One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If Biden is Sworn in
Page <<first <prev 30 of 41 next> last>>
Nov 22, 2020 23:28:09   #
SSDD
 
Seth wrote:
That's all very nice, but you're still a troll.


Define "troll", I feel confident that it suits you better than me.

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 23:51:32   #
Seth
 
SSDD wrote:
Define "troll", I feel confident that it suits you better than me.


You post baseless, irrelevant bumper sticker innuendo with no basis in reality and call it "facts," then challenge other people to prove their statements with facts.

Like Bad Bob and others, like that Roy character, you do your orange man bad no matter what idiocy based purely on character assassination without ever showing a single example of how he's not doing a good job, except where you can employ a bumper sticker lie that ignores his actual efforts and accomplishments and twists them into failures.Your every utterance is either blatant disinformation, slander or simple TDS. You are aggressively non-credible in every way, shape and form, and your posting has all the same characteristics as does a horsefly. Other than that, you're okay.

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 00:18:13   #
SSDD
 
Seth wrote:
You post baseless, irrelevant bumper sticker innuendo with no basis in reality and call it "facts," then challenge other people to prove their statements with facts.

Like Bad Bob and others, like that Roy character, you do your orange man bad no matter what idiocy based purely on character assassination without ever showing a single example of how he's not doing a good job, except where you can employ a bumper sticker lie that ignores his actual efforts and accomplishments and twists them into failures.Your every utterance is either blatant disinformation, slander or simple TDS. You are aggressively non-credible in every way, shape and form, and your posting has all the same characteristics as does a horsefly. Other than that, you're okay.
You post baseless, irrelevant bumper sticker innue... (show quote)


Ah, you have me confused with someone else then, I see. Yeah, how many memes have you seen me post, be honest now.

As for "baseless claims"... Now you seem to have me confused with you Trumplicans. Oh wait, many Trumplicans like to throw stupid baseless memes that couldn't be further from reality...

Ah, another of those projections you people love casting huh? Your whole post is a projection... Okay, I am replying on a pointless post, later.

Reply
 
 
Nov 23, 2020 00:24:47   #
Seth
 
SSDD wrote:
Ah, you have me confused with someone else then, I see. Yeah, how many memes have you seen me post, be honest now.

As for "baseless claims"... Now you seem to have me confused with you Trumplicans. Oh wait, many Trumplicans like to throw stupid baseless memes that couldn't be further from reality...

Ah, another of those projections you people love casting huh? Your whole post is a projection... Okay, I am replying on a pointless post, later.


Hopefully much.

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 02:55:11   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Wow, another post that appears written by a mental midget.


So God Made A Liberal..
https://youtu.be/EUzMPlQb2G4

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 02:59:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
SSDD wrote:
Yes, honest people use lawyers to protect themselves from being "railroaded", criminals use lawyers to get away with that which they, themselves have done. That is the t***h. The question is, which is the case with Trump.

You fail to acknowledge that he (Trump) has engaged in fraud, pretty much his entire adult life. There is the bank frauds where he inflated the values of his holdings to secure large loans, the tax frauds where he deflated the values of his holdings to secure many reduced tax burdens, the fraudulent university he licensed and endorsed, Trump university, there is the charity foundation he set up but did very little charitable work with and didn't even donate his own money to, yet he used the funds as his own little "piggy bank", such a suitable term there, "piggy" as it was awful selfish of him to use donated money for his own purposes rather than for charity work, there is the stiffing of contractors and creditors, the list could probably go on quite a while if one were to list every fraudulent act Trump has committed over the decades. There is much documentation of his "frauds", if only one were to go do some research, one might become informed. Many have tried to inform Trumplicans, none seem to succeed, mostly due to the Trumplicans' refusal of facts. Frankly, it is tiresome to even bother trying to help inform Trumplicans, they are quite obstinate in their refusal of the facts.

With oh so much documentation of Trump's dishonesty, why is it so hard for you to accept that he is dishonest? Don't bother answering, the question is rhetorical, I already know the answer.
Yes, honest people use lawyers to protect themselv... (show quote)


Trump defeated the queen of corruption;

Exposed: The Clinton Scandals (Full Special)
https://youtu.be/hTHqf4UbdJM
Bill and Hillary are the Left's power couple and Jesse Kelly is exposing their corruption. From B******i to Whitewater, the Clintons are the epitome of political sleaze and Jesse Kelly is here to call them out.

