America?
Jan 20, 2021 18:57:32 #
hbmac10 wrote:
All summer long all you herd was defund the police. On j** 6th at the capitol all you herd was were are the cops.
I think it scared the s""t out of all of them and all of a sudden they support the police.
Hypocritical don't ya think.
I think it scared the s""t out of all of them and all of a sudden they support the police.
Hypocritical don't ya think.
Yep, been saying exact same thing! They did get the You know what scared out of them and they should’ve been standing up owning up to what they didn’t do to secure the property in the face of eminent danger they all knew about no less, along with the FBI keeping it a secret that they too new three days before...
Jan 20, 2021 19:01:54 #
Capt-jack wrote:
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Wednesday she wants fines of up to $10,000 for lawmakers who refuse to be screened for firearms at entrances to the House of Representatives, following the J****** 6 violent attack on the Capitol by pro-Trump r****rs.
No court in the land allows guns inside
Jan 20, 2021 19:16:59 #
woodguru wrote:
No court in the land allows guns inside
If Federal courts then I agree, however state level courts do allow...
All three branches of our governments should work together to promulgate, promote, and provide for responsible firearm regulations in courthouses, judicial centers, and court facilities. However, there is no uniformity among the state laws as to who may carry a firearm in a courtroom or a courthouse, nor to what extent or areas a judge may exercise discretion in limiting the possession of firearms. The National Center for State Courts did an exhaustive survey that examined the laws of all the states. 4 While the majority of the states restrict firearm possession in the courtroom, only a small number restrict firearms in the courthouse. Additionally, most states allow so many exemptions as to make any ban of firearms useless.
The recent uptick in interest can be traced back to two items: the U.S. Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), holding that the Second Amendment included an individual right to keep and bear arms, coupled with several high-profile courthouse shootings. These events have prompted efforts to redefine who can carry a firearm in a courthouse and where firearm bans may be imposed. For the most part, such efforts have been designed to expand the ability of individuals to carry guns into courthouses and, in some instances, directly into courtrooms.”
A good article you may wish to read..
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_interest/gun_violence/policy/19A105/
Jan 20, 2021 19:56:04 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
lindajoy wrote:
Yet, they have done a good job blaming the C*****l... (show quote)
I know she wasn't in direct accountability of Capital security. Your kind correction is appreciated and I can see you know what it is you are talking about.
Now witness the alternative. Instead of no security, they revert to 30,000 troops and fire power for a war.
If Putin had designs on taking us down, he certainly has seen the stupidity of our defenses. And China, definitely having designs on that very thing. Watch out cause they just learned a lot. And when a billion Chinamen/women/persons/g****red folk move, they move like ants upon the land. The oceans are our walls and thank the heavens for that.
Jan 20, 2021 20:46:49 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
I know she wasn't in direct accountability of Capi... (show quote)
The alternative was just as incompetent as the first Go around... You just can’t fix stupid echos loud and clear.~~~
Jan 20, 2021 20:54:08 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
lindajoy wrote:
The alternative was just as incompetent as the first Go around... You just can’t fix stupid echos loud and clear.~~~
So true!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.