I am now ready to buy a shotgun for protection (Page 3): ...and they would be in violation of the second amendment...do you understand that.....

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Workinman wrote:

Hey dummy check out NY they are testing the water right now to see how far they can push it...is it kook aid or bs with you guys?

...and they would be in violation of the second amendment...do you understand that.....

Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon

Dummy Boy wrote:

...and they would be in violation of the second amendment...do you understand that.....

Yes I understand was wondering if you did...if by "they" you mean the state.

Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon

Loki wrote:

Very good choice, I just prefer Glock. I have lar... (show quote)

Yep as far as I know the 1911 is and was "Old Reliable" for many for a reason. I don't have a lot of experience with the pistol, I prefer long guns and you're right a smooth trigger pull is everything when it comes to accuracy,

Loki Loc: Georgia

Workinman wrote:

Yep as far as I know the 1911 is and was "Old Reliable" for many for a reason. I don't have a lot of experience with the pistol, I prefer long guns and you're right a smooth trigger pull is everything when it comes to accuracy,

My Glock 21 is nearly as accurate as the Colt Gold Cup, more accurate than either of the 2 Commanders I have owned, and more reliable than any of the three.

bahmer

Dummy Boy wrote:

...then I suggest that "we" gun owners need to become bodyguards.....

We all are bodyguards the difference is that we are all guarding our own bodies and not someone elses body. But in my book a body is a body so as long as I have a body and a gun I am a bodyguard end of discussion.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Workinman wrote:

Yes I understand was wondering if you did...if by "they" you mean the state.

Yes, "they" would be a given state, but my response was how it affected NY state.

Although, states rights allow them to create some kind "solution" (as my home state did), but outright banning or preventing the sale of weapons is a no, no.

No state law can supercede the Constitution and if state courts want to set monies aside to fight the NRA-good luck, because the NRA can sue for all of the court costs as well. An outright ban of weapons is impossible unless you want to update the Constitution. That would take 7 years or more.

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

Nobody is going to take your guns, but judging from your comment, they probably should!

Dummy Boy wrote:

...nobody gonna take your guns, that's crazy talk.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

saltwind 78 wrote:

Nobody is going to take your guns, but judging from your comment, they probably should!

I don't understand?

...and I have grown tired of this discussion (in general)....because I believe in the Constitution, and I can own guns....and if my home state is stupid enough to do anything close to violating my rights, I've got the NRA on speed dial.

Patty

All you have tom do is look at Canada. The scenario is exactly then same other than our constitution gives them no authority to make any gun laws of any kind. Read the 10th amendment.

saltwind 78 wrote:

Nobody is going to take your guns, but judging from your comment, they probably should!

Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon

Dummy Boy wrote:

Yes, "they" would be a given state, but ... (show quote)

But doesn't all the regulations that the Government is putting in place past and present "Infringe" on our rights?

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Workinman wrote:

But doesn't all the regulations that the Government is putting in place past and present "Infringe" on our rights?

....are you implying as it applies to the 2nd amendment...or ....???

Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon

Dummy Boy wrote:

....are you implying as it applies to the 2nd amendment...or ....???

Yes sorry, second amendment rights.

Blacksheep

oldroy wrote:

Bring on those guvmint fellows who want my arms. How long will it take them to determine why their friends are falling because the gun is pointed at them? This invention makes hunting and clay shooting so much quieter for those who use the gun for sport.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/07/23/put-a-silencer-on-a-shotgun-and-this-is-what-it-sounds-like/

Not to mention k*****g those large stray dogs that their i***t owners allow to run loose and attack my pets and livestock and threaten me, without my neighbors having a clue. I like it, great idea. Gotta get me one.

Patty

our Constitution authorizes the federal government to handle the following objects for the Country at Large:
Military defense, international commerce & relations;
Control immigration & naturalization of new citizens;
Domestically, to create a uniform commercial system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, money based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, mail delivery & some road building; and
With some of the amendments, secure certain civil rights.

Basically, thats it. As stated in the 10th Amendment, all others powers are reserved by the States or The People.

CDM Loc: Florida

oldroy wrote:

Bring on those guvmint fellows who want my arms. How long will it take them to determine why their friends are falling because the gun is pointed at them? This invention makes hunting and clay shooting so much quieter for those who use the gun for sport.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/07/23/put-a-silencer-on-a-shotgun-and-this-is-what-it-sounds-like/

Old; Now I'm confused. I distinctly heard Joe Biden tell everybody that the best home defense is a double barrel shotgun. And the way to use it if someone is breaking into your house to k**l you is to go out on the back porch and fire both barrels into the air...and that will scare away the k**ler.

Now, if I use this gizmo, the k**ler will not hear my gun go off and will come in and k**l me anyway...

Ya think Old Joe knows about this? He'll have a hissy... ;-)