One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sydney Powell to File her HISTORICAL LAWSUIT on Wednesday!
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
Nov 29, 2020 22:21:28   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Seth wrote:
When this v***r f***d endeavor has been exposed and Trump is being sworn in for his second term, there will be plenty to see there, and the 2022 e******ns will see v**ers treating the Democrats like the proverbial red-headed step children.


Seems like they did in 2020, but D******n and people like Stacey Abrams helped c***t the v**e for Biden.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 00:49:49   #
Seth
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Seems like they did in 2020, but D******n and people like Stacey Abrams helped c***t the v**e for Biden.


Expose this one, the next one will be monitored a lot more closely and there will be no D******n or D******n type software anyplace in the mix.

And mail-in v****g won't be repeated beyond absentee b****ts, as before.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 08:51:34   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Seth wrote:
Expose this one, the next one will be monitored a lot more closely and there will be no D******n or D******n type software anyplace in the mix.

And mail-in v****g won't be repeated beyond absentee b****ts, as before.


I'll never trust the v****g process again.
I work it for my county mainly because I'm one of the 4 Republicans in it, but generally, the e******ns are r****d, and have been since the e******n of Obama.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 11:29:35   #
Seth
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I'll never trust the v****g process again.
I work it for my county mainly because I'm one of the 4 Republicans in it, but generally, the e******ns are r****d, and have been since the e******n of Obama.


To tell the t***h, if they get away with this one, I will have second thoughts about bothering to go to the polls in the future.

I'm sure I am not the only American who feels that way; if the Democrats are allowed to get away with rigging an e******n at this point, when we've already seen how ready and capable they are where weaponizing government agencies for political gain is concerned, then it will show we are already in banana republic territory and have already lost our republic.

From that point, the only way back would be via banana republic methods, meaning we would have to replace b****ts with bullets.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 17:18:20   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Seth wrote:
To tell the t***h, if they get away with this one, I will have second thoughts about bothering to go to the polls in the future.

I'm sure I am not the only American who feels that way; if the Democrats are allowed to get away with rigging an e******n at this point, when we've already seen how ready and capable they are where weaponizing government agencies for political gain is concerned, then it will show we are already in banana republic territory and have already lost our republic.

From that point, the only way back would be via banana republic methods, meaning we would have to replace b****ts with bullets.
To tell the t***h, if they get away with this one,... (show quote)


Yep, we have to shoot our way out of this one.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 19:03:02   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Seth wrote:
What about it? There is a preponderance of evidence that this is indeed the case, your ilk dismisses it as "conspiracy theories" as you do everything else that exposes the myriad proclivities of your chosen political party.

There should be a sign over the door of DNC headquarters that reads: "Nothing to see here."


Can you site any "evidence" that there is a preponderance of?

We keep asking. The judicial system keeps calling the lawsuits frivolous and without merit. If I were a betting person, I'd bet chump and team jokes-for-lawyers are trying to get it to the SC. But they will be handed their asses.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 19:05:03   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I'll never trust the v****g process again.
I work it for my county mainly because I'm one of the 4 Republicans in it, but generally, the e******ns are r****d, and have been since the e******n of Obama.



You mean like the one in 2016 when social media spewed nonsense about Hillary and her child-eating cult?

And folks like you believed it.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 19:14:21   #
Seth
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Can you site any "evidence" that there is a preponderance of?

We keep asking. The judicial system keeps calling the lawsuits frivolous and without merit. If I were a betting person, I'd bet chump and team jokes-for-lawyers are trying to get it to the SC. But they will be handed their asses.


There have been links to found evidence posted here for days, and even with hundreds of signed, sworn affidavits and testimony by insiders of severe irregularities, your ilk writes it all off as conspiracy theories.

Yet all it takes is a single unproven accusation against Trump, a Trump nominee or associate and you lefties are howling for blood.

Why don't you can the hypocrisy and the rest of the bulls**t and wait to see what happens when it really counts, two weeks down the road?

This has become just plain stupid, trying to respectfully discourse with a bunch of myopic lefties who will still deny that won Trump even if he is sworn in in January.

I'm done with this pointless idiocy.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 19:44:38   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Seth wrote:
There have been links to found evidence posted here for days, and even with hundreds of signed, sworn affidavits and testimony by insiders of severe irregularities, your ilk writes it all off as conspiracy theories.

Yet all it takes is a single unproven accusation against Trump, a Trump nominee or associate and you lefties are howling for blood.

Why don't you can the hypocrisy and the rest of the bulls**t and wait to see what happens when it really counts, two weeks down the road?

This has become just plain stupid, trying to respectfully discourse with a bunch of myopic lefties who will still deny that won Trump even if he is sworn in in January.

I'm done with this pointless idiocy.
There have been links to found evidence posted her... (show quote)


I wonder why your United Stated of America has a judicial system that isn't succumbing to your conspiracy theories or "hundreds of signed, sworn affidavits and testimony by insiders of severe irregularities"?

Maybe because they provided no EVIDENCE. You can't just make stuff up. The courts require proof.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:13:26   #
Seth
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
I wonder why your United Stated of America has a judicial system that isn't succumbing to your conspiracy theories or "hundreds of signed, sworn affidavits and testimony by insiders of severe irregularities"?

Maybe because they provided no EVIDENCE. You can't just make stuff up. The courts require proof.


As I've said, I'm tired of trying to make a point with myopic lefties, so my next comment on the issue will be after the E*******l College v**es.

At this point, it has become an i***tic one way dialogue, totally moot, better left until a winner has been made official.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:17:12   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Seth wrote:
As I've said, I'm tired of trying to make a point with myopic lefties, so my next comment on the issue will be after the E*******l College v**es.

At this point, it has become an i***tic one way dialogue, totally moot, better left until a winner has been made official.


Just change 'myopic lefties' with rwnjs and I completely agree.

Good bye.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 20:22:26   #
Seth
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Just change 'myopic lefties' with rwnjs and I completely agree.

Good bye.


Except that the "n" is a misspelling.

"Knowledgeable" begins with a "K."

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:25:25   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Seth wrote:
Except that the "n" is a misspelling.

"Knowledgeable" begins with a "K."


Yes, we'll keep knowledgeable in quotes.

Rw"k"js. Are you happier now?

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:26:28   #
Seth
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Yes, we'll keep knowledgeable in quotes.

Rw"k"js. Are you happier now?



Reply
Nov 30, 2020 20:59:43   #
Mikeyavelli
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
You mean like the one in 2016 when social media spewed nonsense about Hillary and her child-eating cult?

And folks like you believed it.


She does have the disease. She's a cannibal through and through. C****e t*****r too. And ugly.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.