Chucky Schmucker quote (Page 2): Don’t assume too much just because you read that sentence. There’s a lot more that goes to that then I think you’re able to comprehend.. Hint~~ Do you...

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Kevyn wrote:

Nonsense if convicted he is stripped of pension and benefits including secret service protection and barred from holding office in the future.

Don’t assume too much just because you read that sentence. There’s a lot more that goes to that then I think you’re able to comprehend..

Hint~~ Do you leave a President of the United States without protection so that he may be abducted with all the information he knows about the country?

Look up the rest..

DASHY

JW wrote:

What the Libs don't understand is that by trying to impeach him twice, they change his historical status from malefactor to celebrity victim. They make Pelosi into the stereotype of an evil BWITCH. She did it to herself.

What you don't seem to understand is that the defeated, former President Trump WAS actually impeached twice by the US House of Representatives. The first trial in the Senate ended in acquittal of Trump. The next one may have a different ending with Mitch McConnell sending a strong signal to his fellow Republicans to find the lying r**t instigator guilty as charged.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mcconnell-gives-gop-senators-permission-to-find-donald-trump-guilty/ar-BB1cNorc

Kevyn

lindajoy wrote:

Don’t assume too much just because you read that sentence. There’s a lot more that goes to that then I think you’re able to comprehend..

Hint~~ Do you leave a President of the United States without protection so that he may be abducted with all the information he knows about the country?

Look up the rest..

How could Putin have him abducted from Levensworth?

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Kevyn wrote:

Nonsense if convicted he is stripped of pension and benefits including secret service protection and barred from holding office in the future.

You're full of nonsense.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

DASHY wrote:

What you don't seem to understand is that the defeated, former President Trump WAS actually impeached twice by the US House of Representatives. The first trial in the Senate ended in acquittal of Trump. The next one may have a different ending with Mitch McConnell sending a strong signal to his fellow Republicans to find the lying r**t instigator guilty as charged.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mcconnell-gives-gop-senators-permission-to-find-donald-trump-guilty/ar-BB1cNorc

You should wait until this case has been decided. No one can foretell the future.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Grugore wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Congress has no authority to try a civilian. Right? As a civilian, Trump is entitled to a trial by a jury of his peers. It's in the Bill of Rights. Who do these clowns think they are?

i agree, but some authorities are trying to twist it their way. what trump did was no more then what a coach does in the locker room or at a friday night pep rally. certainly, not convictable. but it is a biased attack. and he was still talking when the incident started with left and right radicals leading the charge with separate agenda.

ChJoe

lindajoy wrote:

Don’t assume too much just because you read that sentence. There’s a lot more that goes to that then I think you’re able to comprehend..

Hint~~ Do you leave a President of the United States without protection so that he may be abducted with all the information he knows about the country?

Look up the rest..

Too challenging for kevy, linda. Be nice!

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Kevyn wrote:

Nonsense if convicted he is stripped of pension and benefits including secret service protection and barred from holding office in the future.

the real crime to america is putting the senile s**tgibbon into office with the camel toe waiting on when to use amendment 25 on the senile s**tgibbon

Grugore

Read the Constitution. It specifically states that impeachment is used only to remove someone from office. It has no other purpose. Impeaching a former President is unconstitutional. Period.

Kevyn wrote:

Nonsense if convicted he is stripped of pension and benefits including secret service protection and barred from holding office in the future.

Grugore

DASHY wrote:

What you don't seem to understand is that the defeated, former President Trump WAS actually impeached twice by the US House of Representatives. The first trial in the Senate ended in acquittal of Trump. The next one may have a different ending with Mitch McConnell sending a strong signal to his fellow Republicans to find the lying r**t instigator guilty as charged.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mcconnell-gives-gop-senators-permission-to-find-donald-trump-guilty/ar-BB1cNorc

Permission to find Donald Trump guilty? Think about what that means for a moment. Shouldn't he have said permission to discover the t***h? He has predetermined guilt. Does this not bother you at all?

DASHY

Grugore wrote:

Permission to find Donald Trump guilty? Think about what that means for a moment. Shouldn't he have said permission to discover the t***h? He has predetermined guilt. Does this not bother you at all?

Trump has proven his own guilt, confirmed by hours of video evidence. Most Republicans follow the leader when it comes to v****g. A few Republicans this time have decided to use their own eyes and ears and power of reasoning to consider the t***h. I admit, it is a rare exception to the McConnell rule. What bewilders me is why it took them so long to realize they actually have the ability to consider a v**e separate from their leader.

Grugore

DASHY wrote:

Trump has proven his own guilt, confirmed by hours of video evidence. Most Republicans follow the leader when it comes to v****g. A few Republicans this time have decided to use their own eyes and ears and power of reasoning to consider the t***h. I admit, it is a rare exception to the McConnell rule. What bewilders me is why it took them so long to realize they actually have the ability to consider a v**e separate from their leader.

Have some more kool-ade, chump.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

Grugore wrote:

Read the Constitution. It specifically states that impeachment is used only to remove someone from office. It has no other purpose. Impeaching a former President is unconstitutional. Period.

He wasn't a former President when impeached the 2nd time. So why shouldn't he face trial for high crimes and misdemeanors? There's no 'only' in the Constitution on impeachment.

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Nothing there says only a sitting President can be tried by the Senate. What would stop a sitting President from issuing an EO that t***sfers Treasury money into their private accounts on the morning of inauguration of another individual? Who would have standing to try that theft? Not the States. The incoming Justice Department? Would you back that?

Impeachment power was given to Congress, and they decide how and when the process occurs.

Grugore

working class stiff wrote:

He wasn't a former President when impeached the 2n... (show quote)

The Constitution has the final say. Impeachment is for the removal of someone from office. Trump is no longer President, therefore he cannot be impeached.

ChJoe

working class stiff wrote:

He wasn't a former President when impeached the 2n... (show quote)

Because it is for removal from office. He's now not in office. There is no removal needed.

You h**ers just want more flesh; you want to squash Trump, your h**e is so egregious. It is obvious the l*****ts democrats are scared of Trump and see that he might actually be able to come back at them, and he might.