Michael10 wrote:
Pulling out of the Climate accord, the planet is doing everything bad climate scientists said it would 30 years ago
Tax breaks for the rich, now the burden of paying this countries debt in on the middle class.
building a wall on the southern border, waist of money there are much better ways to protect the border drones are much cheaper.
Separating children from their parents and putting them in cages, cause that just ain't right
Paying farmers billions for his failed tariffs, this will never end that business isn't coming back.
Supporting clean coal, these plants are long overdue closing and big polluters plus the coal ash left deal with
No health care plan, he'll try to k**l the ACA and have nothing to replace it.
I could go on and on but it'd take all night to type it up
Which of his policies do you like and why?
Pulling out of the Climate accord, the planet is d... (
show quote)
***Pulling out of the Climate accord, the planet is doing everything bad climate scientists said it would 30 years ago
"The poorly negotiated Paris climate accord imposed unfair, unworkable and unrealistic targets on the United States for reducing carbon emissions. As the climate deal punished America’s energy producers with expensive and burdensome regulations, it gave other countries U.S. taxpayer-funded subsidies and generous timelines.
Countries like China got a free pass to pollute for over a decade. With abundant low-cost coal, China and India would put our manufacturers at a huge competitive disadvantage. Economic costs would be severe.
According to the National Economic Research Associates, if we met all of our commitments as part of the Paris climate agreement, it would cost the American economy $3 trillion and 6.5 million industrial sector jobs by 2040. We don’t need to cripple our economy to protect our environment.
America’s emissions actually continue to decline, and we are the world’s driver of innovative solutions. Since 2005, the United States has reduced its combustion-related carbon dioxide emissions more than any other nation in the world.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/11/05/president-trump-leave-bad-paris-agreement-john-barrasso-editorials-debates/4170938002/***Tax breaks for the rich, now the burden of paying this countries debt in on the middle class.
"Vice President Joe Biden’s campaign website says, “Tax experts estimate that over the long run, 83% of Trump’s tax giveaway will flow to the top 1% of earners in this country.” That’s not quite fair to the president, though. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was far from perfect, it did cut taxes on the middle class and fueled the economic growth that brought unemployment rates to half-century lows before the p******c.
The 83% claim comes from a study by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and refers to rates in 2027, which is after almost all of the TCJA cuts of individual income taxes are slated to expire. A fairer benchmark is what would happen to taxes while the Trump cuts are still in place. In 2025, according to the Tax Policy Center, the top 1% would get 25% of the cut. That’s still a lot, but keep in mind that the top 1% also pay a lot.
After-tax incomes of people in the top 1% are estimated by the Tax Policy Center to rise 2.9% in 2025 vs. a scenario of no change in the tax law. Here are the estimated increases for everyone else: the bottom fifth of households, up 0.4%; second fifth, up 0.9%; middle fifth, up 1.3%; fourth fifth, up 1.4%; and top fifth (which includes the top 1%), up 2.3%. So it’s fair to say that based on the TPC analysis, the tax cut is skewed to the rich, but it’s not as skewed as the Biden campaign one-liner implies.
The Tax Foundation, whose analyses tend to find better results from tax cuts than those of the Tax Policy Center, estimates the following changes in after-tax incomes in 2025: the bottom fifth of households, up 0.7%; second fifth, up 1%; middle fifth, up 1.3%; fourth fifth, up 1.4%; top fifth, up 1.8%, and top 1%, up 2.1%.
While it’s hard to separate out the impact of the tax cuts from other forces acting on the economy, a study last year by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (PDF) estimated that the TCJA “likely boosted GDP growth by 0.8 percentage point and job growth by roughly 0.24 percentage point in 2018.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-27/the-trump-tax-cut-wasn-t-just-for-the-rich***building a wall on the southern border, waist of money there are much better ways to protect the border drones are much cheaper.
First - I believe a wall is not the ‘end all’ - but a vital part of securing our border.
"President Donald Trump’s promise to build a wall along our Southern border will save countless innocent lives. Our Border Patrol agents have seen firsthand the success of a border wall in Yuma, Ariz. — which serves as a prime example of how investments in personnel, technology and a border wall can turn the tide against a flood of i*****l i*********n and secure our homeland.
For years, Yuma sector was besieged by chaos as a nearly unending flood of migrants and drugs poured across our border. Even as agents were arresting on average 800 i*****l a***ns a day, we were still unable to stop the thousands of trucks filled with drugs and humans that quickly crossed a vanishing point and dispersed into communities all across the country.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/22/homeland-security-secretary-border-walls-work-yuma-sector-proves-it-elaine-duke-column/586853001/**Separating children from their parents and putting them in cages, cause that just ain't right
Did the Obama administration separate families at the southern U.S. border?
Yes, U.S. border officials did separate children from their parents on occasion
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-27/p**********l-immigration-debate-fact-check-and-who-built-the-cages**Paying farmers billions for his failed tariffs, this will never end that business isn't coming back.
Highly contentious issue - I agree President Trump should have handled this differently.
**Supporting clean coal, these plants are long overdue closing and big polluters plus the coal ash left deal with
Our country needs to take a careful, measured approach to the use of coal in a manner that makes a smooth t***sition without having an extreme impact on our economy.
I believe nuclear power is a better answer.
**No health care plan, he'll try to k**l the ACA and have nothing to replace it.
Health care is a critical issue. I do not believe the ACA is a viable option and was designed to fail.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/taxanalysts/2017/01/12/social-welfare-on-the-cheap-why-obamacare-was-built-to-fail/?sh=5871e04d718bI have a natural distrust of large government programs: Think government run health care: The efficiency of the postal service and the compassion of the IRS. I believe we can create a health care system that incorporates healthy competition.
**Which of his policies do you like and why?
The only Biden policies I have seen from Biden are his comments about fracking…and he changed his stance several times. He also stated he was going to immediately reverse all of Trumps EO’s (Executive Orders), which I consider pretty dumb: He might want to check and find which work and are good - rather than stop them simply because Trump initiated them.