SSDD

Specifically, "2. None of his supporters would have v**ed for a third term... Unconstitutional... Some might have supported a run by one of his kids..." Are you REALLY sure about that? Case in point, look at skyrider's reply to that very same post that you are replying to.




Additionally, you don't recall what quite a few Trumplicans said when it was suggested in the past or what an alarmingly great number said when it was suggested that Trump would announce himself "King of America". Constitutionality is not many of these Trumplicans' primary concern, Trumplicans are more party over country, as is evidenced here on OPP on just about a daily basis.

Rose42

You confuse your opinion with fact yet again. As always rumitoid your love of this country is no greater than anyone else’s - trump
supporter or not. You’ve never demonstrated it. Hating trump
doesn’t mean you love this country.

SSDD

That would be because you turn a deaf ear to anything you do not wish to hear, Trump himself has suggested that he should have more than two terms and many Trumplicans have supported that idea.

SSDD

He has been doing nothing but dividing since BEFORE he was elected. What? You think you create unity by continually bad mouthing everyone that doesn't agree with you?

Rose42

You mean like you constantly do? How very trumpian.

Larry Joe

Michael10, that question does not deserve a response.
Your Friend,
Larry Joe

SSDD

There were three questions, while the last one was purely speculative, the first two were honest, legitimate questions worthy of an answer. Would you be willing to answer the first two?

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

Your reply to me is irrelevant to what I said. I never addressed any discussion of a third term for Trump. He (and all other Presidents) are constitutionally barred from serving more than two terms.

Larry Joe

SSDD, l went back and reread the post. There were no questions asked in the first paragraph. The two questions asked in the second paragraph, was what I didn’t feel deserved a response.
Your Friend,
Larry Joe

SSDD

Really? So... You DIDN'T reply to, Michael10's post (posted below) with "I have never heard anyone in the Republican party or the Trump administration advocate anything anywhere near those allegations."?


Michael10's post:

"Several months ago I posted here on OPP that trump would burn this country to the ground before he left office. Well he came very close to just that and if he had won this e******n he would have installed himself as king over America. I hear many of you saying how bad things will be under Biden, at the very least he won't be trying to divide this country more.
Question: how many of the trump supporters here would have v**ed for a third term If he had managed to win this one and would you have still supported his sons or daughter to take his place when he died? Would you have stood by and watched Democrats herded up and tossed into ovens cause that's where this mad man was going"

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-207153-1.html#3605166

Kickaha's reply to Michael10's OP:

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-207153-2.html#3606251

So, what "internal mental dialogue" were you responding to? Like you even have an in "internal mental dialogue", you just plain don't think at all it would seem. Go ahead, try to pretend you didn't say what you did. Try to pretend it wasn't related to Michael10's post that I reposted here. Unless you are completely brain dead, and I am not saying that you aren't, how would "how many of the trump supporters here would have v**ed for a third term If he had managed to win this one" NOT be an allegation that SOMEONE has suggested that Trump was entitled to more than two terms, Trump himself has said that very thing more than once, Trump might try for more than two terms, again, Trump himself has suggested that very idea more than once, and/or that Trump would have the full support of his Trumplican base if he did try for more than two terms, plenty of OPP Trumplicans have said they would fully support that and v**e for him if he did try for more than two terms and some have even voiced support of a "King Trump" even. Or are you saying that "I have never heard anyone in the Republican party or the Trump administration advocate anything anywhere near those allegations." is not in regards to "how many of the trump supporters here would have v**ed for a third term If he had managed to win this one"? Well, I h**e to break it to you, but since you DID NOT exempt that question from your reply, it was most definitely covered in your blanket reply. Go back and look, no exemption...


Oops, caught you with no valid excuses haven't I? If you plan to feign indignation, at least make up a valid excuse for your f**e indignation.

SSDD

You are correct, no questions asked in the first paragraph, but then I never said there WAS a question in the first paragraph, but really? You only counted two questions in paragraph two? Really? Okay, let me go back and count them again.

