Would This Affect A SCOTUS Decision?
Nov 28, 2020 19:55:21 #
Kevyn wrote:
What you need to realize is that although Trump appointed some real right wing crackpots, they are marginally scholars and they have lifetime appointments not requiring loyalty to trump. Why on earth would they compromise legitimacy of the court to support your i***t knucklehead against fact and t***h?
The Supreme Court is not judging either side, their concerns are narrow; what does the contested state's Constitution have to say about e******ns and what does each state's law say about major procurement. Neither friendships, loyalty to a political party, or how many k**lers will swarm the streets have any place in their decisions.
Nov 28, 2020 19:56:46 #
Grugore wrote:
Kevyn. I'm trying to decide who the biggest liberal troll is on this site. It's not easy. The competition is incredibly fierce . But you are on my top 10 list .
He is on my ignore list.
Nov 28, 2020 20:04:19 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
==================
I always make decision based on principles. Not fear. If we are intimidated by fear, this will become a precedence, that the following years ahead will always rule like this. When we cater to allowing the wrong, everything we live for does have no meaning at all. That diminishes our ways of of living, not worthy to live for. God's ways are mostly difficult for us to follow but the end results, are comfortable and peaceful. That is how we must make decision.
We must not be intimidated by fear. The system will get worst, and find no solution for the better. The bad or the left will always be violent, unless we always give their ways.
God always chooses the right to be strong.
Nov 28, 2020 20:33:20 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
Maybe that’s why those in the know are saying the Supremes won’t touch this.
Nov 28, 2020 20:51:27 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
Maybe that’s why those in the know are saying the Supremes won’t touch this.
That is my thinking.
Nov 28, 2020 21:27:47 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
=================
First off, Giuliani is weak and I don't really have confidence on his assertions of the facts. Those thousands summary of testimonies will not work without supporting facts or numbers to prove. Giuliani used to be a very good mayor. But now, every time I listen to his defense, they don't convince me at all, what he has been putting up. I get upset hearing them. He can't even convince me, what more of the Justices. I demand more evidence than those he is presenting. They are not actual, but verbal. the actual evidence is the number that will prove and support how many v**es where fraudulently stolen, and how were they stolen.
I wish Sidney was not released. She could prove all those, and she knows how., This e******n is now gone to the thief Biden. This e******n has been stolen!!
Nov 28, 2020 21:41:03 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
It shouldn't. They are supposed to be arbiters of the Constitution, period.
If they allow outside concerns to affect their decisions, they do not belong on the Court.
It would essentially mean that justice was surrendering to terrorists.
Nov 28, 2020 21:46:30 #
Lonewolf wrote:
You need a case whuch requires eveidenc something trump lawyers lack at least in 30 court cases.
There's that durn "eveidenc" again. Is that some medication you administer to a constipated aardvark? Is it a dressing you put on your cale? A type of magnet, maybe?
Nov 28, 2020 21:51:00 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
Why not, it doesn't seem like the Constitution plays very much. 
Nov 28, 2020 22:16:06 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
Not gonna happen. The SCOTUS learned its lesson meddling in the 2000 e******n.
Nov 28, 2020 22:18:19 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the case reaches the SCOTUS the Justices know if they rule in Biden's favor the right will be upset and protest but will not result to violence. If they rule in Trump's favor they know the left will r**t, burn, commit acts of violence and become anarchists more than ever. Would that affect ther decision?
NO
Nov 28, 2020 22:22:08 #
Lonewolf wrote:
You need a case whuch requires eveidenc something trump lawyers lack at least in 30 court cases.
***You need a case whuch requires eveidenc something trump lawyers lack at least in 30 court cases.
>>>You need a case which requires brain cells. Something you lack at least 30 opinions a day. .
Nov 28, 2020 22:25:35 #
Lonewolf wrote:
You need a case whuch requires eveidenc something trump lawyers lack at least in 30 court cases. Trump has done more damage to our country more than an enemy could hope for.
***Trump has done more damage to our country more than an enemy could hope for.
>>>You have done more damage to intelligent dialog on OPP than almost all of the other hacks could hope for. Try thinking for once.
Nov 28, 2020 22:29:11 #
Kevyn wrote:
What you need to realize is that although Trump appointed some real right wing crackpots, they are marginally scholars and they have lifetime appointments not requiring loyalty to trump. Why on earth would they compromise legitimacy of the court to support your i***t knucklehead against fact and t***h?
What you need to realize is that although obama appointed some real left wing crackpots, they are marginally scholars and they have lifetime appointments not requiring loyalty to Biden. Why on earth would they compromise legitimacy of the court to support that senile old man and his crime syndicate that just tried to steal an e******n, against the facts and t***h of that fraud?
Nov 28, 2020 22:30:12 #
Grugore wrote:
Kevyn. I'm trying to decide who the biggest liberal troll is on this site. It's not easy. The competition is incredibly fierce . But you are on my top 10 list .
I've got him in the top 3.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.