one's second amendment rights should allow him to have one. And I've never owned a gun and probably never will.

Pretty hard to conceal if you are thinking of shooting up a school or house of worship

Cuda2020

American Vet wrote:

Your personal viewpoint, which is shared by others... (show quote)

If you have the right to k**l, does that make you a Natural man?

No I haven't, and if I were protecting my family I may, if wounding didn't stop them, but also in my opinion which is also shared by others I am for keeping guns if you wish, while I also believe improved laws are necessary today.

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

Just my humble opinion but if one can afford to own an aircraft carrier, one's second amendment rights should allow him to have one. And I've never owned a gun and probably never will.

Are you saying he has privilege's due to his property ownership and worth? Careful now...

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Right leaning Centrist wrote:

If the law allows such ownership, then you are not a criminal. I do feel the line should be drawn somewhere as to what private citizens may own. Just not sure where to draw it

The line is already drawn to include radiological, chemical, biological or nuclear. Ownership of most other weapons are legal on a federal level though not so in many states. Automatic weapons, tanks, grenades, flame throwers etc are all legal in some or most states. Ownership is not the issue. If and how the weapon is used or not used is the issue. The majority of weapons laws are designed to limit or restrict accessibility of weapons or make them too expensive to own rather than outlawing them, which, so far, would be unconstitutional.

Cuda2020

son of witless wrote:

All of you Leftwingers say we on the right will not debate you on facts. Well I bent over backwards to give you that chance. You failed.

If you ever become willing and ready, I am always here to give you a thorough and honest debate.

Yeah I failed, right, wh**ever you say. Talking to a denier with facts is talking to the wall.

son of witless

Barracuda2020 wrote:

Yeah I failed, right, wh**ever you say. Talking to a denier with facts is talking to the wall.

" What we've got here is a failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=452XjnaHr1A