Would This Affect A SCOTUS Decision? (Page 3): Think about this. There isn't a single Conservative on the Supreme Court who hasn't suffered abuse from l*****ts. Remember Clarence...

Grugore

ImLogicallyRight wrote:

What you need to realize is that although obama appointed some real left wing crackpots, they are marginally scholars and they have lifetime appointments not requiring loyalty to Biden. Why on earth would they compromise legitimacy of the court to support that senile old man and his crime syndicate that just tried to steal an e******n, against the facts and t***h of that fraud?

Think about this. There isn't a single Conservative on the Supreme Court who hasn't suffered abuse from l*****ts. Remember Clarence Thomas? How about Brett Cavenaugh? Probably spelled that wrong. And, most recently, Amy Coney Barret. This is their golden opportunity to uphold the Constitution while giving the finger to democrats. I'm not worried.

CarryOn

Grugore wrote:

Think about this. There isn't a single Conservative on the Supreme Court who hasn't suffered abuse from l*****ts. Remember Clarence Thomas? How about Brett Cavenaugh? Probably spelled that wrong. And, most recently, Amy Coney Barret. This is their golden opportunity to uphold the Constitution while giving the finger to democrats. I'm not worried.

Good point, grugore. Had not thought of that. They got to see and feel the l*****ts' wrath and hunger for power first hand.

Grugore

CarryOn wrote:

Good point, grugore. Had not thought of that. They got to see and feel the l*****ts' wrath and hunger for power first hand.

Exactly. Also, that panel of republican judges who threw out Trumps case in PA? I believe that they did it simply to expedite the case on its way to the Supreme Court. There is a lot more going on here than most people realize.
If trump pull this off, I really hope someone makes a movie about it.

CarryOn

Grugore wrote:

Exactly. Also, that panel of republican judges who threw out Trumps case in PA? I believe that they did it simply to expedite the case on its way to the Supreme Court. There is a lot more going on here than most people realize.
If trump pull this off, I really hope someone makes a movie about it.

Yes, I totally agree with you on the PA case. This will end up in the Supreme Court regardless of who wins or loses the battles along the way, but it has to go through the court system. And the sooner they get it to SCOTUS the better. There is so much misinformation about the court cases, and the msm are doing their best to make it sound as bad for Trump as possible. We just have to wait it out and see what happens .. and ignore the naysayers.

Seth

Grugore wrote:

Think about this. There isn't a single Conservative on the Supreme Court who hasn't suffered abuse from l*****ts. Remember Clarence Thomas? How about Brett Cavenaugh? Probably spelled that wrong. And, most recently, Amy Coney Barret. This is their golden opportunity to uphold the Constitution while giving the finger to democrats. I'm not worried.

Works for me!

Big Kahuna

Liberty Tree wrote:

If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?

Either way it goes, the left will be r**ting. If Slo Joe wins, the left will feel emboldened and start on their power hungry rant to start harassing conservatives who will then fight back and overwhelm the Marxists/demorats. Of course a Trump victory will be publicized by the very corrupt media as a steal by Trump and cause r**ts too. Trump will not hold back this time as the DoD moves in to quell the r****rs and place them under arrest. Many demorats and even some Repubs will be charged with s******n and treason and will have been implicated in trying to subvert our e******n. H*****gs will begin.

Big Kahuna

CarryOn wrote:

.. would the left's big threat of packing the Supr... (show quote)

You are so right CarryOn.

Big Kahuna

Lonewolf wrote:

You need a case whuch requires eveidenc something trump lawyers lack at least in 30 court cases.

Overwhelming evidence has been shown and more is coming forward. The idea that there is no evidence is like catching a bank robber with satchels of money on his possession and then declaring there is no evidence. What a bogus claim.

Big Kahuna

Hug wrote:

Yes, of course..Don't believe Trump can win at the Supreme Court because of the threats from the left and the fact that Roberts is owned by Obama.

Roberts may have been caught on Epstein Island with a little boy from some of the reports circulating. He is c*********d and is trying to save his arse.

Holdenbeach4u Loc: Holden Beach , NC

Trump lawyers got a hard road to go to overturn the E******n of 2020.
The big question is:
The Left is pushing Socialism which will not be good the the USA
The Right is pushing Free Capitalism which we have now .
Look at Venezuela, they went to Socialism many years back and the people have nothing to work for.

Big Kahuna

Holdenbeach4u wrote:

Trump lawyers got a hard road to go to overturn the E******n of 2020.
The big question is:
The Left is pushing Socialism which will not be good the the USA
The Right is pushing Free Capitalism which we have now .
Look at Venezuela, they went to Socialism many years back and the people have nothing to work for.

Nothing to overturn as Slo Joe has not officially won this e******n. Only the dems and their whores, the msm has pronounced Slo Joe the winner. I repeat, Slo Joe has not won this e******n. Don't fall for the dems propaganda.

SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now

drlarrygino wrote:

Roberts may have been caught on Epstein Island with a little boy from some of the reports circulating. He is c*********d and is trying to save his arse.

I thought maybe someone had pictures of him with farm animals. I'm convinced someone somewhere has something on Roberts and I love to know who and what. The little boy (or girl?) theory on Epstein Island might be true. Something damn sure is.

CarryOn

drlarrygino wrote:

Overwhelming evidence has been shown and more is coming forward. The idea that there is no evidence is like catching a bank robber with satchels of money on his possession and then declaring there is no evidence. What a bogus claim.

Tired of that bogus claim, too. Repeating it over and over does not make it so, but they keep trying.

FallenOak Loc: St George Utah

Liberty Tree wrote:

My question is not should it but would it? I agree someone has gotten to Roberts.

Looking back around 70 years we see that Justices appointed by Reps do not follow party lines. We also see that Dems follow strict party lines until they die. The one I remember most but the Dred Scott decision comes to mind also. Ike appointed Warren to the Supreme Court and Warren began to differ from Ike soon after the appointment. Like realtors say, “Location, location, location.” History shows, “Precedent, precedent, precedent.”

F.D.R.

Liberty Tree wrote:

If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?

That's not their job. It's their job to decide on the facts of the case. Let the chips fall where they may.