Carlson shared a clip of former CIA director John Brennan speaking about domestic terrorism on MSNBC. Brennan was explaining that when hunting al-Qaeda, it was often looking for individuals numbering in the "single digits" and that many people who might be willing to commit violence in America are far more prevalent and are already equipped with the weapons to do so. Here's how Carlson interpreted Brennan's comment:

"John Brennan, the former CIA director, has isolated the real problem. The real problem is you. According to Brennan, anyone who disagrees with, say, Susan Rice is worse than Osama bin Laden and more dangerous," Carlson said. "These people, meaning you, have the weapons, these terrorists — and by terrorists Brennan means tens of millions of Americans who have a firearm at home and didn't v**e for Joe Biden — they're the threat, and we need to hunt them as we hunted al-Qaeda. You just saw the clip! That's what he said!"

That is twisting the t***h. This is what keeps us divided.

What Brennan doesn't realize is, we are millions and he can never tell which one of us is really what he defines as a terrorist. And as we are millions of in fact patriots, we know who the real terrorists are. He is in the top ten most wanted. And the cross hairs are tattooed on his back for ever more.

So, remember, he might be able to muster a hundred guns to come after us. Maybe a thousand. With a hundred million targets. We can muster a hundred million guns and we aren't even going to be aiming at those thousand. They are just hired guns. He may have a hundred loyalists. That is a million to one.

So, Brennan, bring it on. You will find true Americans are a formidible force, willing to fight for and defend our freedom from all enemies, foreign (China, Iran) and domestic (Brennan and his cabel, a****a, B*M, C*******ts, etc.)

And we aren't worried about the Police or Military. We will go after them as legally as possible, and as long as we never actually attack the Police and Military, like A****a and B*M thugs, and fight our battles as legally as possible and only resort to violence as a last resort, and never directed at them, even if they are guarding these real i**********nists, they will see the difference, and ultimately join us, for America and their own families.


Logically Right ... ISID

Seems to be some information is missing here, also drawing conclusions that what has happened in the past must be true for today or it's not accurate. For example winning those three states of Florida, Ohio, Iowa was not a guarantee to win as usual.
President-elect Joe Biden flipped five states from red to blue this e******n — Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Pennsylvania and Georgia, where he led over Trump.

What status does a *Bellwether county really have? The following county is the only county to have v**ed for the winner of the E*******l College in every e******n since 1980 was Clallam County, Washington. It last v**ed for a losing candidate in 1976. Most are from rural counties, that explains the numbers. If a person wins Manhattan, Manhasset, Brooklyn and Queens counties how many rural red counties can match it?

Your comments are legitimate, as individual points. The problem is that too many unusual situations require a second, third or even 10th look until all sides are satisfied.

Additionally, circumstances like PA, where Trump led by 700,000 v**es when the polls closed, and then a 4:00 AM spike occurred where hundreds of thousands of v**es suddenly appeared, all for Joe Biden, makes the whole thing suspect. Then, to see that the exact same things happened in all of those "swing" states; same circumstances, same results, and have never happened, anywhere north of Mexico, ever; you really have to wonder out loud.

However, a clean audit would make the whole thing clearer... and then those states all refuse to do an actual forensic audit...

Think, you write a check and it bounces. You know you have money in the account so you go to talk to the bank. The banker tells you their system doesn't make mistakes; pay the overdraught fee. You say that there must be a mistake and the banker tells you his books are private and you have no right to have them examined.

You say, OK, you must be wrong ang you pay the fee and go home, satisfied? The Hell you do!