Elwood wrote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/21/irs-seeks-help-destroying-another-3200-computer-ha/#sthash.DGsSG0m8.dpuf
What else are they trying to cover up? Congress should have a hay day with this latest development. :hunf:
Why do you read this s**t they just turned over the remainder of the 3700 emails requested by your dumb s**t Issa. That has absolutely nothing to do with Issa BS that is all current emails so stop your BS and get to the facts. Right wing pro panda in full swing. What a joke
tdsrnest wrote:
Why do you read this s**t they just turned over the remainder of the 3700 emails requested by your dumb s**t Issa. That has absolutely nothing to do with Issa BS that is all current emails so stop your BS and get to the facts. Right wing pro panda in full swing. What a joke
You are on my ignore list. Piss off and don't respond to my posts in future. :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :hunf:
Elwood wrote:
You are on my ignore list. Piss off and don't respond to my posts in future. :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :hunf:
As I understand this from is an open frog , so you do not have the power enforce your own post.
Elwood wrote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/21/irs-seeks-help-destroying-another-3200-computer-ha/#sthash.DGsSG0m8.dpuf
What else are they trying to cover up? Congress should have a hay day with this latest development. :hunf:
The IRS might be testing the patience of some Republican members of Congress, but I do not think the Democrats at all.
tdsrnest wrote:
Why do you read this s**t they just turned over the remainder of the 3700 emails requested by your dumb s**t Issa. That has absolutely nothing to do with Issa BS that is all current emails so stop your BS and get to the facts. Right wing pro panda in full swing. What a joke
Why are you afraid of the t***h---if there is no smidgen of corruption THEN WHY NOT SHOW EVERYTHING and and get the t***h out once and for all--stop the damn delays!!!!!
Elwood wrote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/21/irs-seeks-help-destroying-another-3200-computer-ha/#sthash.DGsSG0m8.dpuf
What else are they trying to cover up? Congress should have a hay day with this latest development. :hunf:
If I didn't know any better I would think that I am on a pier in the ocean where all of the fishing boats tie up. Because something smells very fishy here and I am no where near the ocean or any place to fish for that matter.But I have been fishing before and this sure smells like fish to me.
clarkwv wrote:
As I understand this from is an open frog , so you do not have the power enforce your own post.
All I said was that I would ignore his future comments. Doesn't stop him or others from making comments. That is my choice. :hunf:
bahmer wrote:
If I didn't know any better I would think that I am on a pier in the ocean where all of the fishing boats tie up. Because something smells very fishy here and I am no where near the ocean or any place to fish for that matter.But I have been fishing before and this sure smells like fish to me.
:lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Elwood wrote:
All I said was that I would ignore his future comments. Doesn't stop him or others from making comments. That is my choice. :hunf:
No, what you said," Piss off and don't respond to my posts in future.' You should remember what you said.
clarkwv wrote:
No, what you said," Piss off and don't respond to my posts in future.' You should remember what you said.
And that is exactly what I said. If you don't like my posts you always have the option to not look at them. In his case, I advised him not to since wh**ever he will submit in response to my posts in future I will ignore. Is that clear enough for you?
Elwood wrote:
And that is exactly what I said. If you don't like my posts you always have the option to not look at them. In his case, I advised him not to since wh**ever he will submit in response to my posts in future I will ignore. Is that clear enough for you?
that is not what you said, I quoted what you said.
clarkwv wrote:
that is not what you said, I quoted what you said.
Read my lips. I agreed with you but I guess you are too dense to understand it. End of conversation. Too boring to continue.
clarkwv wrote:
The IRS might be testing the patience of some Republican members of Congress, but I do not think the Democrats at all.
__________________________________________________
Clarkwv; When a government employee engages in an activity that is directed by partisan politics, then participates in evading or hiding that partisan activity, that constitutes a violation of the Hatch Act. All government employees are subject to the legal liability imposed by the Hatch Act. If they participate in an partisan political activity at the direction of their department superiors, both are equally liable. That is one of the few grounds for immediate termination of a Federal employee. Think back to the Watergate participates and what happened to them. Each severed Federal Prison sentences. If proven that our current group of federal employees are found to be in violation of the Hatch Act, they will serve prison sentences, as well.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.