If Biden is Sworn in
Nov 23, 2020 20:10:26 #
eagleye13 wrote:
When China Joe is sworn in; it wont take long for his being c*********d to Red China is exposed.
Well now he should be impeached too don’t you think ?? A billion dollar blackmail has got to rate right on up there like Trumps right??? I mean not that there's any conflict with he and son working the foreign countries, right???
Nov 23, 2020 21:21:55 #
Seth wrote:
I have good luck. I participate in a forum that has Linda on it. 
Such a very nice compliment, Seth... Thank You and know I have luck too, having your wisdom you share with us... Thought provoking an understatement...
Nov 23, 2020 21:24:30 #
Seth wrote:
Which the mainstream media will bend over backwards to cover up. These last few years, their specialty has been telling us that things that are as plain as the nose on our face aren't as plain as the nose on our face.
Amen, to that fact!!!
Nov 23, 2020 21:26:22 #
SSDD wrote:
The house's impeachment wasn't a trial, the senate conducts the trial. I thought you worked in legal, doesn't appears so to me.
"She" doesn't.
And "she's" full of malarkey like so many here. But they love their malarkey to the bitter end. Never gonna give it up, apparently.
Nov 23, 2020 21:26:36 #
lindajoy wrote:
Well now he should be impeached too don’t you think ?? A billion dollar blackmail has got to rate right on up there like Trumps right??? I mean not that there's any conflict with he and son working the foreign countries, right???
You seem a little confused Linda...
Trump was being impeached for bribing a foreign power while he was president, not for the business links with companies in other countries that he and his sons were involved in BEFORE he became president.
Also, Burisma is not a country, it's a private company AND H****r B***n is not a director on their board anymore. Joe Biden (unlike Trump) will probably do what every other president has done and divest himself from all of his private interests before taking office.
So, there really isn't any comparison at all. Not that I can see...
Now, tell me about that billion dollar blackmail. I don't think I've heard that one.
Nov 23, 2020 21:27:13 #
Seth wrote:
I have good luck. I participate in a forum that has Linda on it.
Linda is one of the best people on this forum. I honestly believe that is exactly why the Democrat socialists h**e her so much. I really wish there were a number of people as clear headed and erudite as linda is. The format would be better with more of her thinking ability.
SWMBO
Nov 23, 2020 21:31:20 #
SSDD wrote:
The house's impeachment wasn't a trial, the senate conducts the trial. I thought you worked in legal, doesn't appears so to me.
I think she's a paralegal... So, she knows *some* stuff.
Nov 23, 2020 21:38:30 #
SSDD wrote:
Trolls need not call ANYBODY a trolls, specifically or even generally.
If they do, they have it coming... PERIOD!
Now IF she herself were NOT a troll... then maybe she wouldn't have had it coming but that is clearly not the case.
If they do, they have it coming... PERIOD!
Now IF she herself were NOT a troll... then maybe she wouldn't have had it coming but that is clearly not the case.
Ohhhh, I see now... That which you profess is so wrong, you turn right around and do as you claim is so wrong~~~ Got it~~ 🤫
Nothing hypocritical there, not one bit.. Or is it just ok since you are the one doing what you just spent so long b***hing about~~ Now that’s just brilliant... Thank you for showing us a bit more of your character make up... Stellar, really~~~
Nov 23, 2020 21:42:40 #
SWMBO wrote:
Linda is one of the best people on this forum. I honestly believe that is exactly why the Democrat socialists h**e her so much. I really wish there were a number of people as clear headed and erudite as linda is. The format would be better with more of her thinking ability.
SWMBO
SWMBO
Democratic socialists h**e her? Really? Boy you guys really like to be dramatic, don't you? LOL. Is that like how the deep state h**es Trump? LOL
Personally, I don't have a problem with Linda. She isn't as nasty or quite so i***tic as a lot of people here, but I don't think she presents any reason for "Democratic Socialists" to h**e her either. Maybe that's just what you wish.
Nov 23, 2020 21:54:54 #
lindajoy wrote:
Most likely, that keyboard commando mentality is easy to achieve when sitting behind a screen
Just ask Sici.
Nov 23, 2020 22:07:23 #
lindajoy wrote:
Well now he should be impeached too don’t you think ?? A billion dollar blackmail has got to rate right on up there like Trumps right??? I mean not that there's any conflict with he and son working the foreign countries, right???
According to the Democrats and the mainstream media, "nothing to see there."
According to them, there seems to be nothing to see anywhere, because every time you turn around, there's more Democrat skullduggery afoot.
Then along come the useful i***ts who have never heard the term "where there's smoke, there's fire" and thus continue defending those corrupt, scheming, feckless t*****rs without question.
It's baffling that anyone is going to put so much effort into defending the honor of people who have none.
Nov 23, 2020 22:07:57 #
lindajoy wrote:
Such a very nice compliment, Seth... Thank You and know I have luck too, having your wisdom you share with us... Thought provoking an understatement...
Nov 23, 2020 22:09:21 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
"She" doesn't.
And "she's" full of malarkey like so many here. But they love their malarkey to the bitter end. Never gonna give it up, apparently.
And "she's" full of malarkey like so many here. But they love their malarkey to the bitter end. Never gonna give it up, apparently.
So speaketh the Useless Mattoid.
Nov 23, 2020 22:22:45 #
lindajoy wrote:
In this forum we “read the facts”, we never “ hear” the facts.. Now that’s a fact right there...
Was that an attempt at humor or was it a show of inflexibility? Inflection is hard to "hear" when we have to read a person's responses.
Nov 23, 2020 22:43:18 #
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Of course you will, no surprise there, simply due to me not being of your party. Your opinion of Linda is very different from mine. Good luck
We have to "assume" that she actually has legal experience. I am far too cynical to make just such an assumption. I haven't seen much, more to the point, ANYTHING, that suggests that she has any such legal experience. IF she truly does have legal experience, let's hope not as a judge. In my opinion, she doesn't have what it takes to be a judge, one such requirement she appears to lack is impartiality. She also fails to weigh evidence equally with a heavy finger on the fringe far right wing bent side of the scales.
Additionally I hope she isn't a lawyer, neither for the prosecution nor the defense. She as a prosecutor is likely to go far too light on some while coming down heavy on others. As a defense attorney, I would be afraid she would roll over for the prosecution when representing some clients and be far too int***sigent while defending others, the int***sigence can be a positive attribute as defense in many circumstances, a detriment in others.
Overall... I tend to doubt she IS or ever was in the legal profession, IF she was, she doesn't show it with any of her displays and in my opinion, she hasn't the temperament, legal knowledge nor mental stability... But then again... To play devil's advocate... Exhibit A. Rudy Giuliani... Rudy Giuliani shows that people that "hasn't (Haven't, but as I am "borrowing" one of my own quotes from earlier...) the temperament, legal knowledge nor mental stability" can in fact have served in the legal profession.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.