The IRS seems to be testing Congres's patience (Page 2): Maybe we can move the entire upper management of the along with the POTUS into adjoining cells to keep each other company. Oh...

bahmer

ninetogo wrote:

__________________________________________________... (show quote)

Maybe we can move the entire upper management of the along with the POTUS into adjoining cells to keep each other company. Oh you can throw in Eric Holder and his upper management from the department of injustice with them,

greyfox Loc: western mass.

tdsrnest wrote:

Why do you read this s**t they just turned over the remainder of the 3700 emails requested by your dumb s**t Issa. That has absolutely nothing to do with Issa BS that is all current emails so stop your BS and get to the facts. Right wing pro panda in full swing. What a joke

Sounds like you are teed off at Issa for doing his job (too bad the Dems on that committee will not do the same). Why is it on just about all those committes the Repubs fight to get to the t***h and the Dems (look so bias) azzzz kissing rather than asking pointed questions---seeems like all they want to do is bury the t***h!!!!
:evil:

greyfox Loc: western mass.

clarkwv wrote:

The IRS might be testing the patience of some Republican members of Congress, but I do not think the Democrats at all.

So what are you saying? You think the IRS is playing games with the Repubs knowing the Dems will NEVER ask them any questions they can not easily answer. Pathetic :twisted: :twisted:

greyfox Loc: western mass.

ninetogo wrote:

__________________________________________________... (show quote)

I sure hope so: Learner, Holder and afew i can not remember their names!!!

Parrothead Loc: In front of my laptop

Elwood wrote:

And that is exactly what I said. If you don't like my posts you always have the option to not look at them. In his case, I advised him not to since wh**ever he will submit in response to my posts in future I will ignore. Is that clear enough for you?

Apparently you are dealing with yet another moron who has a problem with reading comprehension and is unable to properly construct a sentence. :roll:

Elwood Loc: Florida

Parrothead wrote:

Apparently you are dealing with yet another moron who has a problem with reading comprehension and is unable to properly construct a sentence. :roll:

:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Dangerkitten

ninetogo wrote:

_This cover-up and these lies go all the way up to... (show quote)

Parrothead Loc: In front of my laptop

Here's the problem. How convienent. :shock:

"The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of that branch, from engaging in partisan political activity. "

As usual Obummer has an out. :shock:

bahmer

Parrothead wrote:

Here's the problem. How convienent. :shock:

"The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of that branch, from engaging in partisan political activity. "

As usual Obummer has an out. :shock:

Would that not have excluded Nixon in 1974 then as well?

Elwood Loc: Florida

Parrothead wrote:

Here's the problem. How convienent. :shock:

"The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials of that branch, from engaging in partisan political activity. "

As usual Obummer has an out. :shock:

:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Parrothead Loc: In front of my laptop

bahmer wrote:

Would that not have excluded Nixon in 1974 then as well?

Hell if I know. I live in the present. Not 40 years ago.
I assume you refer to Watergate. :roll:

bahmer

Parrothead wrote:

Hell if I know. I live in the present. Not 40 years ago.
I assume you refer to Watergate. :roll:

I'm not saying that the Hatch act won't help Obama as it may well do so. All I'm asking is if does as you say or surmise that it does it should have covered Nixons ass as well. I think that what has shielded Obamas ass for so long is the fact that the senate has been controlled by the democrats as well as the fact that the republicans for the most part without testicles and have no stomach for a fight. They are to afraid of being labeled a r****t for bringing impeachment charges against the first president of color. That is the establishments fear of having the Tea Party candidates elected as well. The Tea Party would actually make them fight various battles including maybe bringing Obama up on impeachment charges.