AND
A blast from the past
Rachel Maddow Meltdown (Gets that Smirk Wiped off Her Face - 2016 E******n); HOLY MELTDOWN, BATMAN!
https://youtu.be/WjN_4VTy-jk

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 08:09:26   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
SSDD wrote:
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-201330-19.html#3529005


So, one that takes pains to prove their claims is a troll, one that expects others to prove claims that they themselves made is not a troll? Isn't that backwards?

Hell, SWMBO used the term "troll" in her own fucking post and she wasn't implying another was a troll? Really? Look at her post and tell me she wasn't claiming others were trolls, I will be standing by to call you a liar.

In this case, she was implying that I myself am a troll, one that DOES provide facts and evidence to back my claims. You know, because that is what trolls do, they back their claims with facts. Something that the three making the troll claim rarely do.

I also don't go throwing the troll claim around. Others do and those others that do, they tend to be Trumplicans and they also tend to be the ones refusing to back their claims with facts. Maybe I wouldn't be called a troll so frequently if I too refused to back my claims with facts, think I should try that? Strange times we live in.

Either start acting like an adult and stop making baseless claims and refusing to do any research or I am done with you.
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-201330-19.html... (show quote)


You tell me how SW is singling you out with her overall comment about “trolls” in general.. She is not speaking in the singular context but in the plural noun form...As plain as the nose on your face...

SWMBO wrote:
For some time I have been reading the trolls post and realize that the format on most of them, as well as the wording, seem to indicate “that there are only a few trolls but they are using an assortment of different names.” That would not surprise me, considering the massive frauds they are already responsible for.

Research was not needed, the post was right there to view, just as it is here..You grouped together other discussions on trolls and attacked one who did not address you but trolls in general.. You associate yourself with the term not at her doing, but your own...

BTW, I didn’t ask you to “ catch me up on anything.”

Reply
 
 
Nov 23, 2020 08:32:27   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
SSDD wrote:
No, there was no subpoena because the senate refused witnesses, get it straight. What is the need for a subpoena if no testimony is to be heard?


You get it straight, it wasn’t the Senate’s responsibility to present congresses falsely alleged impeachment allegations!! Where was all that “ evidence” they lied about having for a year before they moved on impeachment??? Even when they were the ones orchestrating it all.. lolol what a friggen joke it was and they for even trying it...

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 08:34:30   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
SSDD wrote:
No, there was no subpoena because the senate refused witnesses, get it straight. What is the need for a subpoena if no testimony is to be heard?


Oh stop repeating what I already said, gezzzz or is that “ catch up.”

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 08:39:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
SSDD wrote:
Love the denial of facts meme you have used, very suitable for you. You just love to refuse to "hear" the facts. To witness you refusing to "hear" the facts, well, this saying sounds suited to you, "My mind is already made up, please don't confuse me with the facts.".


In this forum we “read the facts”, we never “ hear” the facts.. Now that’s a fact right there...

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 08:45:56   #
Cuda2020
 
Seth wrote:
Given that she is in the legal profession and judging by her posts probably exceptional at the sk**ls her work entails, I would have to discount your opinion on this case to be of a purely partisan nature rather than based on any sort of actual knowledge of the subject at hand.


Of course you will, no surprise there, simply due to me not being of your party. Your opinion of Linda is very different from mine. Good luck

Reply
 
 
Nov 23, 2020 08:47:15   #
Cuda2020
 
lindajoy wrote:
In this forum we “read the facts”, we never “ hear” the facts.. Now that’s a fact right there...


Another petty comment

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 08:57:30   #
Cuda2020
 
SSDD wrote:
Ah, you have me confused with someone else then, I see. Yeah, how many memes have you seen me post, be honest now.

As for "baseless claims"... Now you seem to have me confused with you Trumplicans. Oh wait, many Trumplicans like to throw stupid baseless memes that couldn't be further from reality...

Ah, another of those projections you people love casting huh? Your whole post is a projection... Okay, I am replying on a pointless post, later.


You will find most of the replies back are simply diversions from the issue with petty, adolescent insults, that's all they have, they want to convince others what you just said has no validity, when we in actuality, we know the very opposite is true.

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 09:42:29   #
Rose42
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
You will find most of the replies back are simply diversions from the issue with petty, adolescent insults, that's all they have, they want to convince others what you just said has no validity, when we in actuality, we know the very opposite is true.


With you its always the other person. Linda isn't petty and you're addressing one of the most petty, adolescent people on the forum. But that doesn't matter to you because he's on your "side".

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 09:43:59   #
Rose42
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Of course you will, no surprise there, simply due to me not being of your party. Your opinion of Linda is very different from mine. Good luck


You sound familiar with your rather peculiar dislike of Linda...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 30 of 41 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.