More fact checks of rightwingnut lies (Page 2): It's one of my crudest, I admit. :sm09:...

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Rose42 wrote:

BigMike that gif is crude but perfect for the factnotfiction joker.

It's one of my crudest, I admit.

GoCubs Loc: Earth

BigMike wrote:

It's one of my crudest, I admit.

Lol!

Kitten Courageous Loc: The Derelict Ship Maggie's Revenge

Rose42 wrote:

BigMike that gif is crude but perfect for the factnotfiction joker.

Amazing! Absolutely astonishing! You give zero phks for not putting your above post into a private message. That would make Big Mike's gif apply even more to you than FNF. I am utterly amazed at how rude you are. You talk out of both sides of your mouth, both in front of your target, as well as behind them, too.

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

factnotfiction wrote:

As with all other lunatic rightwingnut claims of v***r f***d, the investigations are proving that the lies were just that lies, and the perps should sued, and then charged and convicted of the fraud they have used to stir the dim witted trump supporters, who believe anything.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-claim-chinese-investment-144905735.html

I want answers to the questions and anomalies that occurred in this e******n. Every e******n has some fraud and needs to be investigated. Those found guilty should receive the maximum penalty and safeguards should be developed to prevent it from happening again. It is not enough for those in charge to say there's nothing to see because we say so. With all the accusations of fraud, we need an open investigation to restore the confidence of the people and help the nation heal. If the way the e******n went happened exactly the same except all of the suspect incidents went in Trump's favor and he was the winner, would you have asked the same questions as the Trump supporters have?

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

BigMike wrote:

How many haven't been tossed out?

And the one's that were, can you say in legal terms why?

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/e******ns/2021/01/06/trumps-failed-efforts-overturn-e******n-numbers/4130307001/

Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the p**********l e******n, 61 have failed, according to Elias.

Some cases were dismissed for lack of standing and others based on the merits of the v***r f***d allegations. The decisions have came from both Democratic-appointed and Republican-appointed judges – including federal judges appointed by Trump.

More: 'It really is over now': The 24 hours that likely thwarted Trump's effort to overturn the e******n

State Supreme Courts in Arizona, Nevada and Arizona each rejected or declined to hear Trump’s appeals to overturn results in those states, while the Pennsylvania and Michigan supreme courts denied multiple lawsuits.

The 60th and 61st losses came in recent days.

The lone victory for the Trump team was a small one. A Pennsylvania judge sided with the Trump campaign, ruling that v**ers could not go back and “cure” their b****ts if they failed to provide proper identification three days after the e******n. The ruling affected few v**es and did not change the outcome in Pennsylvania, which Biden won by 81,660 v**es.

Big Kahuna

GoCubs wrote:

Not a lie. There IS no evidence. Figure it out, man. You can do it. I have faith in you.

Cubbie, you are the type of fool that would believe that the rope h*****g from Bubba Wallace's garage door was a noose and the drinking cups beside his water cooler were actually hoods that the KKK put there to intimidate r****t Bubba!! I have no faith in you.

victor doherty

BigMike wrote:

We demand an audit of those machines in the places... (show quote)

why is it you guys keep missing the big picture v**er pruging ,and not one of you will take the time to demaned a investagation.CALL YOUR SENATORS now!!!

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

victor doherty wrote:

why is it you guys keep missing the big picture v**er pruging ,and not one of you will take the time to demaned a investagation.CALL YOUR SENATORS now!!!

The purging of v**er rolls was mandated by the federal government. Some states hadn't updated their v**er rolls in decades. This is something that should be done on a regular basis. Establish a standard such as no v**e in 3 consecutive e******ns, then the e******n board sends a notice to the registered v**er. If the v**er doesn't respond in a set time period, i.e. 30 days, the v**er is removed from the v**er rolls. This can be computerized and done without indicating party affiliation.

victor doherty

Kickaha wrote:

The purging of v**er rolls was mandated by the federal government. Some states hadn't updated their v**er rolls in decades. This is something that should be done on a regular basis. Establish a standard such as no v**e in 3 consecutive e******ns, then the e******n board sends a notice to the registered v**er. If the v**er doesn't respond in a set time period, i.e. 30 days, the v**er is removed from the v**er rolls. This can be computerized and done without indicating party affiliation.

nice spin on facts but the t***h is they pruge million ,yes they did do the post card con .if you what to know more look up greg palast ,and kris kobach crosscheck .

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

victor doherty wrote:

nice spin on facts but the t***h is they pruge million ,yes they did do the post card con .if you what to know more look up greg palast ,and kris kobach crosscheck .

Are you claiming that the v**er rolls should never be cleaned up? I am not saying that any cleaning up of v**er rolls will be perfect, errors do happen. When an error is discovered it should be corrected immediately and it should be looked into to see if anything could have been done differently to prevent it from occurring. I am not involved with the e******n board, so I have no first-hand knowledge of the procedures they use. I was suggesting a starting point and we can go from there to work something out.

Genewood Loc: Rural Northern Rockies

BigMike wrote:

We demand an audit of those machines in the places... (show quote)

It would be nice to get some definitive answer from a t***sparent investigation somewhere. Instead of this constant claim and counterclaim, and fighting to the death to not allow an investigation. Otherwise, how's a fellow living in the Boonies have enough knowledge to even make an educated guess as to what is going on.

ChJoe

permafrost wrote:

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/e*... (show quote)

"Some cases were dismissed for lack of standing and others based on the merits of the v***r f***d allegations. The decisions have came from both Democratic-appointed and Republican-appointed judges – including federal judges appointed by Trump."

That is NOT a lack of evidence.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

ChJoe wrote:

"Some cases were dismissed for lack of standing and others based on the merits of the v***r f***d allegations. The decisions have came from both Democratic-appointed and Republican-appointed judges – including federal judges appointed by Trump."

That is NOT a lack of evidence.

Tell it to the Judge...

Whine much you little sissy?? The project at hand for years by McConnell was to stack the judicial system. even with hundreds of trump judges slipped into the system trump lost and his lackeys are not as needy as he figured they were, they chose the loyalty to the nation over loyalty to his fat a**... unlike you they have integrity, loyalty and ethics.. at least a smatter of them. Enough to rid the nation of the v***s in the oval office now gone and never missed..

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

permafrost wrote:

Tell it to the Judge... br br br Whine much you ... (show quote)

What most people want is an actual answer, not just being told that there's nothing to see and move along. There is an appearance of fraud, v**e manipulation and anomalies. Don't just tell us we are wrong, tell us why we are mistaken and what can be done to prevent it from happening again in the future. For example, in Pennsylvania there are three numbers that don't make sense. The state knows how many people are registered to v**e. They have the record of how many v**ed (that's how they can determine the turn out rate). They also know how many b****ts were counted. The number of people who v**ed cannot exceed the number of registered v**ers. If it does, you have fraud. The number of b****ts counted cannot exceed the number of people who v**ed. If it does, there is most likely fraud. While it doesn't prove the fraud or who committed it. It does warrant further investigation.

Mikeyavelli

ChJoe wrote:

You no can write good!

But he can order good in a Chinese restaurant.