Serenity54321 wrote:
###########
By your argument half of Americans would be c*****e c****e deniers because half of Americans are Republicans.
That doesn't even make any sense, not with the adaptions citizens are already making to lesson our damage on the planet.
:thumbdown: :thumbdown:
The march in place R TPukes. It's not what they believe. It what they are told to believe
You should be very afraid, handjob.
Jack2014 wrote:
The march in place R TPukes. It's not what they believe. It what they are told to believe
##########
Yes, well I'll believe Obama is the pristine environmental example when he quits golfing on fancy golf courses that waste more gallons of water than the average consumer in Michigan can afford to drink.
Loki wrote:
He never intended to make any sense. He is an occupy wh**ever with boundless faith in intelligence he doesn't possess.
Look at the RTpukes in the House. They are virtually all climate deniers.
Serenity54321 wrote:
##########
Yes, well I'll believe Obama is the pristine environmental example when he quits golfing on fancy golf courses that waste more gallons of water than the average consumer in Michigan can afford to drink.
How do you know they aren't using waste water? Many do! Almost all out west where there is drought.
Jack2014 wrote:
Climate will,probably get us before then. Not far off according to Thom Hartman.
Hehehe, a progressive talk show host in NY? Is that your irrefutable source?
Oh, Jack don't you believe in evolution?
Won't we just evolve?
Jack2014 wrote:
How do you know they aren't using waste water? Many do! Almost all out west where there is drought.
###########
My point is only that the President doesn't practice what he preaches, as most politicians don't, and that turns my stomach. Which is why politically I stay Independent.
I think most Americans understand, even Republican Americans, that we can't just mindlessly dump poisons into our water systems, or guzzle gasoline, or waste electricity. Why did your dad always yell at you to turn out the lights when you weren't in the room?
American citizens are responding to the call to be more respectful to our earth, but it is never enough for liberals. They throw it back in our face as if it's garbage.
I, for one, will respect our resources as I can. Yet I will at one and the same time condemn those Republicans who refuse to, and the Democrats who appreciate nothing and h**efully spit in our faces for more.
TroubleshooterTim wrote:
Hehehe, a progressive talk show host in NY? Is that your irrefutable source?
Oh, Jack don't you believe in evolution?
Won't we just evolve?
A very well educated columnist who has written books on the subject. What have you done?
Jack2014 wrote:
A very well educated columnist who has written books on the subject. What have you done?
Thom Hartmann. He campaigned for Barry Goldwater, then did a one-eighty and became a member of the SDS. He has a degree in electrical engineering and used to work for RCA. I don't know how to explain this so you can comprehend, but being an engineer does not make you a meteorologist. Expertise in one field does not confer expertise in another, and writing a book about a subject outside your area of expertise does not make you an authority, it makes you an author.
Loki wrote:
Thom Hartmann. He campaigned for Barry Goldwater, then did a one-eighty and became a member of the SDS. He has a degree in electrical engineering and used to work for RCA. I don't know how to explain this so you can comprehend, but being an engineer does not make you a meteorologist. Expertise in one field does not confer expertise in another, and writing a book about a subject outside your area of expertise does not make you an authority, it makes you an author.
So?
He is well educated!
You're just stupid
What does meteorology have to do with it? Reading graphs and data points?
Jack2014 wrote:
So?
He is well educated!
You're just stupid
What does meteorology have to do with it? Reading graphs and data points?
I was wrong to call you a moron; you would need to acquire about 20 IQ points for that.
me·te·or·ol·o·gy [mee-tee-uh-rol-uh-jee] Show IPA
noun
1.
the science dealing with the atmosphere and its phenomena, including weather and climate.
2.
the atmospheric conditions and weather of an area.
Origin:
161020; < Greek meteōrología discussion of celestial phenomena. See meteor, -o-, -logy
WTF do you think we were talking about, you poster boy for dumbass? Try to keep up. You were exposing your ignorance about c*****e c****e, and carbon emissions. Meteorology is climate science. There is a little more to it than the pretty little girl on TV who tells you whether or not it will rain tomorrow. Being an engineer does not qualify you as an authority on climate science. Neither does being a left wing talk show host. Being a brainless pest, such as yourself, is certainly no guarantor of knowledge. You will have to do better, you are being a bore.
Jack2014 wrote:
C'mon monkey man,
There's an increase in CO2 and humans are reducing the capacity to reduce it daily by cutting down the rain forest globally, and getting more populous in China and India. Also ,the increase in manufacturing in both country's is having an effect. We are out of balance or equilibrium.
**************
It is almost unbelievable that knowing how important the rain forests are to the welfare of this planet, how even greedy members can even consider it. Read in the Tico Times that, fortunately, the CR people rose up to protect the further destruction of their rain forest from construction companies who were interested in building vacation housing for foreigners. These are a people who take ecology seriously. I wish there were more of them.
:) :) :)
Alicia wrote:
**************
It is almost unbelievable that knowing how important the rain forests are to the welfare of this planet, how even greedy members can even consider it. Read in the Tico Times that, fortunately, the CR people rose up to protect the further destruction of their rain forest from construction companies who were interested in building vacation housing for foreigners. These are a people who take ecology seriously. I wish there were more of them.
:) :) :)
Many people don't know that the vast majority of CO2 to Oxygen metabolism happens by Sea plants, not the land forests.
http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources/oceanography-book/carboncycle.htmNot saying that forests aren't important.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.