"Question: 1. how many of the trump supporters here would have v**ed for a third term If he had managed to win this one and 2. would you have still supported his sons or daughter to take his place when he died? 3. Would you have stood by and watched Democrats herded up and tossed into ovens cause that's where this mad man was going"


Damn, I can't find that third question, can you?

As for "The two questions asked in the second paragraph, was what I didn’t feel deserved a response.", while I will admit, question number three being pure speculation and nothing I have heard suggests that anybody even considered that option and therefore likely not worth replying to, the first two are completely legitimate questions and worthy of an answer, even if the answer is that you don't care to answer the question, at least that would be an honest answer, unlike the answer you gave, that they were unworthy of a reply. I know, how dare I ask for and expect honesty from a Trumplican...

SSDD

Incorrect, I AM NOT mis-stating anything, deliberately or not, if there IS a mis-statement, it is on your part, not mine. I have taken your words literally, they only ways they appear to be intended to be taken, or were you trying to be sarcastic and it didn't come across? You do not use a blanket statement unless it is meant to cover the entirety of the post you are replying to or you state the portion it applies to directly.

I do appreciate your honesty in your statement, "I would say you are a moron, but that would just get me in trouble with admin and would not be an accurate description of you.". That honesty is seriously lacking here on OPP. I would love to see more of that kind of honesty here on OPP and everywhere throughout our lives.

Yes, American presidents ARE constitutionally prohibited from serving a third term, but then Trump never was one to follow the constitution as was evidenced by his inordinately large number of shut down EOs due to not being constitutional. His supporters, the Trumplicans also don't give two s**ts about the constitution either.



"What I was addressing was the allegations that Trump or Trump supporters wanted to throw liberals/democrats into ovens. What I said was the liberals/democrats want all Trump supporters to lose their jobs, be barred from air travel and having other restrictions on their mobility, lose their freedom of speech and be sent to reeducation camps."



The first part... Considering some of their un-American actions, they DESERVE being exiled! One DOES NOT try to o*******w our government WITHOUT just cause and believe me, THEY HAD NO JUST CAUSE! IF our government chose to consider exiling those i**********nists, I would support that cause. As for Trump's enablers within congress... Their actions were ALSO un-American as well, just not as criminally liable. They DO deserve to be removed from congress and prevented from holding public office ever again, just not fully sure I would support exile for them. As far as I am concerned they should be entitled to work jobs, just not hold pubic office. NOBODY should be above the law, NOBODY should be allowed to do as they wish without consequence. If four years from now they same thing were to happen, not likely, but let's just say that it does, I would be saying these precise words four years from now as well.

As for the second part... NOBODY is saying that they should lose their first amendment rights, NOBODY. It is nothing more than just another fringe RW CT. As for the second portion,"be sent to reeducation camps.", I am certain NOBODY is seriously considering that option, I am certain it is nothing but a frustration that you people refuse to accept reality, refuse to accept the t***h and refuse to accept facts that support the t***h and reality. Whether something like that may or may not be necessary to get you people to finally accept t***h, facts and reality, I seriously doubt that America will resort to "re-education" or "deprogramming" camps to "right the heads" of Trumplicans, it does not bode well and the optics would be extremely troubling, I can not see any way that I would support anything so drastic or rife with troubling ramifications.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

When is it you were appointed judge and jury?
It's doubtful anybody gives a rat's ass what you support or do not support.

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

I intend to give SSDD the attention his comments deserve. Apparently, he doesn't listen to any news as the statements wanting to punish anyone who v**ed for Trump or supported him in any way needs to be purge form society, reprogrammed (Katie Curic), have their speech censured (AOC), sent to reeducation camps, lose their jobs, etc.

jimjd18495

All the burning you refer to was ALL done in democrat run cities. A****A, the C*****l P****e and some democrats were responsible for the Capitol r**ts, not Trump supporters. For the past four years, it has been the democrats doing the burning and dividing. That's a fact.